251
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by SanctimoniousApe to c/politics@lemmy.world

I've often assumed Harris didn't want to insult her boss by going against him, because I got the impression she was planning to give Netanyahu what for once she took over - especially with him escalating things further and further. Did anyone else get that vibe, or was it just wishful thinking on my part?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 125 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Despite the best economy in the world AND Netanyahu backing Trump.

The stupidity is off the charts.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The problem is the term.

Politicians and pundits talk about the economy referring to the stock market.

Citizens talk about the economy referring to the supermarket.

The US government can only directly affect the former, and most of our nation just can’t comprehend that.

Nixon attempted to freeze grocery prices for 90 days with an Executive Order. It resulted in emptying grocery stores and record inflation when the order expired. It was called the “Nixon Shock.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock

If you want the government to control the price of food, then you should probably move to a communist nation.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/business/worldbusiness/07iht-controls.4.11735373.html

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If you want the government to control the price of food, then you should probably move to a communist nation.

Don't threaten me with a good time. /s

JK. The US being the US they'd immediately turn into north Korea before adopting real communist policies.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Uh, North Korea is very much not a communist country. It’s a totalitarian state whose name says they’re a “democratic republic”, and whose leadership claim is a flavor of communism, but it is absolutely nothing of the sort.

Edit: yeah whoops, I munged the semantics of your comment

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That was my point. Most countries that try to become communist start off as soviet and then collapse into totalitarian dystopias because they consolidate too much power into the state and don't have enough safeguards to prevent overreach. Russia did the same after the revolution. Enacting democratic votes and then ignoring them because communism wasn't popular for the masses. It's a fundamental problem.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The cognitive dissonance required for the economy being both the "best " and yet also people can't afford bread is a privilege that people living pay check to paycheck simply can't afford. Child poverty hit its all time low under Biden. Then it doubled under Biden . More American's are living paycheck to paycheck than ever before: now a majority. Look at the memes and conversation happening in the memes here on lemmy. The struggle to afford basic goods and services is a constant theme.

When you gaslight people, telling them to ignore their lived experience and to "trust" an analysis of economy that clearly only serves billionaires: What do you expect that does to their trust in your rhetoric?

[-] jj122 40 points 1 week ago

Just so everyone knows. Child poverty went down because Dems had enough power to expand the child tax credit as part of Bidens American rescue plan. The expanded credit then expired and Republicans have blocked passage of the renewed expansion. This is another thing where Republicans will do anything to harm Democrats including voting against extremely popular programs. I agree that it sucks the poverty went back up, but Dems reduced it and Republicans increased it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The deciding vote on ending that tax credit was Joe Manchin.

[-] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

He not only is literally not a Democrat anymore he was only one in name only when he claimed to be. (See: Sinema). Assholes.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago

If this is the best economy in the world I don’t blame people for wanting to blow it up.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

We're still in recovery from covid, as is everyone else. As much as everyone likes to pretend it never happened, or it is ancient history, it's effects are still being seen.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago

Right? Like, four years ago we had to shutdown big chunks of the world, inject trillions of Dollars of money into circulation to keep things vaguely moving, millions of deaths, logistical and manufacturing delays galore, and people are pissed that we're not better off than we were before. So pissed that they want to take control from the people who have been turning it around and give it back to the people who fucked it up in the first place.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

"But gas prices were lower in 2020" Yeah, because most people where under lock down, laid off, or sick, you dumb fucks.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm an essential employee, and a lot of my hobbies are solo outdoor activities. so things were pretty much business as usual for me. But I remember the first few weeks of lockdown, I already commute at kind of a weird time and in a not too congested area, so I never dealt with much traffic to begin with, but there was basically no one on the roads then, and I don't think people realize how big the difference was because everyone was just stuck at home.

My car actually averaged a whole mile per gallon better than usual just from the lack of my already light traffic.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same. I was installing equipment at shut down schools 30+ minutes away for months in 2020. Roads nearly empty, schools completely empty, restaurants either boarded up, or only doing delivery and takeout, sometimes out of makeshift windows where the front door used to be, stores deserted (except for Home Depot because everyone was doing DIY projects during shutdown so they had dozens of people waiting outside like they were at a night club except everyone was standing 6 feet apart). People didn't go out.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago

Yes, but to be charitable to the people out there, they are specifically targeted by mega corporations to hole them up into a conservative-affirming digital content feed.

They are victims just as much as they are stupid.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

By that logic nazi soldiers in WWII would be victims.

I don't think the result of ignorance and stupidity are permissible.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s on an entirely different level today. Propaganda has always been useful for swaying public opinion, but we live in a world where an entire generation of the world’s most brilliant minds have been set to the task of optimizing ad revenue. And they certainly succeeded.

Unfortunately it turns out that “increasing engagement” virtually requires pigeonholing people into an ever-increasingly-radical echo chamber.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Psychology was a burgeoning field during the Nazis' time. Now psychology is much more mature as a field and applied psychology is used in software to turn everything around us into a casino for the benefit of those at the top.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

They weren't necessarily victims, but you can't just write them off as evil monsters.

We need to understandwhy people could go along with it so that we can prevent it from happening again.

It's like saying global warming is because we pissed off Almighty Zeus, and not doing anything else to address climate change.

It's good you're upset about it and admit it's a problem, but we need to actually take steps to stop it.

For decades what non voters have said for the reason they don't vote is "both parties are the same". They're obviously not, however both parties moving to the right isn't differentiating them enough for enough voters.

The solution is Dems moving left so the difference is more obvious.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Why not both?

I completely agree that we should better understand the communication and behaviors that led to this divide, but entertaining another’s ideals in no way requires acceptance of them.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

The solution is Dems moving left so the difference is more obvious.

The solution isn't for the "the Dems" to do anything. Just as AOC and Bernie constantly say, the solution is to build an actual movement of the people.

Good luck in this country though, even supposed leftists and supposed anarchists waste all day everyday chirping that the dnc did this wrong or that wrong when the reality is that if we as a country were actually doing the work the dnc and maybe even the Democratic party would be irrelevant.

Electoralism (especially in a first past the post system) is going to get you exactly as far as we are right now.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah bruh, your head is completely fucked if you think that tariffs, labor shortages, and selling $8 trillion in bonds is going to help you out at the fucking grocery store. Idiots gonna learn, I tell you what. Pardon my use of the general “you”, I don’t mean you in particular.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I totally agree with you. People are just plain stupid, and right wing politicians are really good at grifting idiots.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Harris and Biden both knew they'd take a hit for taking AIPAC money and they decided they were ok with that risk. That seems pretty stupid to me considering how close elections have been and how 88% of Americans are against the gaza war crimes.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah bruh, your head is completely fucked if you think that tariffs, labor shortages, and selling $8 trillion in bonds is going to help you out at the fucking grocery store.

Many people don't believe that Trump will actually do the things he said he'd do, because it wasn't that bad his last term and they see the reactions to his first election as hysterical in retrospect. Those that believe he will do the things he said -- a minority in his coalition I think -- are wingnuts that are in favor of those things.

It's all stupid, and leaves out that the "deep state", institutions, and moderating voices in his administration -- which Trump is looking to eliminate in his second term -- constrained him and kept the country largely business as usual despite his shenanigans. The adults in the room had the effect of saving us from a lot of Trump's worst impulses, and for people who do not pay attention to politics this made the Trump-Pence administration retroactively palatable.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
251 points (92.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2126 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS