957
submitted 15 hours ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago

tax them until they learn to mind their own business

[-] kelargo@lemmy.world 75 points 7 hours ago
[-] LordGimp@lemm.ee 50 points 6 hours ago

Anyone with over 10 million dollars in wealth should be legally classified as a dragon and anyone stealing from their hoard shall not be punishable under the law.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 38 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not so fun fact: The absolute richest dragons in all of fantasy, excluding Smaug, only have a net worth of several hundred million dollars. A Red Elder Wyrm will have, on average, around 2.5-3 million gold pieces of wealth, with an absolute maximum of 5 million gold pieces. That means that the absolute greediest, and richest type of dragon, by far, only has between 100,000 to 500,000 oz worth of gold.

Smaug being the absolute outlier because he had somewhere between 5 to 10 billion dollars worth of gold.

Now if you are wondering why I'm making a big deal about this, it is because 500,000 oz of gold is only worth about 1.1 billion US dollars. But that is the absolute outlier of the greediest type of dragon that there is. Still only looking at Chaotic Evil Red Elder Wyrms, the average would only be about 3.5 million gold pieces, or a mere 350,000 oz of gold. That's only about $850,000,000 and that is just the most average of the absolute greediest manefestations of greed that our limited minds could imagine. Most dragons would be absolutely fine with between $1,000,000 to $10,000,000. The literal manefestations of greed don't need more than $10,000,000 according to every treasure table.

Those people that have more than 100 million dollars have already passed the greed alignment chart into Chaotic Evil. They are damn near caricatures of dragons at this point.

[-] LordGimp@lemm.ee 20 points 6 hours ago

My favorite is always the Egyptian god deciding to save the equivalent of $10,000 usd every day and never spend a single penny of it back in 10,000 BC and they still don't have as much money as Jeff Bozos.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I believe that the normal person can imagine themselves as a dragonslayer far more easily than a godslayer. A dragonslayer just needs a sword, shield, set of armor, and an unbreakable will. A godslayer needs to be able to turn the entirety of their target, including the things that don't exist on any Universe Plane, or Prime Material Plane, into a black hole.

These modern "unassailable" individuals that constitute global fifedoms in and of themselves are merely dragons. They absolutely can be defeated. They aren't the invincible gods that they attempt to claim to be.

Edit: umm, what Egyptian god? They had a lot of them.

[-] LordGimp@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

Sounds like a Set thing to do. Real prideful and blows up in his face.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Fair enough, I could see Ra or Anubis doing the same, based on your description of "real prideful and having the whole thing blow up in his face." Certainly sounds like most of the exploits of all three of them.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago

Free press in the USA? LOL, it becomes more and more difficult every time a US oligarch buys a news outlet.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Majority Report, Some More News. I suppose the on the other side of the aisle it would be Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro.

There is still some of the fourth estate left that hasn't been bought by oligarchs, it's just not exactly effective on the leftward side of the overton window.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Breaking Points is up and coming. But all these shows still rely on Youtube which can pull the plug at any moment.

[-] gerbler@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Isn't the Daily Wire funded by oil barons? I wouldn't put them in the same category as MR which is entirely funded by their viewers and a handful of sponsors.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 100 points 11 hours ago

Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, in his own tweet on the news wrote, “The first step towards fascism is when the free press cowers in fear.”

I don't know if this is the free press cowering, or the free press being bought out by rich people. Either way, it's some bullshit.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago

Private ownership of a news outlet breaks every definition of "free" in "free press".

A "free press" no longer exists.

[-] Microw@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago

Eh.. no? Most free press is privately owned. Just not by billionaires who influence the content.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 5 hours ago

When Bozos bought it, this was the exact concern, because there is no ethical billionaire. I'm pretty sure he promised to not interfere with the reporting or content. Turned out to be another lying, selfish asshole with more money than he can ever spend... Who could have predicted that (besides everyone)?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 76 points 11 hours ago

“The most consequential election in our country, a choice between Fascism and Democracy, and you sit out? Cowards. Unethical, fearful cowards,” wrote one reader.

Haha, yep.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 76 points 11 hours ago

Oh man the first 3 words got me excited.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 328 points 15 hours ago

Wow, a hugely wealthy oligarchical capitalist facilitating the rise of fascism?

How completely unpredictable, with no historical precedent whatsoever!

Who could have possibly expected this?!

[-] NRay7882@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Some real bald-headed behavior right here.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago

The motto of the Post is literally “Democracy dies in Darkness”, and it was adopted immediately after Trump was elected. It is deliberately positioned as pro-Democrat and anti Trump. I didn’t have a high esteem of Bezos, but I am still disappointed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Where are the conspiracy theorists when there is actually something going on? I guess they stand back and stand by...

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

NGL, I had to reread the headline because my brain got too excited.

this sounds better

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

Not for nothing but what would even happen if someone like Bezos got caught red-handed killing someone on twitch.

I don't think very much. Free shipping to come in before 10am is just too good to pass up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Oh Jeffrey.... that's not how you're aupposed to run a newspaper.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 64 points 13 hours ago

Sigh.

Canceled my subscription.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Just spoke to my parents. Uninterrupted subscribers since '73.

I called them right after canceling my own subscription and they'd already canceled theirs.

I hope Bezos is happy losing 51-year patrons of his paper.

[-] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago

Look, that's honestly quite sad and very telling of the way things are, but I audibly snorted at the idea of Jeff Bezos noticing his income slightly lower this week, panicking, scrambling to find The Borbendorfs' payment. A single tear wells up, but he wipes it away frantically. Never let them see. Never let them know how it hurts.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Yes, and that's exactly the point, isn't it?

There are some areas of business that are still built on trust and personal relationships and people trying to right by each other so they can each support their families.

But that's not the case in modern politics or tech. It doesn't matter if you have a relationship dating back decades. It's inconsequential to a billionaire who's earning a margin on an all the goods - and increasing share of which are brazenly counterfeit - that he sells globally.

Bezos doesn't care about you, or me, or my aged parents. It's not only that he doesn't care about us, but instead that the billionaire class in general doesn't care about anything besides contingencies to maximize profits and mitigate losses, real-world consequences be damned.

He will never notice any of us. It will not meaningfully affect his paycheck. It is up to each of us, including you, to determine whether to construct meaning in a symbolic act of protest, if an effectual act of protest is no longer an option.

[-] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

I know. I know. I'm already a converted vegetarian or "bad at it vegan". I'm spending a fortune on an EV car payment. My electricity is from a wind farm. I'm off all the socials. I've been recycling properly for decades and they tell me it was pointless. I'm getting pretty tired of personal responsibility. Can we do the guillotines now? I can't make the first move. I've got kids and a mortgage. Start rounding them up and I can do some small part there too.

[-] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 180 points 15 hours ago

Has this f*ing idiot never heard of the Streisand Effect? The fact that they broke a decades long tradition to do this makes a louder thump than their endorsement would have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 50 points 13 hours ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 150 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The Washington Post: "Democracy Dies in Darkness"

Bozos:

Turn the Light off, turn the light off.

I had to settle for the Jurassic Park GIF because I couldn't find the one of Homer Simpson using his gun to turn off the lights. If anyone has that GIF, please hook me up.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 79 points 14 hours ago

Also, cancel your prime subscriptions you cowards!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
957 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
4052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS