375
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 10 points 13 minutes ago

I fucking HATE these clickbait headlines. Read the dang article and look at the quotes:

"I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it— to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities," he said during the broadcast. (emphasis added)

RFK is a total whackjob, but it's pretty clear he's talking about some kind of voluntary "farm therapy" (which probably isn't demonstrably effective anyway) and not a concentration camp.

PLEASE we got enough bombastic language and clickbait over the Biden years. There are PLENTY of things wrong with the actual quote above without taking us into clickbait territory.

Let's criticize him on the grounds of being scientific but proposing very un-scientific actions. Let's criticize him for proposing ineffective solutions, but please, focus on his ACTUAL statement instead of trying to fluff it into some goddamn headline.

[-] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

That's great Trump won't last a day in the labor camp.

[-] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 hour ago

what the hell. staying in Canada.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 40 points 2 hours ago

So they're just already saying the "camps" part out loud, eh? I guess when you have Hitler's playbook, you can move faster than Hitler did.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

When it comes to the brainworm guy - if he really plans on banning vaccines - is he trying to kill off all the old people? Is he trying to kill off all the children?

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

Fuck that.

I strongly dislike how the argument hinges on the very movable goalpost of "illegal" drugs. It has this awful moralizing "protect the kids while we destroy privacy", vibe to it.

At first I though this would require an end-run on HIPAA, but all they really need to do is re-schedule a bunch of therapeutic drugs. Or ignore the FDA entirely and just enforce a ban by edict (somehow) through a different agency. I don't think we've ever seen federal agencies openly disagree like that before, but I think it's possible. Also: big pharma may have something to say about all this.

Like a lot of the nonsense coming from this cabinet, it'll test the crap out of state's rights.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I am not fan of RFK or any of this incoming administration, but I have to admit....those are going to be the most productive camps in the entire world! 🤣

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

What the actual fuck.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago

This is part of some rural grift facilities which probably started with "trouble teens". In recent years I've seen reports of these "farms" for "distressed" women. It's usually a place with Ranch in the name. Example: https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/11/18/the-christian-maternity-ranch-in-texas-is-a-disaster-in-the-making/

Permaculture farms, for example, are already well known for relying on abusive work conditions. See Joel Salatin:

https://medium.com/permaculture-3-0/fall-of-a-hero-f9ac80a08c0c

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2020/11/joel-salatin-chris-newman-farming-rotational-grazing-agriculture/

[-] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

Are these the same people that abduct teens at night and bring them to these camps where they die of dehydration?

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

If he comes for my antidepressants he can haul me off but he can't make me cooperate.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 37 points 4 hours ago

Is he not aware that the fascist pumpkin he will be working for pops those like breath mints?? Please do send that rapist con man to a labor camp.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

The death cultists: It only counts if you have a prescription.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 30 points 3 hours ago

Yes I am sure not being hypocrites is high on their list of concerns

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, I already started weaning myself off my depression meds. Went cold turkey once, and that was a nightmare. They're planning to kill the VA, so fuck our service. I'm never getting cut off again. I'll switch to natural alternatives, thank you.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 9 points 3 hours ago

Probably still easy to get from Mexico. Your mental health is important and shits about to get a whole lot more depressing

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Dexedrine for the win!

[-] BenReilly97@lemmy.world 96 points 10 hours ago

And a tax on cannabis sales would fund these farms, he proposed.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but... is he really suggesting a federal tax on a federally illegal substance?

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 59 minutes ago

Well, yeah? Tax stamps have pretty much always been required, and yes, on illegal weed.

https://norml.org/laws/tax-stamps/

https://taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/why-do-states-tax-illegal-drugs

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 64 points 9 hours ago

You hope he is just being clever and indirectly talking about legalizing cannabis, but you know that in reality he is just so incompetent that he has no idea what he is talking about.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

If it makes money, yes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jerakor@startrek.website 260 points 12 hours ago

Some sort of camp to help ADHD folks work on their concentration?

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I imagine a terrible, awful future Forest Gump remake.

“They had these camps that helped folks with their concentration or something like that. They said I was a shine-ning example, so I got to meet the president of the United States, again.”

“They tell me this guy is the best example. Got treated, got rich in shrimp. What a guy! Our camps are great, the best camps in all the world.”

Camera pans to Trump shaking hands with Kim Jong Un.

“In Korea, everybody got these pic-tures of their leader on the wall. We got those in Alabama too.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 23 points 8 hours ago

Phew, glad my psychiatrist prescribed me Ritalin.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Definitely safe

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
375 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS