11
I don't care at all about this. I hope people steal every last thing off the shelf of WalMart and Target.
I sort of understand that impulse, but you're just going to be left with an even more giant Amazon overlord if you don't have proper competition in brick and mortar.
Hopefully not now that the FCC sued them and wants to break up Amazon. We could turn a Walmart our target into housing for the homeless, or split it up and create shopping centers for cheap so people can open their own shops.
Hopefully not now that the FCC sued them and wants to break up Amazon.
Oh my sweet summer child...
Delusions are an interesting place to live
Then we start stealing from Amazon
Like, the warehouses that can be kept pretty secure or are you going full on Vin Diesel ripping off truckers and having your sister fall in love with some guy whose middle name is Earl?
I mean... why not both?
Tôüçhé
Who needs neighborhood supermarkets or drug stores anyway?
Wouldn't Target and Walmart disappearing just open the market for a locally owned small business, or maybe even multiple, to take their place?
Doesn't need to be a corporation that fills that niche.
I don't see how smaller businesses would fare any better in this case.
Jesus. And who do you think will come fill in the blast crater?
I think people will simply do without. Such businesses are not profitable without massive public subsidies for the workers, anyway. Good riddance.
That’s naivety speaking. People won’t do without and other companies will fill the need/want. That’s proven over and over (late stage capitalism).
What I mean to say is they will do without WalMart and Target.
And I think you missed the point.
The greatest theft which is causing thousands of stores to close is called rent-inflation, only that stuff is 100% legal because the politicians themselves often get more income from their "realestate investor" side occupation that from politics.
When the people see the rich getting away with crimes against humanity, the little crimes seem way less important.
I work at a community mental health center in a major urban area and this affords me a lot of contact with the lower-SES people in my area. While not many, I do know of some of our clientele who engage in this sort of "flash robbery"-style theft, wherein they'll go into a store with a group of people (while the store is open) and just start walking out with merchandise, not even bothering to hide it. The stores security personnel are under strict orders to not physically intervene, due to the potential for lawsuits against either the store or its security company, and so all they can do is call the police. These sorts of operations are always done in mere minutes, so the police never get there in time, and they're often not even called. The stores have policies that essentially require them to eat the loss and just try to make it up, which obviously they're failing at as these kinds of burglaries become more common.
I'm sure it's not just poor people doing this crap, but the ones in my community that are definitely are not doing it out of need. From what I've seen, these are also the type of people that everyone in their community tends to hate, the "trashy" people that make neighborhoods bad places to live. They have poor emotional control, get into arguments easily, pick unnecessary fights, etc. Also worth noting, although I'm sure this isn't representative of the overall trend: all of the people I know of in my clinic's population that do this are women.
It's a very serious problem, because it's obviously much more economical for these companies to simply close down the burgled stores and open up new ones in areas with lower crime and lower rent, which ultimately just harms the poor communities they move out of, making them poorer and less attractive to other retailers. So, a very tiny group of thieves can harm their entire community in some pretty severe and systemic ways. Sadly, i think the best solution would be for cities to increase police presence in major shopping areas, which will cost taxpayers rather than corporations, but it's ultimately for the good of the affected communities and the cities as a whole.
Who is downvoting this?
Certain items are being stolen to be resold. This isn't about someone stealing food to feed their kids or unable to afford tampons or pads. Name brand dish detergent and other stuff gets stolen and then resold as the "fell off a truck" at a discount. There are also people who steal on demand, basically personal shoppers but they don't pay for it.
I have no idea what the answer is but the comments here that say they hope everything is stolen from wmt, tgt, etc shows unfathomable ignorance as to what happens when stores close and not only do people lose their jobs, the area becomes a food desert if that was the only place to shop for those without reliable transportation.
Who is downvoting this?
I've noticed the downvotes too and I suspect there's a sizable number of lemmings here who are so anti-capitalist/anti-corporation that they think flash-thefts and smash-and-grab raids are good things, don't understand how these crimes harm the communities they take place in way more than they harm the companies being burgled, and downvote anything that pokes a hole in their tiny worldview. It's one of the shittier parts of the Lemmy community that I've been putting up with so far.
Anybody who is not a simpleton with zero life experience is aware that being an "underdog in society" doesn't mean somebody is inherently a good or bad as a person: plenty of powerless people out there when given a little power are revealed to be complete total shits.
It's perfectly compatible to be anti-capitalist/anti-corporation (well, most corporations) whilst thinking theft without need is also morally wrong. Assuming the corporations involved are exploitative and use lobbying and other forms of political corruption to gain unfairly advantage positions and these people are not stealing due to need, that would just mean that what we have here is two wrongs, and those don't make a right.
Bring back community policing
That to me seems like it would turn it to vigilantism fast, and that's exactly what maga wants though... thats why they walk around with their open carry, intimidate people they don't THINK belong and feel like a slippery slope...
I don't think that's what they are talking about. Police forces used to have walking beats and the officers on those beats knew the entire neighborhood. The presence of authority tends to slow down some forms of crime.
Yeah the people who are responding to this saying "who cares, it's just corporations being harmed" are thinking too small picture. The corporations aren't going even harmed that much by this, not on a global scale, they'll just shut down the most affected stores. Then who suffers? All the residents of those communities.
Look, I don't like big mega corps like Target and Walmart, but the fact is that they can afford to sell goods to people at way lower prices than small retailers. Don't misunderstand me, I know that's because they've put a stranglehold around suppliers and built giant monopolies, but the effect is the same. The world would be a much better place if giant retail monopolies all disappeared, but it would have terrible consequences for them to only dissappear from the poorest and most crime laden communities
Uhm .. it's called dystopia.. read up on it. 😋
Isn't this how the book Ready Player One worked? Everything outside a metroplex was a lawless wasteland.
That's not what a dystopia is. It sounds like you need to read up on it a bit more.
At least two things are at play here.
-
Personal shoppers but they steal instead of paying for it
-
Items like tide detergent getting stolen and resold.
I actually assumed the Target in downtown Seattle was one of the ones closing. I was unaware there even was one in the U-District. I could easily see a lot of theft there.
I'm a little surprised about the one in Ballard. While that spot is not exactly the epitome of high class, it is far from dangerous and does not have a large amount of homeless anymore. This kind of makes me think that revenue is shit and they are just using theft and safety as an excuse. If it was really about that, the one downtown would be closing instead.
ORC wrangling is sort of fun. They think they get away with it but then get involved in a police blitz and go to jail for quite a while. What happens is They police and store asset protection / loss prevention allow them to steal products until they hit the federal $ limit to be a federal crime. A blitz occurs and they get funneled to police waiting outside to arrest them. I’ve probably seen 5 ORC rings busted using this method.
Retail theft isn't really increasing or that high. This is the excuse companies give to close stores in underserved (poor) areas do they can focus on opening stores where they can make more money.
They get videos of a flashy theft and then blast them across the Internet & TV.
It's especially telling since in the OP article they even say they're not going to give data to actually back up their claims.
From your source:
It’s not necessarily the amount of theft taking place that most concerns the industry, but rather the increased violence associated with it.
Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported more violence associated with organized retail crime than a year ago. In the last survey, 81% reported an increase in violence.
Meanwhile, 45% of retailers in the survey said they have reduced specific store hours to deal with crime and violence, nearly 30% said they somehow changed store product selection, and 28% reported closing a specific location because of crime.
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
11 points (58.7% liked)
News
23259 readers
2740 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS