421
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by neme@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hubi@feddit.org 172 points 2 weeks ago

Yoon cited a motion by the country's opposition Democratic Party, which has a majority in parliament, this week to impeach some of the country's top prosecutors and its rejection of a government budget proposal.

They declared martial law over a budget proposal??

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 136 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My god they are so efficient. Whole thing lasted like 3 hours

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 64 points 2 weeks ago

Don't hold you breath...

From BBC:

The South Korean military says it will maintain martial law until it is lifted by President Yoon Suk Yeol, despite the nation's parliament voting to block its enforcement, according to the country's national broadcaster.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 34 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

planet earth turns into a freaking ice ball after exchanging the sun for a blank hole

Yeah this is 100% a power grab. AFAIK there’s nothing going on right now in SK at a national level that could possibly justify the declaration of martial law countrywide.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As far as I understand, the president's decision might be void, since he was required to hold a session of the government before declaring martial law, but did not.

I predict that the military will consult their lawyers and stop enforcing it really soon.

I suspect the president either went insane or attempted some kind of a coup. His own party voting against his decision is a clear signal that it's a solo performance. He has no political backing.

I mean… if the military is behind the president (and it sounds like they just might be), this is just the beginning phase of a coup, wherein their legislature is taken out behind the shed.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is hours old, I think there might be a couple generals for sure, but the rest of the military is playing catch up. We'll see how those chips fell tomorrow morning most likely.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Judging by the unanimous decision of the parliament, the majority of soldiers will have no interest in going forward with a coup. A minority could have interest, but would soon notice they're a minority.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

No man rules alone

I suspect his presidency isn't much longer for this world.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 weeks ago

Under martial law parliament is suspended so the vote was symbolic

[-] Furball@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago

Not exactly, under the constitution if the parliament votes to suspend martial law the president must end it. A constitutional crisis is brewing

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Technically it might be, but all political power stems from the people agreeing to be governed. If they aren't represented, they won't agree to be governed for long.

Basically, the parliament can't afford to let itself be suspended. It's needed because the president is going to get dismissed after this kind of behaviour.

[-] Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

So, the following is a genuine question and not a snide remark.

Does that matter? Is the military going to respect that? I'd heard prior to this that the military had forbade parliament from gathering. What's to say they don't just side with Yoon?Certainly wouldn't be the first time in history that a nation's military has dictated the corse of the nation's civil future. I really hate asking questions like this but I'm just not familiar enough with the politics of South Korea to know if this a done and dusted thing or if the military is likely to go for a coup if Yoon pitches it.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

God, I was just breathing a sigh of relief till this poped up a moment later.

The South Korean military says it will maintain martial law until it is lifted by President Yoon Suk Yeol, despite the nation's parliament voting to block its enforcement, according to the country's national broadcaster.

Hope that's just postureing.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ooh, not great. Preview of the US in January? Except for the blocking part, that'd never happen.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, even if evidence appeared at this stage showing the election was interfered with here, the damage is done, there would be no attempt to keep office. The S.C. would rule the period for recounting the votes has passed, precedent being 2000 Florida.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

True, but I was referring to when Trump declares martial law, as he said he would. There will be no opposition from his own party as there was here.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, Republican Congress members wouldn't attempt to stop it, they endorsed it.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's possible a few might, and with the razor thin majority they have it might end up a majority opposing it, but the SCROTUS would nip any resistance in the bud regardless.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Hopefully half heartedly because I just found a live feed of people in the streets in Seoul. So they aren't exactly enforcing martial law yet.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Who's not gone, the military or the representatives

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Military. They said they're not leaving until the president stops declaring martial law.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Hopefully they're not actually doing anything though, just standing around until it's resolved.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's how it seems so far. Hoping this doesn't end badly for South Korea. The last thing we need is another dictatorship in the world.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well then democracy has fallen in that country. That blows

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not just yet, but it's dangerously close.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The populous voted whether through representatives, singular vote or any other democratic system that their parliament has the right to disband martial law. They voted to disband it and they have not disbanded. It is an act of treason unless he immediately followed the process elected and put in place by the people.

The only way forward would be to have him removed and charged with such immediately, or he is in fact a dictator.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In the end, it's what the military actually end up doing (or not doing) that will determine South Korea's fate. You're right that letting them get away with it will only encourage further lawlessness in the future even if they manage to get through this now.

EDIT: Yoon said he'd lift it, but I really hope they don't let the opposition to the rule of law go unpunished.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Who is "the military"?

[-] NanoooK@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

A clean vote, that's good.

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. This possibility has been discussed for months now. Yoon framed the cuts to his proposed budget as an "act of sympathy to the North" in his speech.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

Going full fascist to enforce austerity.

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe, keep in mind that reporting is going off the information they have. It might be deeper than that. Only time will tell.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've got to start reading Korean news

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
421 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39332 readers
3123 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS