this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
1066 points (97.3% liked)

Memes

50240 readers
1615 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Robsadaisy@lemmy.world 233 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is high art and belongs in a museum. I'm not joking.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I unironically agree. 2nd place looks more like a dog, but 1st place feels more like a dog.

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Starshader@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago

Can confirm, she were high while drawing that dog.

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

Reminder a random pair of glasses on the floor of a modern art museum made a bunch of dumbasses think it was an exhibit.

Modern art is just money laundering, no shade at the artists ya do what ya gotta do.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exceedingly accurate depiction, first place was warranted

The fact that 1st place could cite a credible source is what really does it for me.

[–] HerrKai@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Is this the actual ACTUAL picture or some sort of AI recreation based on the drawing?

[–] Rexios@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

AI image generation wasn’t a thing when this happened 10 years ago

[–] HerrKai@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For all I knew this could have been a very recent post or even if this was 10 years ago someone could've created that image on the left very recently

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

The image on the left was posted with the drawing 10ish years ago.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

The actual picture was something like that.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No it was a person that recreated their children's images in Photoshop.

At least that's how I remember it.

[–] moipe@lemmy.world 89 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] klemptor@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah greyhounds be awkward like that

[–] clubb@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well, the second place is more crafty, but where's the fun in that? There would be huge amounts of similar nice pictures in the competition. The first place makes me laugh and uses a way to look at the dog shape that I haven't seen before. I prefer this added value to perfect technique.

[–] OrangeXarot@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

my father that teaches drawing in a comics school always says "drawing iperrealistic is easy, having your artstyle is very difficult and most of the time people don't have one"

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 years ago
[–] SquareBear@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago

Title was doggy mcdogface

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago

Artstyle vs art quality

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What are yoir favorite noises to make while ln discord calls?

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gmQI_N9ifE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly, I think it shows how throughly democracy fails to deliver what reality is and how feelings dictate the choices people make.

[–] Perditija@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

I think it's completely valid to vote according to your feelings. That's how you determine what you find important in those you vote for. Drawings are a form of art and the purpose of art is to invoke specific feelings in the consumer - apparently more people enjoyed the first drawing and voted for it, which is completely valid for a competition for "drawings"; it wasn't a competition for drawing skills, just the pictures themselves.

What I find much more problematic for democracy is misinformation, especially if deliberate by news outlets, politicians or lobbyists. They know how to manipulate feelings to get what they want.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

🤔 What system should we make, then? No system we've ever made so far has worked. There's always endless suffering no matter what we do or how hard we try politically.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Deserved winner

[–] snowraven@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Tough competition

[–] altec@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

Absolute classic

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Didn't a little kid draw the first one and that's why it won?

[–] jedi_hamster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At least this once, it objectively has not.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

yeah ok you're all so quirky because you like the shitty drawing or whatever.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

And we called it Doggy McDogface.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

i know, people are just supporting the second place one to be 'quirky' cause it's the underdog

[–] 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

No one knows what it means, but it's provocative! Also art is complicated.

[–] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Pure democracy = rule of the stupid because there's more of them.