88
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] immutable@lemm.ee 133 points 1 week ago

A billion dollars is a hard sum of money to wrap your head around. There is basically no ethical way to make a billion dollars. If you have a billion dollars it’s because you’ve stiffed a lot of people a lot of the value they created and kept it for yourself.

[-] MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 1 week ago

This is exactly how I have always thought about it too. Pure greed. My father ran a company for 35 years and for 3 of those years he took either no payout or a very small payout so that he didn't have to let anyone go. I asked him why he didn't just downsize and he said that other people needed the money more than us. That's how shit needs to be run. People centric not profit driven.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

Even if they earned it ethically, they literally can't spend this much money. They can't spend the money fast enough.

They hold on to this much money to keep score.

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 105 points 1 week ago

Forbes did the math once and determined that Smaug, a dragon embodied by greed and selfishness, is worth $62 billion. There are 17 people richer than him.

Smaug was shot in the heart and it was a morally good act.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

I'd be willing to bet that Smaug caused less death and destruction than many (if not most) billionaires

[-] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Fyi that math was heavily contested, i agree with the sentiment but a literal mountain full of gold, assuming the market wouldnt crash, would make him the richest person on the planet.

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

We don't actually know the size of the hoard, though. We know it's big enough for him to sleep in it, and we know the Arkenstone was worth one share of it, but we don't have specific numbers (at least, none I can see). Any valuation has to be an estimation, and any estimation will be contested.

Also, the value of gold today is 75 times that of what it was in the 1930s, which makes it even harder to put a price on Smaug's hoard.

Regardless of the specific number, there is a certain level of wealth and greed that makes it morally good to shoot someone through the heart. Smaug is not the only one to have hit that threshold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 week ago

We should probably deal with them sooner rather than later

[-] intresteph@discuss.online 49 points 1 week ago

Tax them. Kill them. Whatever order

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Asking this on lemmy is like asking a pack of wolves if they enjoy the taste of lamb. You already know the answer you’re going to get…

[-] Today@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Is ok to ask for an AMEN now and then.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Billionaires shouldn't exist; no one needs that much money. They should be taxed until there are no more billionaires.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

I'm hungry.

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

I think they're bad for the economy. Money has to circulate. Every time a billionaire throws another million on the pile, they make things worse for everyone else.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is a view we don't see often enough. Everybody is into hating billionaires the way teenage girls hate the super-hot cheerleader. All they do is complain that it's not "fair" for somebody to be so rich. There's not enough discussion of the purely mechanical reasons extreme wealth is bad for the economy, not to mention the corruption opportunities it creates. The ultra-rich don't spend their money, they just exchange it to trade big blocks of asset ownership back and forth. None of that money ever gets spent on a loaf of bread or a bus ticket, or a GI Joe with the kung fu grip. It essentially disappears from the economy. I don't think most people even comprehend how that works - it involves more thought than reacting to memes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 week ago

It's why we invented the gulliotine

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago

Billionaires are a crime against humanity.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago

If you invest in the sp500, you'll have something around 8% return per year. This is highly variable year by year, of course, but in the long run, that's what you can expect to average out. You can do better than the sp500, but generally not without accepting higher risk.

With those returns, you will double your money every 9 years. Roughly. It's going to vary by decade. 2000-2010 was flat, while 2010-2020 was unusually good.

If you max out a 401k, HSA, and IRA on this strategy from a young age, you should have millions for retirement. If you're a millennial or younger, you're going to need a million or two (at least) to have a reasonable retirement.

How do you turn that into a billion? Doubling every 9 years won't do it in your lifetime. Not unless you started life as a millionaire and never withdrew a dime until you were 90. Starting with $1000 and doubling every year for 20 years, consistently, would do it.

How do you double your money consistently for 20 years? Either extreme luck or doing something extremely shady. Probably both.

In other words, they are not the genius captains of industry that right-libertarians want you to believe. They got lucky or are deeply unethical or both, and they do not deserve your respect. Most likely, they deserve your disdain. Every one of them.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago

It's not so much the money, the wealth in itself, that bothers me about them, it's the mind boggling absolutely insane amount of power having that much wealth is capable of.

They literally buy elections, they buy media outlets, by their actions they buy the direction entire countries take. They use their money to fund the actions of others that work on their behalf. They can create a literal army of individuals to work for them towards whatever end they wish to achieve. That's entirely way too much power for an individual or a family to have. Just imagine living next to someone who has a 500,000 strong army of militants just hanging out. Maybe theyre good, maybe they want to turn your neighborhood into a warzone for kicks, either way you would have no means to stop them.

Just look at smoething like the "tea party" movement in the US. Grassroots? No, try Koch brothers funded with the intent to install Koch approved representatives into the government.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

In the words of the next post on my feed: Boil ‘em, mash ‘em, stick ‘em in a stew

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Look at this visualization of how much money Jeff Bezos has, and then tell me that it is reasonable and justifiable.

https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

[-] ZoDoneRightNow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

They would serve a greater use to humanity as compost

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  1. I think wealth should be capped at a few million or tens of millions. Too much wealth hoarding keeps money out of circulation at the consumer spending level, which is bad for the economy in general, especially lower income people.
  2. Without knowing anything about a person and how they became a billionaire, I have no opinion on them individually. Jumping to conclusions about someone based on the group they belong to (like say, a black guy walking down the street) is bigoted thinking, no matter who the target is.
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Asking this question on lemmy is like going to a Linux comm and asking if it's a good idea to switch from windows to Linux. You're preaching (asking?) to the choir.

That said, eat the fucking rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

Billionaires shouldn't exist.
There should be a hard upper limit on wealth somewhere around the $100 million mark.
An amount where you can still invest your money risk-free at ~1% above inflation and live a life of plenty without lifting a finger, forever.
Any property, company, or thing in general worth more than $100 million should never be owned by one person alone.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago
[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago

Billionaires as individuals are just humans with all the good and the bad coming from that fact. Acting against them as individuals is pointless. We need to establish a system where becoming a billionaire is impossible in the first place.

At least in most democratic countries you can't just bribe the politicians legally. That helps a lot.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It billionaires exist then there is a problem in the system. Billionaires are a bug, not a feature.

[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Wealth tax that goes directly to funding a billionaire audit program. It should create a self-perpetuating cycle that means IRS audits for all of them every year.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Yes this could fix it. But we're here because of the exact same reason that if that law was magically on the books, it'd be rewritten or repealed almost instantly.

[-] Apollo42@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ideally they'd be taxed into no longer being billionaires.

Realistically we probably need to violently remind them who holds the actual power before this becomes a reality.

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

I don't eat meat, so I'm not that into eating them. I'd advocate for composting instead

[-] BaroqueInMind@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

Tax, kill, eat. In that order.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They need sanctions proportional to their wealth. And checks and balances. The less they can play the system, the better.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

They are subsidized by our government. Truly. The broken system created Elon Musk and now the broken system allowed him to buy a presidency for $134 million. Cheap, for him.

How? That is how much the system has devalued American labor since 1981.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Psychopaths

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Hoarding that wealth does nothing to improve society.

Cap real wealth at 200 million EUR, any more wealth accumulated needs to be shunted to a global poverty fund.

However, the wealth earned should still be recorded as having been earned by the person, this will give the person the recognizion they crave, a highscore list to give them incentive to keep going.

This is obviously impossible to do as wealth is not a tangible concept these days.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] iii@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Used to think: wow they've got a lot of money. Untill I grew up and realised it's not money they've got, it's estimated net worth. It's hard to turn that into cash.

If they got there by making a company that other people now value a lot: impressive.

If it's a royal family member/inheritance/..., less impressive.

Overall: don't think about it often.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Untill I grew up and realised it’s not money they’ve got, it’s estimated net worth. It’s hard to turn that into cash.

I used to think that, too. But just because its not cash doesn't mean it doesn't still translate to wealth or power. They essentially park their money in investments, liquidate when they need to, but otherwise use their assets to extract further wealth exert further influence.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

they're by definition a cancer in society

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

If a monkey hoarded more bananas then it could ever eat in its life, to the detriment of other monkeys around it, those other monkeys would kill it, and if they didn't, scientists would, to see what was wrong in its brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck em. Instantaneous lead poisoning.

[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

We need way less of them or way more of them. The wealth gap needs to be closed and I don't care which direction.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I don’t have an opinion on billionaires specifically. I don’t care if they take home a billion dollars. What I do care about is the ratio of top earner income with median income. It should never exceed 10-30%

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Give them an award saying "Yay, you won capitalism!" then force them to retire and enjoy the rest of their life without ruining any more people's lives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They're a cancer on society.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
88 points (83.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27210 readers
1699 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS