230
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 29 points 10 hours ago

The Mario detection tool seems to be catching fan art in the crossfire, too.

That's the actual headline.

[-] Quazatron@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

Two can play that game. I bet it is possible to create an AI tool that generates and posts Mario pictures faster than they can take them down. Why you'd want to do that I don't know.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 9 hours ago

Why you want to waste Nintendos lawyers time?

Because it’s a noble goal. Nintendo are massive shit cunts to everyone else.

[-] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 hours ago

Spite. That's why.

[-] nfms@lemmy.ml 56 points 16 hours ago

Energy wasted to create an AI image to have more energy wasted to have an AI remove it. I'd say this is a win for AI

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 6 points 13 hours ago

AI actually stands for Artificial Incredible harm being caused to the planet

[-] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I'll stop using ai when Pearson stops using ai to generate broken homework assignments. Sometimes the only way to get whatever incorrect answer the ai autograder is looking for is to fish it out from the model.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It's more of a win for Nintendo really.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)
[-] potat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Isn't this the same broken AI that has been striking youtube videos about Minecraft clients? Why is every company suddenly using this?

Edit: Yes it is. I really don't know what to say anymore. Imagine applying youtube's broken copyright system to the entire internet, but even worse.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago

Because they can. There are no laws stopping them.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

There are provisions in the DMCA for filing false claims.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 9 hours ago

It’s easy to file a DCMA claim.

It’s harder to challenge it, let alone go after those faking it.

[-] Rob200@lemmy.zip 12 points 18 hours ago

Simple. They won't have to spend as much money. Of course them saving money won't translate to lower Nintendo Switch prices, because they'l actually be making more money by keeping prices the same.

and as long that mainstream consumers aren't boycotting Nintendo on record profits from these changes related to ai, then Nintendo and other companies will keep the prices the same, aside from raising them in the future.

[-] Shadywack@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I just want to see Nintendo go after all the Rule34 stuff. It might be the one thing that could exhaust their resources.

[-] Rooki@lemmy.world 77 points 19 hours ago

Is nintendo replacing their lawyers with ai soon too?

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 45 points 19 hours ago

Flood the net with photos and make their AI work overtime costing them lots

[-] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

Flood it with AI copies of official Mario content. Train the copyright software to associate the context of the official art to get the official art taken down.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago

Why does the title specify that the tool is taking down “AI-generated” pictures if the article focuses on how it’s taking down fan art indiscriminately?

[-] dan@upvote.au 21 points 18 hours ago

Because anything AI-related gets more clicks.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 24 points 18 hours ago

Every time I think shitendo can't get any worse, they prove me wrong. I hate that company so much. They are like a rich brat kid with a toy he is telling everyone not to touch. Fuck off already

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 9 points 17 hours ago

I thought AI generated pictures were automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 16 hours ago

You've got that the other way around. You can't copyright AI generated pictures, but pictures created by AI can still be taken down as violations of copyright law.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 16 hours ago

I don't think that's how it works. If it exactly looks like something protected by laws like copyright or whatever your country uses, I highly doubt that any court would say that it's fine just because it was created by AI.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Do you have the time and money to fite that in court against Nintendo?

[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

It was only a matter of time, especially for Nintendo.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 18 hours ago

Just let the man have a pint! He’s certainly earned it.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
230 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58227 readers
3936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS