370
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

At her sentencing hearing, Yvonne St Cyr did not express regret or accept any responsibility for her actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

A Jan. 6 defendant who claimed she believed she had the right to climb over broken glass to enter the Capitol was sentenced to 2 and a half years in federal prison on Wednesday.

Yvonne St Cyr — who during her trial in March was found guilty of two felony counts of civil disorder as well as several misdemeanors — was sentenced by U.S. District Judge John Bates to 30 months behinds bars, 36 months of supervised release and a $2,000 restitution to the Architect of the Capitol.

After her trial, St Cyr had said in a Facebook livestream that she wasn't sure that the case would ever move to sentencing because "the truth" would come out before then.

“Their s---'s gonna blow up!" she said. "So, just keep watching Tucker, keep spreading the truth, keep talking about the corruption, keep sharing, and we will bring the system doooooowwwwn.”

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago

"She also repeated her claim that the last presidential election was stolen."

...and...

"In a Facebook livestream after her sentencing, St Cyr also said she hadn’t filed taxes since 2019, and she encouraged her followers not to pay their taxes."

So she supported the Trump presidency...but refused to pay tax 2 years into his presidency?

[-] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, you don’t get it. Taxes are bad because government, and Trump is good because he’s not government, especially when he was president but also now and forever. And government is communism, so we can’t pay taxes. Obviously!

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

jfc is this what it feels like to do the mental gymnastics of those kind of people??? I felt like an idiot reading that one over and over lol

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Thing is, it's not hard for them to do it. They're so far from reality, such a mentally is THEIR reality.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Reading this gave me an aneurysm. It's even worse knowing people believe it

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sending their best as usual

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago

Unrepentant means she should have a longer sentence.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the desired effect of the right wing media echo chamber.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

Wow, let's cover some of the gems there.

After her trial, St Cyr had said in a Facebook livestream that she wasn't sure the case would ever move to sentencing because "the truth" would come out before then.

I'm sure "the truth" is coming right after infrastructure month.

"So just keep watching Tucker, keep spreading the truth, keep talking about the corruption, keep sharing, and we will bring the system doooooowwwwn.”

Tucker Carlson's show was canceled.

At her sentencing hearing Wednesday, St Cyr's attorney, Nicole Owens, said her client was at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, because of a “misguided sense of duty.”

C'mon don't leave us hanging, who was the source of that misguided sense? Also, getting ice cream on your first date with someone only to find out they're lactose intolerant, that's misguided. Attempting to overthrow the government, that's a few levels past misguided. Just saying.

“I’ve been on a spiritual journey,” St Cyr said. Then she launched into a bizarre 45-minute rant — until the judge cut her off with a stern warning to wrap up — on a series of topics, including her beliefs about the air we breathe, her spiritual being, radio frequencies, her difficult upbringing and a woman she watched being arrested on a playground during the Covid pandemic.

Actually I blame the judge on this one. After sitting for weeks listening to this lady's crazy Facebook streams, figuring "what's the worse that could happen if I let this lady speak freely?", you're just opening yourself up for that.

That said, I'm sure the 45-minute jam packed insane stream of consciousness diatribe was something to behold.

She also talked about her actions during the Capitol riot. She didn’t express regret or accept any responsibility for her actions that day, and she indicated that she wasn’t concerned about the prospect of serving jail time

Shocking. Been a pattern of that with folks who attempted to overthrow the government. It's like these small jail sentences aren't deterrent enough.

“I did the right thing,” St Cyr said about her actions on Jan. 6. “I know it sounds delusional.”

Oh sweetheart, it's a bit past just sounding that way.

In a Facebook livestream after her sentencing, St Cyr also said she hadn’t filed taxes since 2019, and she encouraged her followers not to pay their taxes.

I foresee another court case in her future, just a hunch.

[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Why the hell did the judge let it go on for 45 minutes?

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because if you step on them in any way they’ll file an appeal claiming you’re a biased judge. Easier to just let her rant and then get sentenced.

[-] Rootiest@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Those poor court stenographers

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Couldn't look away from the train wreck, probably

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

I thought the same thing about the 45 mins & the judge at first too, but now I wonder if she’s involved in any other crimes of this type, maybe the 45 min rant could somehow be used as evidence against her. So maybe it was smart in some way? This is my head-canon at least.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

“I know it sounds delusional.”

Just the teeniest bit of rationality poking through there.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, she did the right thing to get behind bars.

"So, just keep watching Tucker, keep spreading the truth

Now, which one? Tucker or truth? You definitely cannot have both.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

She means "Truth", not to be confused with the other kind.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

What a fucking dipshit.

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

How brainwashed could someone be…? - Yes!

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Stuff like this basically confirms to me that all religion is made-up bullshit.

People keep saying "they wouldn't have believed it so strongly if it wasn't true!!"

Motherfucker we have VIDEO evidence of Trump lying and people still believe.

Religion, MAGA... It's just all cults from top to bottom.

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I am also not a big fan of religion, but I wouldn’t put this in the same basket. This is more like a cult or a sect, where members are blindly believing what their master says.

This reminds me more of Jim Jones and his followers, resulting in the Jonestown massacre, rather than the average religious person (except radical evangelicals, taliban and such extremists).

[-] BadEngineering@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

And the distinction between those two is???? A religion is merely a cult that has gathered enough followers to go mainstream.

[-] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There are many religious people (at least in Europe) who are occasionally going to church, but other than that harmless, while the other ones are dangerous, because fanatic in their beliefs.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

So religion is a mostly apathetic cult?

My parents spent their entire lives running around after the church handing out leaflets, setting up or taking down after the various events, organising childcare duties so that people could basically dump their snotty brats on them for a day.

They never did get any thanks for it. Cults use people, so did the church, they tried to guilt trip my parents into thinking they had to do these things for the church, the fact that it wasn't overtly evil is mostly simply because it's been around for so long it's got boring.

The church is rolling in money why can't they pay people to do this stuff? Oh yeah, that's right because they don't have to because they have brainwashed people into thinking that it's about community or something well if it was really about community they'd say thanks at least.

Also some of the sermons the pastor gave bordered on religious fanatic. Fortunately he's about 98 and therefore not really a major ongoing concern. But still, the things he advocates for are cultish.

[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

These people are just plain dangerous.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Lead poisoning

[-] Narrrz@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

if she still thinks she did the right thing, the locking her away from civilised society is the right thing to do.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Doesn't that mean her only regret is to being caught? She'll be the same person in 2.5 years.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

She's deranged looking. A byproduct of America's culture of excess, greed, and stupidity. You can see it in her eyes. She's never had to fight for anything in her entire life, and she lacks any critical thinking skills. She literally thought she could overthrow the US government with an iphone.

so sad. so brainwashed.

and no on seems to be holding fox news accountable for the damage theyve done to so many vulnerable humans.

[-] Kandorr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

When I was little I went to a small school. All of us were in all of the same classes. We had to go at the pace of the slowest kids. I hated it then, and welcomed going into faster tracks when I hit high school.

Sadly, life is like those early classrooms...the dimmer bulbs will always hold us up.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Someone canonized cheese?

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Honestly, this is the most respectable thing they could do. If the US were facing widespread election tampering, it’s your civic duty to do something about that (ideally not by jan. 6ing it, but if you believe they’re perpetuating fraud against the country, I can see how people who worship Thomas Jefferson are swayed to revolution…).

The ones who apologize and say they weren’t a true believer were I guess just there to fuck things up? That’s definitely worse imo.

[-] query@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Being able to admit you were wrong when faced with the facts would be the better position.

If it was truly about believing that there was fraud, and not just that they had to take action because their guy lost, they should've broken away at some point with loss after loss after loss in trying to uncover that fraud.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

If they’re reasonable, logical people, but not everyone is. I’m willing to believe that there’s been a concerted effort to brainwash half the country, but if they’re smart enough to see the fake now, I think they should have been smart enough not to go all in on revolution then.

Perhaps I should rephrase it: I actually believe this person might have believed they were doing the right thing. The ones who immediately changed their minds? Not at all.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

but if they’re smart enough to see the fake now, I think they should have been smart enough not to go all in on revolution then.

It might be this idea that keeps some people from publicly stating they were wrong.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

That’s fair. To be honest, I don’t know how to have this conversation in a way that doesn’t reinforce these beliefs.

How/can we talk about whether these people were deceived or are themselves grifters and/or violent people looking for an excuse without reinforcing those beliefs?

Also, any tips for talking to your regular old MAGA head who wasn’t at Jan. 6 about politics? Because what I’m doing isn’t working, but I tend to phrase things bluntly/aggressively (not sure of the word, but it’s not my intent to be as off putting as it seems to come across), so that’s probably on me.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I can see how people who worship Thomas Jefferson are swayed to revolution

Bold of you to think they remember even a little of their high school history classes.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, they have no idea about anything that actually happened, they just like Glenn Beck’s interpretation of Jefferson

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
370 points (96.5% liked)

News

23259 readers
2946 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS