this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
102 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

9105 readers
1961 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You comment is very confusing. I understand not supporting the gun restrictions introduced in the last 5 years, but why would you oppose the buyback program? If the government makes a citizen's property illegal to own, they should compensate the citizen.

All the data shows that law abiding gun owners aren’t much of the problem.

FTFY. Also, the issue (generally) isn't gun owners, it's their guns that get stolen, misused, etc.

Doubling down on this when we our sovereignty is threatented is just straight bonkers.

Irrelevant and nonsensical. Individual gun owners have no impact on preserving our sovereignty. Modern militaries are on a different level than "A well regulated Militia" or whatever other 2A BS this is.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Because it's a waste of money. My taxes will have to pay for this.

No one is using legally attained weapons to kill people. Spend the money on stopping guns coming across the border instead, and on better gun training programs. IMO it's actually too easy to obtain a PAL and that should be made more strenuous.

They plan on shipping the bought back guns to Ukraine which is also super embarassing. That would be a logistical nightmare. There's a reason why armies use a standardized rifle/ammo haha. What is Ukraine going to do with my now illegal semi auto .22?

Restricting weapons just props up the illegal market on them.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No one is using legally attained weapons to kill people.

The problem is, they are using legally attained weapons to kill people.

And every time they do, the news makes sure that it is described, and politicians use it as an argument for more restrict control and weird rules.

They do that because it is easy, and it does not alienate their base and lobbyists. It does not mean it will solve the problem in the long term.

Not so long ago, they banned a tamagotchi because thieves were using 15K USD devices to unlock cars.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the last time a legal weapon killed people was the 1989 montreal one?

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Montreal was a big one. I think the last big mass shootings were all smuggled from the USA, or stolen from the police (Nova Scotia 2020).

I meant murder with guns in general. It feels like there is always a pundit saying the weapon being black, or having a handgun handle increases lethality… and red makes it faster, more dakka. It feels it is more for economic reasons (block competition) than to solve any real problem.

There is this one in 2022, it is not as big, but the guy killed multiple people with legal handguns. https://siu.on.ca/en/directors_report_details.php?drid=2360

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Modern militaries are on a different level than "A well regulated Militia" or whatever other 2A BS this is.

Uh... Afghanistan would like to object?

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

If you're talking about the Taliban, I'd argue they are a full-blown military which just wasn't attached to an internationally recognized government for ~2 decades. They had professional soldiers and equipment which would way out-class even the most intense private militia in the US.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And switzerland but I guess they all have military training.

[–] bowreality@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

And are armed!!

[–] HonoredMule@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The training is what we need to promote, for sure.

I don't have a firm enough position on gun control to want it costing us money right now.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would actually support mandatory basic training. As long as they don't make me cut my hair. Lol

[–] HonoredMule@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ditto on both points. I'm genuinely struggling with the prospect of having to shorten my beard if I joined the reserves. I've been working for years to train/develop it into a distinctive style and I'm not even there yet.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

My hair is almost down to my ass and I wouldn't cut it for any reason lol

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Do you prefer the Switzerland bureaucracy than ours?

Also, not sure how that helped them with…

/Check notes on the Switzerland wars./

Afghanistan war.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well more like nobody dares attack switzerland because it would be impossible. Everyone has a bunker and an assault rifle and they know how to use it.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

They are also very friendly with everyone, try to stay neutral, and more important, hold the key to a lot of money.

But they did not achieve that just by giving people guns, they teach it in schools, hold shooting competitions, lots of bureaucracy, and you can be charged for improper use of your equipment. Their society is not as divided, and they also have good support for their citizens.

Looking around the world, the places that controlled gun violence well either banned or added more bureaucracy. But it appears that people prefer to go the Australian way.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I don't follow, care to explain, please.

Wasn't the equipment and training they got to resist many invasions over the century, always from external groups? As far as I know, Afghani gun laws are very restrictive and bureaucratic.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was responding to the idea that militias with low-power guns only can't resist a foreign military.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not really sure where you read that statement, it was not what you quoted.

But I don't know of a nation that allows civilians to buy the equipment Afghanis used to resist Russia or USA.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not really sure where you read that statement, it was not what you quoted.

It is. It literally says "well regulated militia".

But I don't know of a nation that allows civilians to buy the equipment Afghanis used to resist Russia or USA.

Admittedly I don't know what equipment they used, so can you give examples?

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, just infantry, we are talking about rocket launchers, anti-tank grenade launchers(RPG famously), LMG, manpads. Then you have things you can mount on a truck, then you have vehicles itself...

You also have support from other countries and people, sharing resources, and intelligence. You do not resist USA or Russian with just a bunch of minutemen with walmart weapons. Even harder if they do not care for civilian lives.

You might have some success disrupting some logistics in the partisan life, but not without a considerable support from modern military and allies.

well regulated militia

I might be wrong, but that person's argument seems to be about the individual owner's paper on preserving our sovereignty, independent of the calibre size.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, just infantry, we are talking about rocket launchers, anti-tank grenade launchers(RPG famously), LMG, manpads. Then you have things you can mount on a truck, then you have vehicles itself...

So admittedly I know next to nothing about this stuff, but you can make RPGs if you're dedicated. The IRA did it. IEDs will also get you pretty far.

I might be wrong, but that person's argument seems to be about the individual owner's paper on preserving our sovereignty, independent of the calibre size.

By low-power I meant things you can get legally, so not sniper rifles and shit.

You also have support from other countries and people, sharing resources, and intelligence. You do not resist USA or Russian with just a bunch of minutemen with walmart weapons. Even harder if they do not care for civilian lives.

You might have some success disrupting some logistics in the partisan life, but not without a considerable support from modern military and allies.

The Irish and Algerians did it.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Modern militaries are on a different level than “A well regulated Militia” or whatever other 2A BS this is.

.22 will be useless and they start shelling us.

I feel like anyone LARPing or dreaming with military campaign would be better served by practicing with RC planes and drones, tanking cool pictures, breathtaking videos, or just doing cool aerial tricks.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm an experienced drone pilot and that's how I would plan to contribute.

The Canadian Rangers use tikka t3x rifles which we can still legally buy. In the event of war you probably want something that can fire 7.62 NATO as that will be the ammo which is distributed.

Canada is mostly wilderness. A bolt action rifle still has a place in your pack. It is reliable and simple. Lightweight.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

My 80yo father-in-law has some drones, he will be more useful than me, I should probably save for a good one and start practicing.

Found some tikka t3x on the used listing here, I was trying to find their brochure to see which model they recommend for conversion to 7.62, I imagine a .308 Win would work.