615
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

GOP lawmakers and analysts virtually unanimous that Trump was second best to Harris in first presidential debate

Donald Trump’s campaign was in damage control mode on Wednesday amid widespread dismay among supporters over a presidential debate performance that saw Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent, repeatedly goad him into going wildly off-message and missing apparent opportunities to tackle her on policy.

Even with Trump insisting to have won the debate “by a lot”, Republicans were virtually unanimous that Trump had come off second best in a series of exchanges that saw the vice-president deliberately bait him on his weak points while he responded with visible anger.

The Republican nominee – who took the unusual step afterwards of visiting the media spin room, a venue normally frequented only by candidates’ surrogates – was non-committal on Wednesday to the Harris campaign’s proposal for a second debate. Despite widespread opinion to the contrary, Trump suggested she needed it because she had lost. “I’d be less inclined to because we had a great night. We won the debate,” he told Fox & Friends.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 54 points 6 days ago

Kamala's campaign: we're going to bait him at the debate.

Trump's staff: she's going to try to bait you.

Everyone: Kamala is going to bait Trump.

Trump: LOOK! BAIT! NOM

They specifically tried to prepare him for this, they knew it was coming, and this was the result. How can he possibly be prepared to meet with world leaders?

[-] elrik@lemmy.world 70 points 6 days ago

What kind of lame equivocation is "second best?" If he's "second best" in a debate with two people, then that means HE LOST.

Are these GOP lawmakers and analysts so spineless and beholden to Trump that they cannot discuss this as just one more - in a long list - of his failures?

[-] Enkrod@feddit.org 24 points 6 days ago

It wasn't that long ago when Republicans complained about participation trophies and how, at sporting events in schools, the ones who did not win still were acknowledged for their effort. They were complaining that it would make children weak, not want to compete, not give their best effort if they got recognition without being the top dog.

Now they demand their participation trophy and it better come with tendies!

[-] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago

Are these GOP lawmakers and analysts so spineless and beholden to Trump that they cannot discuss this as just one more - in a long list - of his failures?

Yes :)

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

They probably don't want their inboxes filled with bomb and rape threats from the very domestic terrorists they radicalized.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Emtity_13@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 6 days ago

R/conservative is in shambles right now, it’s kinda funny to watch

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 32 points 6 days ago

It really is a cesspool, they're tripling down now stating immigrants are eating pets, kidnapping kids in pedophile rings and then cannibalizing their victims. Total nutcase stuff.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I saw Sarah Good with the Devil! I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil! You can't fact check me! I WATCHED IT ON TV!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 6 days ago

It's just the_donald now.

The whole party got taken over by crazies, and all the normal people are realising and getting out.

Guess it's hard to argue about child starvation being a matter of personal responsibility when the person next to you is wearing a KKK hood with a swastika on it.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago

and all the normal people are realising and getting out.

No. Unfortunately not. They are just shutting up about it because they're embarrassed.

Though that was one of the first steps the country took to move past GWB (though unfortunately they moved to the right)... People becoming embarrassed to admit they voted for and/or supported him.

I can speak from personal experience as the first presidential election I voted in was 2004 and at that time I had just begun my deconversion process from Evangelical Christianity, and I voted for Bush.

I still cringe when I think about it. And it was within 4 years that I had become a progressive atheist. So maybe we're not entirely screwed (though these people don't seem to have the ability to think rationally that came to me naturally).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 16 points 6 days ago

What did they expect, he’s so old… why do they make him keep running?

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

It's my turn to say it now:

Doesn't he look tired?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago

Unprepared my ass. I watched the whole debate. He prepared his lies and bullshit.

[-] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

OK so Biden had a bad debate, was visibly incoherent for a while beforeheand, and they took him out of the race.

Now Trump has had a bad debate and has been visibly incoherent for years. Is the GOP going to take him out of the race for a stronger candidate?

I don't want to make a false equivalency, these are different parties and different candidates; Trump supporters are more loyal than usual, and he would take them with him as he's not likely to accept his exclusion, so the GOP taking Trump out of the race is riskier than Dems taking Biden out of the race.

But, seen from the left, conservatives are the ones with a reputation for ruthless pragmatism when it comes to electoral politics. They're the ones who sacrifice their values by voting for candidates that do advance their goals.

A lot of leftists, out of idealism, wouldn't vote for Clinton in 2016 or Biden in 2020; meanwhile evangelicals made the pragmatic decision to vote for Trump, the least christian man in the whole GOP, because he furthers their anti-abortion agenda. I argue that conservatives are absolutely correct in this, voting for a candidate that you don't like just to advance your goals is the correct approach to representative democracy. My evidence for this is that evangelical voters were rewarded for their vote when of Roe v Wade was overruled thanks to judges from the Trump administration.

So i think, if the GOP replaces Trump but keeps an equally extremist agenda, there's a world where electoral pragmatism causes those voters to transfer over, leading to better odds of a GOP victory. And a conservative presidency other than Trump would push their agenda more efficiently than the first Trump presidency did or than a second Trump presidency would.

Uh... So DON'T do that. That should not happen. It would be the right thing for the GOP to do, which means it's the wrong thing and i hope it doesn't happen.

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago

The thing that allowed the Democrats to switch candidates was that the Democratic National Convention had not happened yet, which is when the candidate is officially locked in as the party's candidate on ballots for president.

The Republican National Convention was mid July. Trump and Vance are locked in. To swap candidates now would be considerably more difficult for them (not to mention having to fight against a self centered toddler that will refuse to let anyone other than him run).

Swapping out candidates would be good for the Republicans. The process of swapping out candidates would not be.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I'm wondering if Biden withdrew after the rnc so he would be locked in. Not withstanding the pressure he faced.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

meanwhile evangelicals made the pragmatic decision to vote for Trump, the least christian man in the whole GOP, because he furthers their anti-abortion agenda. I

Conservatives get abortions as soon as their own daughters get pregnant. They’re consummate hypocrites. Voting republican has always been about keeping workers deprived of rights and wage increases. No conservative gives a shit about the culture war stuff. The culture war is and has always been a distraction from creating welfare states like in EU.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The culture war is an important piece of the conservative agenda- it isolates and eliminates the various groups that will group together to support non-conservatives.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

They cannot swap him out because he will not cooperate. Attempting to swap him out would do nothing but split the vote for them.

Repubs have spent decades propagandizing their fear-addicted voters with racist delusions. Donald has taken over that mechanism.

The sane but sociopathic Repub leadership is experiencing the classic trope of a monster they thought was tame (the racist voters they have been agitating) turning on them (a dementia patient they have no control over blathering about eating cats during the debate).

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

He really can't drop out. He could be replaced but the legal maze of local and state deadlines and printed paper ballots that would have to be destroyed would abridge on early voting rights.

Rfk is having that problem right now in a few states. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/09/north-carolina-robert-kennedy-early-voting-trump-sabotage.html

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago

Hey now, let's be fair!

It's entirely possible he rigorously prepared and that was genuinely the best he could do.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

He did say that he watched the news. If he didn’t prepared, how else would he have known about people eating cats? Checkmate liberals.

load more comments (2 replies)

"IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?!!!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago
[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago

I'm surprised nobody is going after him for how low energy he was at the debate. He looked like he was gonna fall asleep. The only time his eyes opened wide was when she called out his crowd sizes

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

I'm surprised nobody is going after him for how low energy he was at the debate.

That was the least of his failings.

The blatant lying about pretty much everything is (and has always been) a much more serious problem with him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago

Republicans: "What a bad and unprepared debate that was! He didn't even get to the part about how life begins at conception and guns are more important than children!"

[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Business interests, evangelicals, and cops/white supremacists.

Oh yeah, and that 50+ year campaign of gerrymandering, voter suppression (e.g. vote on tuesday, in person, during business hours, no time off work), abstracting the election process away from the ballot, and designing the court system to favor conservative calls in disputed elections.

America has a rather anti-democratic voting system...

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago

Well, well, well, if it isn't the consequences of your own actions.

[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Well it seems that Trump was a Biden 2.0 in this debate

[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

Nah. Biden was old and tired. Trump is a bumbling insane person who was easily led by the nose. A strong woman of color made trump look incredibly weak to a base made up of racist whites. Trump was obviously the worst performance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
615 points (98.4% liked)

News

22877 readers
2663 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS