694
Oo rah (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lionel@endlesstalk.org 60 points 11 months ago

Is that a stupid question? Like aren’t most people negatively impacted

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 38 points 11 months ago

I imagine that they’re fishing for compliments regarding leadership training, job placement, etc.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

“I taught this guys wife how to fuck 10 guys.”

[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Should've said nine.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Well hopefully their social media PR person learned a valuable lesson- Don't ask a question on the internet unless you're really prepared for people to give you an answer you're not going to like.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Nope. Most people in the military aren't combat troops. A military the size of the one the US has requires a fuck ton of non-combat positions to function.

[-] jawa21@startrek.website 34 points 11 months ago

I think it was The Onion that made an article promoting a new Call of Duty game where all you do is fix humvees and wait on watch.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

So you get booted for smoking week?

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I was friends with a military guy who used to hate the whole "thank you for your service" thing. He was like "I work in a fucking office in Dallas".

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 5 points 10 months ago

"Thank you for your service" seems to be what people say when they claim to support servicemen/women and then try to defund the VA, Tricare, and post-service mental care.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

For most service members the Military is basically just a guaranteed job with a REALLY good on site gym membership

[-] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Eh, military has a lot of jobs outside of combat situations, so idk if "most" ex-military are negatively impacted although I imagine anyone who's seen combat is.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

I doubt most are negatively impacted overall. Though those who are, are often extremely negatively impacted (PTSD, serious permanent injury, death).

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

I see a lot of service members in my job… trust me a large percentage are negatively impacted..

[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I’d think death would extremely negatively impact a person.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Wow - never seen just how, while tragic, low the death rate is.

https://dcas.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/app/summaryData/deaths/byYearManner

So many self inflicted! And plenty of illness.

[-] Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

What especially sticks out to my laymen self is the trend where active duty numbers decrease over time, but self-inflicted casualties continue to increase.

Additionally, the 2nd last page - from 2010 ~ 2019 the total deaths trend down from 1,485 to 893. Impressive! However, self-infliction continues to rise. :(

Thank you for sharing!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It is my (possibly flawed) understanding that because of improvement in personal armor, armored vehicles, etc. deaths in combat have in general dropped, but the psychological repercussions have not. So you still have plenty of people with severe PTSD that end up being part of that terrible 'self-inflicted' statistic.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
694 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

5234 readers
482 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS