599

A school district in northeast Florida must put back in libraries three dozen books as part of a settlement reached Thursday with students and parents who sued over what they said was an unlawful decision to limit access to dozens of titles containing LGBTQ+ content.

Under the agreement the School Board of Nassau County must restore access to three dozen titles including “And Tango Makes Three,” a children’s picture book based on a true story about two male penguins that raised a chick together at New York’s Central Park Zoo. Authors Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson were plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the district, which is about 35 miles (about 60 kilometers) northeast of Jacksonville along the Georgia border.

The suit was one of several challenges to book bans since state lawmakers last year passed, and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law, legislation making it easier to challenge educational materials that opponents consider pornographic and obscene. Last month six major publishers and several well-known authors filed a federal lawsuit in Orlando arguing that some provisions of the law violate the First Amendment rights of publishers, authors and students.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 143 points 1 month ago

Imagine seeing a true story about penguins and deciding it's gay propoganda

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 29 points 1 month ago

And also, how has the US got itself into a position where LGBTQ+ needs to be suppressed? Gay or not, why should these homophobic politicians get to decide what the children can be exposed to without involving the parents in the decision.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Because they're probably closeted themselves, and it makes them feel things.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Seriously tho I had a teacher in high school who straight up said he'd date men if it wasn't against his religion. Guess who he voted for

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because we have such a large number of people convinced that love is "obscene" and that love and sex are for procreation only and shouldn't be talked about except to congratulate people who are making babies. But mostly because the people pushing those ideas are people have never truly loved anyone other than themselves and/or want to rape without consequence.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

"Love" is fine, but it can't be gay without sex being involved, so two dads == obscene. Clearly there's no sex involved in hetero~~sexual~~ relationships in children's books, but there must be in those LGBTQ+ books. Why else would they be banned?

-Florida lawmakers, probably

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And also, how has the US got itself into a position where LGBTQ+ needs to be suppressed?

By folks voting for and supporting Republicans. This is the simple, undeniable answer.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

gay propoganda

Propogaynda

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

Propaganda.

So, 'propagaynda'.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Like Stephen Colbert said, "reality has a well-known liberal bias.":

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Man I wish I could have been there. That sounds incredible.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 42 points 1 month ago

When christians beat you with their bible, beat them back with a children's book about gay penguins!

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

The children's book will probably be more fun to read, and more educational about the actual world we live in.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

How much did this one county cost you to find out, Florida? 10 million?

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago

At least it went to lawyers and not something stupid like hungry children.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 21 points 1 month ago

Let's normalize Luxury Gay Space Libraries.

[-] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 month ago

I don't get it? A space for gays? Or Gaaaaaays in spaaaaaace!!! I need to know!!

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 1 month ago
[-] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 month ago

Both it is!! 🌈🚀📚✨

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

You can't send gay men to space, their uteruses will explode. Or something, I ran out of excuses a while ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I know you were riffing off of Pigs in Space, but the way you typed it out, and the way it played in my head has me envisioning the David Bowie and Elton John of the pig Muppets in a two man space fighter action adventure comedy series, ala Flash Gordon or Lost in Space

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

I'm just going to drop this link off right here: https://www.queerliberationlibrary.org/ 🌈

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

As a cis ally, I'm totally here for it! That's a great resource, and having those spaces in schools and public libraries are important!

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

Totally agree. QLL is not a replacement for local queer spaces and resources, just a supplement.

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Did the settlement include criteria or guidelines for other books the district is not allowed to ban going forword? Otherwise what's to stop them from banning any other books they don't like?

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Losing this one should at least give them pause.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Hahahahaha, oh you're not kidding? Umm. Have you met these dumbasses?

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Should... Is doing a lot of heavy lifting. But apparently there are parents and authors that will take their money.

[-] Sway_Chameleon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

DeSantis does love to fuck around. He never learns anything from the finding out he later recieves, but oh my he does love him some fuckery.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Americans have the freedom to read any books they want

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Not my book, I won't let you! Okay, you can read it but don't tell any of your friends.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Is it a fartography book?

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

There's too much US specific legal mumbo jumbo and administration terms in there for me, but seeing that there's a bit of resistance against this whole "ban books" thing is good.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Lmao, imagine getting your ass kicked by the gays.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not too hard to imagine. I have many gay friends and some of them are tough af.

Picture a skinny straight guy (me) hanging out at the local gay bar with friends. I'm there all the time and know all the locals and staff too, great crowd and prob my fav place to hang for a drink.

Some guy I've never seen before keeps making moves on me, I just keep moving away. Someone explains I'm straight and he says, "Excellent. I enjoy the challenge." Eventually he thinks it's "fun" to poke my bum with a pool cue while I try play. I've had enough, "Dude, fuck off! No means no!" and I get ready to fight.

Well, in storms a crowd of some of the toughest guys there and the bartender, it gets so heated and they physically drag him out. A few moments later, one of my friends comes back in and asked if I'm okay. I am, it was no big deal. But he says that's not enough. Goes back out, they drag this guy back in, force him to apologise—he's sobbing big time—then drag him back out again.

The walkway off the street is painted as a giant pride rainbow, and apparently everyone's favourite part was slamming him down on there and saying he's never welcome here.

So, yeah. Don't fuck with gay people. Not to mention some of the much older fellas have taken huge beatings back in the 70s fighting for their rights and they're tough as nails.

[-] tquid@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Holy shit that is top-notch gay brohood there. Respect to these guys giving a rogue asshole a lesson in boundaries.

I remember back in the late 90s when casual gay slurs were the norm, I said something, I forget what, that implied that I'd beat up some dude who was gay. My dad told me "Just because he's a slur doesn't make him any less of a man who is more than capable of beating the living shit out of you". That was an eye opener.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I'm sure a non-zero number of people responsible for the removal have imagined that and similar scenarios extensively

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

Gonna be hard since they burned them all.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wouldn't that mean that the publishers get to sell another round of copies to all of the public libraries, so the public pays for them again via their taxes? Sucks but it may benefit some of the writers/editors/publishers.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If I was the publisher I would be giving a free copy to any school that asked for one.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

Agreed. It’s also great publicity.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
599 points (99.2% liked)

News

23267 readers
3023 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS