689
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 62 points 3 months ago

It's abundantly clear only the minority of the court still has their shame center in tact

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Can't be ashamed if you have literally no morals or scruples points to head

[-] nadram@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Give companies the right to buy blocks of residential housing, remove rent increase caps, kick out those who can't afford rent anymore, send the now homeless to privately owned prisons -> maximum profit for the rich!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

The Supreme Court has nothing but contempt for the people of the US. They've proven that.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Well. The majority anyway.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Typical conservative behavior. Just punish harder and that solves everything.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

I’ve heard my own family members advocate for using weapons against homeless people stealing, and they are liberal. The hatred exists in much more Americans than you probably think, and they aren’t all conservative.

Americans are extremely violent people, Supreme Court just confirms that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

punishment as scapegoating by controlling the frame

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Can’t be ashamed when you’re flying on an all expenses paid vacation to the Caribbean

[-] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago

There's not much the Supreme Court has done in the last couple of years that they shouldn't be ashamed of.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago

Why don't they just stop being poor? 🤷‍♂️ /s

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 3 months ago

They should just pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Just like I did with mommy and daddy's money. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

No, it’s ok, it’s what supply-side Jesus would have wanted!

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

HUMANITY should be ashamed of this. They’re running news stories about a SC justice’s wife flying flags at one of their multiple homes and we still harass poor folk on park benches?

Demolish the planet and build the bypass already.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

San Francisco tried this path eons ago. Didn't go so well then: https://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/s-f-abandons-matrix-program-but-brown-says-2999337.php

Let's see how it goes this time.

[-] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Honestly, the SC ruling on homelessness is at least #3 on the list of things they should be ashamed of. Below making bribing judges and presidential criminality legal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ToyotathaJester@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Can't they just like.... stop being poor or something?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Modern self-proclaimed "conservatives" are incapable of shame. Its one of the requirements.

These are the people that tell scientists that the proven science they benefit from every day is bullshit because they feel that the reality is different, proudly, arrogantly, and with a straight face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Extreme Court

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 months ago

I was shamed to a BIGGER RV

Clarence Thompson

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cmoney@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

The ones blatantly taking brides belong in prison and not a minimum one either, one of those pound me in the ass ones.

[-] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 6 points 3 months ago

brides

You mean bribes? XD

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

illegally smol bribs

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah Prima nocte is what got York sacked

[-] CynicusRex@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

“I see you have no apple, therefore you owe us an apple.”

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

"And now, for our next trick, we will proceed to criminalizing poverty!"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
689 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS