904

Summary

Donald Trump has exempted himself from key ethics guidelines required under the Presidential Transition Act, which he signed into law in 2020.

By rejecting federal funding for his transition team, Trump avoids donor limits and disclosure requirements, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

This move marks a break from precedent and has sparked alarm over potential personal enrichment during his presidency.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whithom@discuss.online 309 points 2 weeks ago

lol. Watchdogs. Hilarious. Let me know when we have a government again.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 86 points 2 weeks ago
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 weeks ago

it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

donvict part 1 will take a generation, at least.

donvict part 2 will take a lot longer and require practically-impossible coordination and commitment to get non-republicants to the levels of representation needed for amendment ratifications and impeachments.

The "United" States of America is over.

We're gonna end up with the "Blue States of America" and the "Republic of Jesusland"

[-] Alenalda@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago

you see that's the thing, its not exactly blue stats. its blue city's, islands surrounded by hundreds of miles of red oceans

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 30 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago

Rural/urban divide is not unique to the US in any way whatsoever. Also, expect polarization to self perpetuate as blue voters move to blue states and red states to move to red states.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 138 points 2 weeks ago

And what are they going to do about it? If breaking the oath bears no teeth, the oath is pointless.

I face more punishment breaking my Paladin oath in Baldurs Gate 3...

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Just like all checks and balances in government, it assumes the branches are somewhat independent and ethical, at least claim to serve their constituents, and protect their own power. It’s up to the legislative branch or the judicial branch

One Final Check

State Vs Federal.

Grab your popcorns, because you wont be able to afford it in the future!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 117 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’d be happy that Trump voters finally got what they deserve, but unfortunately, the rest of us have to suffer the consequences alongside them. As well as the rest of the world.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't know why, but most of the world voting their political parties into power is trending to the conservative right not towards the progressive left.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because things are getting more worrying on a global scale (economical slow down, ecological crisis and wars) and the usual human reflexes are conservatism and blaming the people who are different. I think progressive ideas rather spread in times of peace and prosperity, or after catastrophic events like WW2.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

the usual human reflexes are conservatism

Like voting in to power the people causing the economic and environmental issues. It's absolutely mind-boggling how easy humans can be convinced to vote against their own interests.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 91 points 2 weeks ago

It's funny how Brazil (a country that's seen the consequences of authoritarianism) is handling their own attempted coup vs the U.S., we are basically welcoming Trump back after everything he's done.

After the coup attempt he should have been barred from office and arrested. This is such a ridiculous timeline.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Societies get the leaders they deserve.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 91 points 2 weeks ago

Him not signing an ethics pledge is probably the most honest move he did in his lifetime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 84 points 2 weeks ago

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

Fucking could? It's kinda been proven that he is corrupt and this is the best the watchdogs can do? Where's their teeth?

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

Not even kinda proven! It's 100 fucking percent proven he's corrupt. The man was found guilty of 34 felonies. He's been doing this shit literally for decades... Fucking pussies...

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 73 points 2 weeks ago

Alarm! Concern! Criticism! Hand-wringing!

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Furrowed brows!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago

Those alarms already had the copper wire stolen from behind them.

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 55 points 2 weeks ago

Opens the door to corruption?

The door was burnt for firewood years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 weeks ago

We have learned (and are still learning) that precedent doesn't mean shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

The more I see this unfold the more I understand why Trump won. (This is in no way me supporting Trump, the guy deserves the worst this world has to offer!)

Anyways, the establishment and dems are a bunch of toothless liars! If I was some poor chap doing my best to just stay alive in the US I likely also would've have lost hope in my vote mattering. Legally speaking, it quite literally doesn't. The dems regularly shitting on the primaries is a great example of this (and ofc the electoral collage).

Nobody in politics cares about the people. After the 2008 crash, both the reps and dems bailed out all the banks responsible for the mass fraud, while the people that suffered barely got shit.

The vast majority of people didn't vote and some voted Trump out of desperation, wanting any change at all. It's fucking sad.

[-] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

Trump is America's self-inflicted gunshot wound

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] andxz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Warren is a good example of someone who does care and I can only recommend her books on the matter. She came from the same place as everyone else and managed to get where she has been for a good while now.

If she'd been president 2016 or any time after that things would've looked a lot different, probably globally, I can almost guarantee as much.

Edit: and by different I mean a lot fucking better, to be clear.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

The one thing we can absolutely be sure of is that this dispicable con-man will do all that he can to enrich himself, without regard for any limiting principle or structural restraint.

Its not a question of "if" he "may" be corrupt, but only how brazen the supposed patriots in the Republican party will let him be as he does it.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

I mean the universe spent years letting us all know this guy was corrupt as fuck.

Americans voted for corruption.

We WANT corruption.

We'll be no better than Russia by the end of our lives. And it will have been no one else's fault but our own.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

"which he signed into law in 2020." You've got to be fucking kidding

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe just maybe you guys should have laws that require this instead of ohbits always been done this way. What a riduclulse country.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

Could open the door? The door was ripped from its hinges already.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 31 points 2 weeks ago

This is the problem with trying to follow decorum against a fascist.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

could open the door to corruption.

“could”

ROFL!

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

"Open the door to corruption"? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

“Americans expect and deserve a president who prioritizes the nation’s well-being over personal gain,” she added.

Yeah!

“They will not tolerate a president who abuses the powers of his office to line his own pockets.”

Weeeellllllll....

load more comments (1 replies)

I’m not surprised, but I am exasperated.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago

The most blatant act of "rules for thee, but not for me." My brother in Christ, you wrote the act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago

Don't let any of them have access to briefings or classified materials. Period. Not cleared, you have no access. You fuckers will do whatever you want after in office, but right now the current administration should not fuck around. Fuck these assholes. Let them catch up later. Its not like it will cause any more damage to our country if they don't have access before then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I appreciate the rare honesty, I guess. Not like it would change anything if he did it.

[-] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

How is this allowed under an act of congress? Oh right, lack of accountability and oversight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

In how many ways do we need to signal to Trump that he can do whatever he wants, without repercussion?

We're so fucking useless.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So he chose not to lie this once. Doesn't excuse a lifetime of it

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Raise alarms? Could open the door to corruption? Undermine accountability?

Where the Hell have these people been? And anybody who is shocked by these headlines needs to come out from under their rock. None of this is new or news. It’s SOP.

As for accountability and watchdogs? Can you be any more lip service? What is anybody going to do? Ever? They had four years to make Trump and team accountable. Hasn’t exactly worked out.

Wake me when September (2028) ends.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago

Now he did it. IT'S DONE. WE GOT EM. Donald will finally feel the FULL FORCE of our justice system telling him that they are VERY CONCERNED.

Mark your calendars everyone, we have a new holiday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

And Joe pardoned Hunter for whatever they "find" next on that laptop, so, y'know, both sides.

/s

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

I think we here all know why Biden had to pardon his son: because Trump and the republican cabal would sooner crucify him to fire up the rubes, than address any needful issues this country has. As far as conservatives are concerned, Biden’s son IS Biden, and they would deal out “pay back” for Trump’s felony convictions. It’s conservative tribalism.

But as far as conservatives will figure, it’s just “both sides” at best and “corrupt joe” at worst.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
904 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS