Bulldozed over them. Alive and dead. Couldn't take the gore no longer.

I have empathy for him, honesty. He belived the propaganda about defending the country an all that. Then was ordered to to horrible things. He experienced the difference between a lie told and a lie lived and just couldn't deal with it.

He not the bad guy here.

I disagree.

Evolution is not so much a numbers game. Otherwise Bacteria, Ants, Viruses and the like would have to be crowned winners. So the point op brings up is ~~mute~~ moot.

The point you add, that they keep reproducing, is also not relevant in evelotionary terms. The short amount of time that we have domesticated chickens, let a side the very resent industalisation of animal farming (it started in the 1950s ish), is just not relevante in evelotionary terms.

I'd say what makes a successfull species is resilience. 99 % of all species have gone extinct. The "winners" of evelotion are, in my opinion, those species that have lasted the longest. And in that regard, chicken ain't looking to good. They are highly dependent upon humans. Most industrial chickens are genetic aborninatons, bred for beeing fat, fast growing, egg laying machines to the point where their own bones brake because they lack calcium. I'd argue that chickens in their current form would not last long in "the wild". Hence once humans are gone their is a high chance chickens will follow.

That's normal and unrelated. It takes about 6 to i months for the final eye colour to manifest on children.

Also pretending that 4000 years ago humans were still hunter gatherers or something (it's kind of implied in the wording imo). 4000 years ago there were plenty of fairly developed civilisations around.

Belief in magic is pretty even between the genders and pretty common

I was interested and looked up some studies. There is a gender gap in spiritual believe and women tend to be more spiritual, including believing in magic. So OPs statement in that regards holds.

Just to be clear, I'm not saying everything that op wrote is correct or that I agree, but the starting point they used, that women tend to belive in magical stuff more often, seems to be true.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340544674_Examining_the_roles_of_Intuition_and_Gender_in_Magical_Beliefs

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617579/

You can cook em in hot water to losen the hair. It's called scalding.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/dehairing L

And wrote paper about it.

https://isidore.co/misc/Physics%20papers%20and%20books/Zotero/storage/A9H3WWKL/Stephens%20-%202008%20-%20Ancient%20Roman%20hairdressing%20on%20(hair)pins%20and%20need.pdf

Monculture only convert about half the Co2 that a real forest would.

Well I guess this explains the whole best or random man on the woods thing.

Rip TB

It's worse. They are activly driving climate change and when extreme weather events happen more frequently they take that as reassurance that it's Goss punishment for beeing to gay.

It's wild. Depressing to. But also realy wild.

• Nein. Das würde, außer mich als Extremist zu stempeln, nichts bewirken. Außerdem komme ich so mit Fleischessern in Kontakt und kann Denkanstöße geben, ohne dabei zu missionieren.

• Nein. Ich habe, am Anfang, als ich noch frischer Veganer war, ab und an mal einen Met getrunken, aber auch das mache ich schon seit Jahren nicht mehr.

• Ich frage nach. Beim Essen gehen rechne ich mich kreuzkontsmination mit Milchproduktion und leider auch Fleisch möglich sind. Finde ich ekelig, aber kann ich drüber weg sehen. Wenn unklar ist ob alle Zutaten Vegan sind esse ich es nicht.

• Finde ich ekelig uns anders als beim Essen gehen kann ich das vermeiden.

• Ist okay. Grundsätzlich ist es ja ein gutes Zeichen, vegane Angebote zu unterstützen. Meins sind die genannten Läden nicht so sehr (am ehesten noch Subway), aber das ist mehr Persönliche Präferenz als Vegane Grundüberzeugung.