257
submitted 2 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

Attack on free speech by the free speech guy.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago

Is this the judge that owns Tesla stock, or was that a different Elon case?

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 75 points 2 months ago

Different case, same judge. This guy is so ridiculously reliable as a right wing shill that plaintiffs seek him out.

Under the federal code of judges' conduct, "a judge should recuse himself if a reasonable person in possession of the relevant facts would believe that the judge has reason for bias. And there is good reason to think that this rule covers O'Connor," [Harvard Law School Professor Noah] Feldman wrote. "Because Musk is so closely identified with both X and Tesla, Tesla share prices are arguably affected by the performance of X."

Feldman also said "the fact that Musk's lawyers appear to have sought a way to appear before O'Connor strengthens the case for recusal." X's claim that Texas is an appropriate venue because it has advertisers and users located in Texas is "meager, but perhaps less absurd than those used in some other forum-shopping situations," he wrote.

[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago
[-] Catma@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

A shitty Texas judge that isn't Matthew Kacsmaryk? Well I'll be damned.

This guy's whole career is despicable.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago
[-] moody 66 points 2 months ago

Texas judge rules on case before hearing case.

We all know where this is going.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

This was a motion to dismiss a fairly standard thing for a judge to rule on before a trial. The only effect of this ruling is that the case wasn't dismissed. And if it was dismissed at this stage it likely would have been done without prejudice. Meaning that they could just refile elsewhere.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 13 points 2 months ago

Don't forget to mention this is a corrupt judge they specifically went to. He also owns Tesla stock, which is an obvious conflict of interest to anyone (except Republicans).

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

Reed Charles O'Connor (born June 1, 1965) is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. He was nominated by President George W. Bush in 2007.

O'Connor has become a "go-to" favorite for conservative lawyers, as he reliably rules against Democratic policies and for Republican policies.[1][2] Attorneys General in Texas appear to strategically file cases in O'Connor's jurisdiction so that he will hear them.[3]

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 months ago

Truly a banana republic.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

Maybe we shouldn’t let people choose where things are filed

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago

Fuck Texas.

Source: I live in Texas. Well, ‘live’ is a kind way to say that I inhabit the state. It’s more like I just kind of exist there in perpetual anger and frustration.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Also in Texas because twenty years ago, my beloved wife HAD to have a house and there was no way in hell that was happening in California.

Today the wife is gone, the house is gone, the dogs are dead, and the daughter is grown and living in a far away civilized state that respects her right to exist.

And I'm still here. I pretty much don't leave the house anymore except to go to work and get groceries. So very, very tired of everything here, but no viable way out in the foreseeable future.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I’m sorry. I hope you’re able to find a viable way out sooner rather than later, and fwiw there are many of us who feel this way. Take care :)

[-] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago

Come to Chicago. It's amazing.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

lol they heard about ads being displayed next to fucked up shit, because of randomness and whatever, needed more than one ad to be displayed to show X product next to fucked up shit, and apparently that's deceptive because not literally every user saw that company next to that specific fucked up post.

Cool.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

I'm sure the Republicans who claim we need Guns to Protect Ourselves Against Tyranny will be LOUD and ANGRY about Elon Musk shopping for a Judge who stands to GAIN MONEY if he Rules in Elons favor!

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

America, where it's easier to break half your workforce's employment agreements than an ad buy contract.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe more hurricanes will end up being a good thing.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Everything is bigger in ^te^X^as^

--

oh look, he entered from the port side of Houston opposite the pan handle, now it's ^te^XXX^as^

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

"Also, why keep pretending? Texas judge immediately declares case won by Musk, saves everyone time they could be spending on paid vacations instead."

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
257 points (97.4% liked)

News

23376 readers
2336 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS