I’m really interested in why apple was so much against it before but are for it now. Maybe there’s an obvious reason, maybe not.
But I’m too tired to google this and dive further in.
It’s actually a very soft bill, it has no requirements to make hardware that is actually pro-consumer.
Which is likely why they switched to supporting it. It was this or more strict requirements in the future.
That's disheartening but I figured it had to be something like that. Ultimately then the danger will be thinking "great, now right to repair is fixed", plus Apple gets to claim they were altruistic. Ugh.
We fixed right to repair in 2023 just like we fixed racism by electing Obama in 2008
Can’t wait to see how you fix your healthcare system.
Duh, ObamaCare, what more could we ask for?
Apple won't be forced to change their current business practice if soldering everything to the logic board, security chips disabling devices after repairs unless unlocked with their proprietary software, etc, so it won't affect their monopolizing of the Apple repair market. They'll just have to offer logic boards for sale with a one pg PDF showing how to replace the board, and maybe they'll make the security software fix more available (which would still be huge). But 99% of their users likely wouldn't do it themselves anyway.
Either way, this is still a huge step in the right direction though!
When I worked at Apple, much of the repairing wasn't modular. Simply device replacement at a high fixed cost. They'd then cannibalize the surrendered devices for parts or repair them cheap, then make them replacement devices for the next person to come in. It made huge money.
Apple was against it because if you have parts, you can build counterfit iPhones and stuff (read about that rationale years ago, take it with a grain of salt). Also, the repair market is quite lucrative forcing customers to buy new devices than actually fixing them. They were doing this with iPods way back in the day with irreplaceable batteries or batteries so pricey, "you may as well buy a new one".
No idea why they changed their tune. I could only imagine their revenue streams have leaned more into software now but I'm just an idiot online, what do I know.
If it's made from all genuine parts from the manufacturer, is it really a counterfeit device?
Does this mean that the ice cream machines at McDonald's will be working? 😉
Seriously though, this is great news.
Apple probably figured away to make more money this way
Those tools and parts are NOT going to be cheap.
Microsoft just started selling spare parts for an xbox controller.
Fixing a drifting thumbstick is 80% the cost of a new controller in parts alone. You can fix it for $5 if you go aftermarket and are happy desoldering over 10 points to remove it.
Which, as I understand it, is kinda the point of the bills too. As in, if there is documentation and it's reasonably easy to dis- and re-assemble, there can be a (bigger) market for spare parts.
The problem is that the thumbsticks are soldered onto the motherboard. Microsoft's "fix" is replacing the whole motherboard, when the sticks should really be swappable.
In a Nintendo Switch, the sticks are held in by screws and connect via a ZIF connector.
OIC, makes sense.
To diagnose the fault you need a MacBook Pro Engineer Edition $10,000, Diagnostic Software $10,000 and Diagnostic Cable $10,000.
Then there's the annual subscription to be able to buy parts , guess how much?
Don't forget the new and improved $50 Apple I Polishing Cloth 2 Pro
They also do a non-Pro version but it can only polish at one-tenth the speed.
Its probably some watered down right to repair bill and the only reason apple supported it is so they can claim that theres already a rtr bill when someone wants a proper one.
I dunno, even Rossman was for the bill but confounded by apples support.
Probably going to try to do the same thing to this bill that was done to the NY Right to Repair bill: Gavin Newsom will alter the bill slightly just before signing it that leaves a big gaping loophole for companies like Apple.
Does the bill have any provision mandating that parts and repairs be fairly priced (with some reasonable legal definition for "fairly")? Or is apple going to charge $2000 for a replacement iphone screen part?
There might be:
The bill would define the following terms: “documentation,” “electronic or appliance product,” “product,” “fair and reasonable terms,” “service dealer,” and “trade secret.”
https://californiaglobe.com/articles/sb-244-right-to-repair/
That's great
It's just good business.
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!