633
submitted 7 months ago by kinther@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The investigation is tied to an incident on an Alaska Airlines flight in early January. Boeing also told a Senate panel that it cannot find a record of the work done on the Alaska plane.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sadly nothing Boeing has done is criminal in the US even though it absolutely should be. It's just the bog standard corporate pursuit of profit at the expense of all else. Cutting corners, ignoring safety, rushing everything, and all with fewer people to do the work than are necessary. If Boeing is found criminally guilty for that half the corporations in the US are in trouble.

No, this is just political theater, much like the TSA is. Boeing has fucked up enough that people are starting to take notice, so this is just a little reminder to them that they need to stop fucking up quite so publicly. The executives will sweat a little, temporarily improve things, and then go right back to their usual bullshit in a year or two when things calm down. Worst case scenario they'll put out a series of BP style "We're sorry" videos where they emphasize how much quality and safety supposedly mean to them.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

much like the TSA is

While mostly true, the TSA was also a stealth jobs program for flunkies who couldn't get jobs anywhere else (and to help Bush pump his jobs numbers, which were abysmal). You kind of have to be a motivated fucking idiot to spend every day undermining the fourth amendment and acting like you're doing a service to society. Especially with all the evidence of TSA agents using their authority to just outright steal shit. They're not hiring the best, and everyone knows that they hire the worst of the worst for these jobs, so it's hard to even call it "theater" anymore when everyone sees right through it. Hypernormalization.

[-] quicksand@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

While you're correct in your assessment, I'd like to remind people to not be assholes to TSA when they're going through security. They're people just trying to do their jobs like the rest of us. It's a shit job with no recognition and a ton of public contact. The agents aren't there because they want to stomp on your rights; they have bills to pay and people to take care of.

[-] vorpuni@jlai.lu 7 points 7 months ago

Being assholes to them is irrational, they can be more of a nuisance to you than you can be to them. However I disagree people doing those jobs deserve any respect, doing evil because it's a job and it pays and they can't think of anything better… that doesn't mean it suddenly becomes acceptable. The pawns don't feel like they're responsible for abuses.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 7 months ago

Sadly nothing Boeing has done is criminal in the US even though it absolutely should be.

I doubt that you know whether Boeing has or has not broken any laws.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

OK, well nothing there's anything public about anyway. It's always possible they've been embezzling or I don't know, running a drug smuggling ring out of their warehouses, but nothing they've probably done is illegal. Remember this is all just a response to the multiple accidents related to manufacturing defects in their planes. At this moment the worst charge they're looking at is maybe criminal negligence.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Cover up is where I'd put money. Supplying a federal agency with falsified documents or otherwise lying would start getting into criminal territory. Though I agree that we, the public, have no evidence of that.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 7 months ago

He didn’t say illegal, he said criminal.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

What is your point?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

They're being investigated under "Conspiracy to Defraud the United States", which does have criminal penalties.

Now, that's a prison sentence of up to 5 years. People died because of the decisions by Boeing executives, and countless others were put at risk. There should be a whole lot more here that they should be charged with, but probably won't.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

And when was the last time that the US sent to jail anybody in the C-suite of a major US company?

In the US (and not only) the Law might be on the book but it's most definitelly selectivelly applied and all we've seen when it comes to the top people in such "too big to fail" companies is settlements with no admission of guilt.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

I don't disagree. I also think people should present the VW Diesel Emissions scandal accurately.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Oh yeah, that stuff was a complete total disgrace and partly why I wrote "In the US (and not only)".

Protecting C-suite types in big companies is almost always how things work in Western Nations, even the supposedly more honest ones.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 3 points 7 months ago

The FAA and the DOJ are not the same as TSA. Not at all.

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

An enterprising DA should charge a corporation with murder under the personhood standard established by citizens united and go for the death penalty . Revoke their ability to exist in the state.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

If someone bought off that the bolts were reinstalled they can get in trouble for falsifying inspection records.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
633 points (98.9% liked)

News

23161 readers
2799 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS