818
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 113 points 1 month ago

Klingons are amazing. Another example:

[-] hamms@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I also really appreciated Worf and Martok's take on Garak's struggles with claustrophobia

Martok: There is no greater enemy than one's own fears.

Worf: It takes a brave man to face them.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Can we just give a hand to the who ST team who whiplashed Klingons from a poorly defined eternal enemy into one of the greatest examples of non-toxic masculinity representation on tv.

Honestly I really think this show is the reason I turned out more compassionate than my parents.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Our gods are dead. Ancient Klingon warriors slew them a millennia ago. They were... more trouble than they were worth.

Maybe just one of the many reasons Klingon's often seem ridiculously awesome. When you reject ancient gods because they were "troublesome" you're choosing to build a world where the world having no meaning becomes liberating instead of suffocating.

No wonder things like this are so easy for them to understand. No religious baggage!

[-] Zink@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago

I like to think of that stance as “positive nihilism” if that makes sense. It is liberating to really feel in your bones that it’s OK to focus on one things that really matter to you rather than the things you’ve been taught should matter to you.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Was it ever made canon that the old Klingon "gods" were a spacefaring race that conquered the still plabet-bound Klingons with superior technology and were eventually overthrown? I feel like that might have been beta canon, or maybe just a very compelling fan theory.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 65 points 1 month ago

NOOO BUT SHE ISN'T TRANS SHE'S A TRILL WHICH IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT'S STILL DAX JUST FROM.....

  • Real people who don't understand symbolism.
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think the writers intended the Trill to be a an allegory for being trans. It was probably just supposed to be a cool sci fi stand in for being different. You can only show current, real life discrimination being non existent in the Federation in so many ways before you have to make up new things.

But it also doesn't change anything. Trans allegory or not, it's yet another instance showing how Star Fleet and the Federation value everybody, no matter if they're different or how they're different. Fuck the transphobes.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

There's that DS9 episode where Jadzia risks exile from Trill society to revisit an old relationship, and, if not necessarily trans, it reads pretty obviously as a queer allegory.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I still wouldn't say that one reads as a trans allegory. The conflict arises from failing to meet social expectations, not from changes in gender.

But yeah, it definitely reads as a queer allegory.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

That’s how I feel, but I don’t think it takes away from people who see the situation as similar to being trans.

And also, just in general, it’s so easy to treat trans people with respect. It’s very easy, and if you do make a mistake on their pronouns or accidentally deadname someone, I’ve never ever had them take it offensively, just apologize and we move on.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That’s how I feel, but I don’t think it takes away from people who see the situation as similar to being trans.

I was speaking more about the intention of the writers at the time they made the character. Seeing it as an allegory for being trans is still 100% valid despite it probably not being the intentions of the writers.

I edited my comment to make that more clear.

And also, just in general, it’s so easy to treat trans people with respect. It’s very easy, and if you do make a mistake on their pronouns or accidentally deadname someone, I’ve never ever had them take it offensively, just apologize and we move on.

Agreed

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

I don't even think it's symbolism from the Klingon's perspective. It's a bit different with the Trill extra personality there, but the objection is the actual point. That's still Dax in there, even though they look different now.

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago

Sisko still calls her Old Man though. Somewhat ironically, but consistently.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but less in a pronoun sense and more in a nickname. She never asked him to stop, if she did I'm guessing he would have stopped immediately

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

A term of endearment they share, not seen as an insult, and all the more silly that the Dax symbiote is now hosted by a body younger than Sisko. It works well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homura1650@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its not symbolism.

The reason people view Dax as a trans is that they were at times male and at times female. That is not symbolic of being trans, it is just being trans.

However, despite exploring what it means to be a trill passing through generations of hosts, the changing gender aspect of it never comes up. If Kurzon was a women, I doubt we would be talking about Dax as a trans stand-in, but I can't think of a single plot point or character development that would meaningfully change.

Normally I'm a believer in death of the author, so I won't be offended if anyone wants to completly ignore thus section, but in the DS9 documentary, they have a section on LGBT representation, and their big example for it was Jadzia. However, that was not for being trans, it was for being in a gay relationship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya8WTQc93yI&t=5467s

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 month ago

Because their masculinity and confidence in themselves is so impeccable that nothing that anyone any where can say or state about any other sexuality will ever effect them.

They are so comfortable and sure in who they are that nothing they ever see, no matter how different, will ever affect them.

To me, someone who accepts everyone else while maintaining their own surety on themselves is the height of masculinity.

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.” – Marcus Aurelius

Edit: extrapolated for modernity, rephrase as "good person"

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

To me, someone who accepts everyone else while maintaining their own surety on themselves is the height of masculinity.

I'm sorry, but are you saying feminine people cannot also do this? Or that it would make them masculine?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly, I’ve gained a whole new level of appreciation for Jadzia’s character in recent years, largely in light of how absurdly politicized gender identity and trans rights have become.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

I've spent too much time on computers.

I don't see people as their age, gender, color, name, whatever. To me, a person is a construct, that construct is immutable. You, as a person, exist, only your variables change. Your name, age, gender, sex, personality, political views, culture, race, skin color, etc, are all properties of the immutable object that represents you.

In this way, your name, gender, age, political views, etc, can all change, and the human object that is you, never changes.

Technology does this already. A good example is with user accounts for something like active directory (the windows domain login thing). Your user object isn't assigned by name, or login ID or whatever. You have, what is referred to as a UUID inside of the system. To that UUID, you have parameters like your name, email, phone number, etc, attached to it. When permissions are given, they're given to your UUID, not to your name.

Because of this, the administrators like me, can update your name, phone number, login, email, etc, without changing what you have access to. Your email account is tied to your UUID as well, so your user object has permission to access that mailbox, and it's listed in the parameters as your primary mailbox (for stuff like auto configure).

It's all very basic object oriented stuff.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 15 points 1 month ago

wait, you literally objectify people

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

OOP does an outstanding job of illustrating the nature of the universe, and people are part of that universe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

Wait wait wait... immutable means unchangeable! In your analogy this would mean if someone changes anything about them, like a name due to marriage or gender due to affirming care, they become a new object. And you can, but shouldn't assign that new object the same UUID.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

wait, so if someone tells you to refer to them in a different way, you can just go "ok" and move on without the smallest hitch in your life? without losing your shit and foaming at the mouth?

nah... no way.

are we sure this particular Klingon didn't start a podcast later to cry about this for months?

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 7 points 1 month ago

If not a podcast, then at least a video shot in portrait mode, alone in the cockpit of a shuttle craft because the rest of their house can't stand listening to their crap.

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's easy for us but those that hold bigotry as part of their identity will have problems.

[-] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 month ago

What you identify as does not matter, as long as you die in battle with honor!

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Do they have no joy!?

Show your joy!

Kaplah!

[-] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Wow, I saw that episode, for the first time, like an hour ago.

[-] terribletortoise@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Oh wow. You have so much more wonderful DS9 ahead of you still!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Honor to you and your house!

Kaplah!

[-] brianary@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago

Now I feel bad that perhaps her best friend kept calling her "old man".

[-] homura1650@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Don't, Jadzia clearly appreciated it.

Trill's relationships to their past hosts is complicated and never fully explored, but it is clearly established that the distance they create between their current host's life and that of their past host is something that is enforced apon them by broader trill society.

Both Kurzon and Jadzia were, at least at times, clearly unhappy at the extent to which they had to distance themselves from their past life.

https://youtu.be/Qu-bP5367Yo?si=YNBFC_IUo7o7FpCd

The thing is, Trill are not trans. Dax didn't go from being a man to a woman. Kurzon was always a man and Jadzia was always a women. And DS9 actually took this concept seriously on its own terms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
818 points (96.6% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3692 readers
812 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable, neither is supporting people who actively want to kill those groups. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS