156
submitted 9 months ago by kescusay@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Just a reminder that it's still February, people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I don't want to be a doomer, but I do kind of feel like climate change is going to get worse and worse and we will pay a terrible price.

I'm not one of those "civilization will end" types, but I think there will be a lot more refugees and a lot more war. If the Himalayan ice caps melt, a lot of Asia is very fucked.

[-] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago

There's a pretty big difference between "it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better", and "it's already over, we're all fucked".

The original comment presents things poorly: we are past several "points of no return", but saying the point of no return implies there's nothing to be done.

Additionally the last point is... pretty much entirely wrong. We have absolutely made significant and noticeable progress against climate change. It's not enough yet, but it's absolutely not nothing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I understand that. I'm just suggesting that doomers might not be 100% wrong because I think a lot of bad stuff is going to happen, so we shouldn't just dismiss dire predictions entirely.

I just don't think this will be the end of our species or even human civilization everywhere. But in some places? Quite possibly.

[-] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah I agree, I just don't call "stuff's gonna be bad" doomerism (it's pretty clear at this point). I call "this is the end and there's nothing we can do" doomerism.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Ok, fair enough.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

If everyone's living in refugee and migrant camps, how is that not a collapse of civilization?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Well, for one thing, the vast majority of civilization does not depend on the Himalayas for water. But many people do.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Climate change and global warming are not localized to the Himalayas.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Okay? I still never said everyone would live in refugee and migrant camps...

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I’m not specifically saying that suddenly the planet is going to swallow up humanity as a whole. But, as you said — climate refugees — plus an uncertain food and water supply, and disastrous weather are going to cause humanity to fight amongst themselves. We will end up destroying ourselves to “survive.”

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I think there will be plenty of places where life will go on without everyone having to till the soil. But there will be a lot more death and pain.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

The death and pain will come from the people in bad areas attacking those in the good ones.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That is not something you can predict with any certainty. That may happen and it may not. We can't know at this point. But there will definitely be a price paid for our continued fossil fuel use.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Based on what you know of humanity and its history, where would you place your bet?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I do not pretend to know the future.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I’m not asking you be clairvoyant. I’m asking you to make an educated guess on the outcome of humanity based on what you know about humanity.

You can refuse, but just say you’re refusing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

What I know about humanity is that we spent the vast amount of our history as small bands of nomadic hunter-gatherers, so any prediction you make is based on a very tiny fraction of our history.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Tiny, but important. Question still stands.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The answer to the question is that civilization is an unnatural state for humanity to be in, so it is too unpredictable at present. And since there has never been a global civilization collapse, in part because there has never been a global threat like this and in part because the world has never been globalized like this, we are in completely unknown territory.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 3 points 9 months ago

You are the correct one here, I think tsonfeir is maybe trying to riddle you or something: the truth is at some point the sun will extend out beyond Earth and any civilization left here will die out, human or otherwise?

Not sure why that is that interesting to them or why they are demanding you say it.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Moat people in the first world will be fine at the small cost of thousands of dead poor people. But then again never mind the poor people.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
156 points (96.4% liked)

News

23413 readers
2401 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS