972
Here we are (slrpnk.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 4 hours ago

It's a government by rich owners for rich owners and it's working as designed

[-] Letsdothis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

And none of you poors can do anything about it.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I mean, that's most governments

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 45 points 8 hours ago

We pay more in taxes than the welfare states, have less representation... Seems like there was something in US History about taxation without representation.

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Secede. That'll teach 'em.

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Honestly of all the states, California probably has the best chance at seceding successfully.

[-] Saryn@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if California's GDP has surpassed that of the UK, which would make it the fifth largest economy in the world if it were to secede.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 18 points 9 hours ago
[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago

In Germany we have two votes, one for a local representative and one for a party. In itself it's a pretty decent system

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yet, the local representatives in the pairlaments (Bundestag, Landtag) represent districts of approximately the same population number. Thus, in our first chamber, no vote has more value than another.

But in the Bundesrat, which comes closest to the US senate, states with higher population number do have more representatives than small states, which weakens the inequality of votes, yet still one vote from Bremen (population 700k, 3 representatives) has 13 times as much value as one from NRW (p. 18 mio, 6 rep.).

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm not really happy with our democracy. It always feels like our say stops at the ballot box, we need more direct democracy.

[-] laranis@lemmy.zip 1 points 59 minutes ago

Eight years ago I would have agreed. But, I think we've demonstrated the short comings of putting authority for our most important policies in the hands of your average citizen.

I don't have a better answer, mind you. Hopefully someone way further right on the "average citizen" bell curve has better ideas.

[-] turmoil@feddit.org 7 points 7 hours ago

The German system is what the US would have been if they would have regularly updated their constitution.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It was largely modelled after the US, with bugfixes applied. It definitely has issues but isn't remotely as fucked as a partisan 2-party system.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 38 points 12 hours ago

This is an example of why the House of Representatives also exists.

[-] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 41 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Except CA isn't fairly represented in the House either. CA would need 68 representatives just to have the same representation as Wyoming.

And say, shouldn't the states that have a huge economy and bring in more tax dollars have more of a say than the red welfare states that suck up those tax dollars? Just sayin...

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

CA would need 68 representatives just to have the same representation as Wyoming.

Every state is guaranteed one representative, and then otherwise by population. Wyoming has one representative.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 33 minutes ago

Thanks for explaining how the system was rigged.

And say, shouldn’t the states that have a huge economy and bring in more tax dollars have more of a say than the red welfare states that suck up those tax dollars?

By that logic, a rich person should have more say in government?

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

No, they don't generate the tax dollars

[-] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

States are not people and should not be given any extra power simply for being a state.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 30 points 10 hours ago

I disagree with the economy part. Fuck that. Your value isn't described by how much wealth you generate.

Republicans are (or were) hypocritical with their talk of fiscal responsibility while representing states that take in more money than they give back. This should be pointed out if they ever return to that argument. This isn't to say poor people from republican states (or anywhere else) are less valuable though. It's only hypocrisy that's wrong, not trying to help lower income people that's wrong.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 16 points 10 hours ago

shouldn't the states that have a huge economy and bring in more tax dollars have more of a say

Wtf, dude? Can you make something even more american-sounding?

[-] Zorg 18 points 11 hours ago

The house were any given rep represents between 550k and close to a million constituents?

[-] expr@programming.dev 11 points 10 hours ago

There's no need for a bicameral system. It was a system designed to capitulate to wealthy interests and nothing more.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

It is as it needed to be to get the states to sign on. But times have changed, and it needs to as well

[-] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 51 points 15 hours ago

Don't forget, those senators translate to electoral college votes.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 38 points 13 hours ago

Them plus the house reps, which are artificially capped at a low number, again benefitting the low population states

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 209 points 18 hours ago

Don't worry the House balances it*

*Until they froze the House because they couldn't fit anymore chairs...

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 47 points 16 hours ago

This is where the issue is. The Senate works as intended, it is meant to give the States equal power so a State like California can't just dictate what Delaware does. The House is supposed to represent based on population. The arbitrarily low cap has turned it into a second pseudo-Senate.

The House should have something like 1600 members to properly represent States. Every House seat should represent roughly the same amount of people, but that's not how it works now because of the limit. Two Representatives from different states can represent massively different sized populations.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 10 hours ago

You're correct that the senate was designed not to represent people and give the number of states more power. To say that isn't an issue though is pretty fucked up. It was literally done this way to get slave states to sign on, giving them power to protect the institution of slavery.

States are made up. People are not. Only one of these should have power in a democracy. States can have their own laws that effect themselves, but federal policy should be dictated by the will of the people, not the will of arbitrarily drawn borders.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 12 hours ago

Representative democracy is unstable and corruptible by design and it can't be anything else.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 75 points 17 hours ago

They came up with the best thing they could agree on at the time. They did not intend on it to become sacred, untouchable, and without the ability to change with the times, and sometimes we have changed it. Just not quite enough times.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 28 minutes ago

They came up with the best thing they could

Bad people with bad motives create bad systems of control.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
972 points (96.9% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
2994 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS