816
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

It's time for that green guy from that one video game that I can't mention because the auto mods are erasing free speech

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago
[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago

It's WeeGee time.

[-] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

I feel like health insurance companies are putting a lot of pressure on people named Mario right now.

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago
[-] donuts@lemmy.world 236 points 1 week ago

You know, at face value he's absolutely right. We shouldn't claim care that is unnecessary or maybe even harmful. But where we disagree is that I think that decision should be left to our medical professionals

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 155 points 1 week ago

Really what it should be is that if a doctor prescribes unnecessary care, they should go after the doctor, not the patient. Doctors have malpractice insurance. If the health insurance can't win a case of malpractice, then they should pay the bill. Why are patients in the midfle here at all.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Patients usually have the least amount of power. That's why.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

My attitude is that if the doctor prescribes unnecessary care there's a professional board for that.

Though let's be real, the health insurance for profit industry is the problem and it's not going to get better until we get rid of it

Yeah, but the professional board is kinda like an HOA board. Should be more like a jury of all regular doctors or something.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago

This is still validating the profit incentive of private health insurance.

If the doctor prescribes unnecessary care, it should be none of these peoples' business, because they shouldn't be allowed any stake in the decision whatsoever.

[-] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

It’s the same trick as rebranding bank robberies to identity theft. It puts the blame on the consumer who can’t afford to defend themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago

Really what it should be is that if a doctor prescribes unnecessary care

That's the core problem. The entity that defines unnecessary care is health insurance. And there are TONS of stories of them denying Diabetes medication for people with diabetes and anti-nausea meds to pediatric patients getting chemo.

If they were doing the right thing, no one would be pissed off. The "recent target" was the one to decided to run on AI driven denials that were denying 90% of care for months.

They are not fulfilling their duty to take the money from the subscribers and pay their righteous medical bills and instead using it as raw profit.

They are employing their own 'doctors' to prove stuff that is definitely necessary is labeled unnecessary.

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Not just meds. Patients with chronic pain are expected to take painkillers for treatment but omg if the doctor prescribes therapy deny that shit. Even though therapy helps faaaar better than medications for chronic pain sufferers.

It's the conflict of interest in the "decision maker"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 week ago

I miss Anonymous. Those fuckers would be figuratively burning down UHC right now.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

they were taken down and then turned into a shell org of the NSA.

it's a honeypot/scapegoat now.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

What actually happened to them? Did key members get tracked down or something?

[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago

I don't have sources, but I seem to recall reading somewhere that the OGs aged out or got caught, and the new gen that replaced them weren't as ideologically driven or competent or something. I think they still technically exist but aren't nearly as influential as they once were

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 34 points 1 week ago

It's also not as easy to hack electronic systems anymore. It's not that they are invulnerable, but the vulnerabilities are generally more complicated and difficult to exploit. Setting aside people still running Windows XP or something, vulnerabilities get patched pretty quickly today. State actors have the time and resources to still do straight up electronic hacking, but opportunities for individuals are sparse.

Of course there is still the human element. Most data breaches done by individuals nowadays rely, at least in part, on social engineering.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What did you expect?

We've been told for years that herp derp the economy is doing amazing! If you don't agree there's something wrong with you! if you got laid off or your corpo landlord raised your rent and you're now dying in the street well then... look everybody! An evil homeless person lowering your property values with their continued existence! Git em!

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

More like, disconnected from reality.

Poh-tay-toh tuh-mah-toh

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago

Did he not have a PR person tell him that video was a bad idea? Or more likely, did he not listen to their advice?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

They simply don't care. What are you going to do? Shoot them?

[-] tkw8@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

Headline says video was leaked. It was probably a private meeting. Agree that it was a stupid thing to say regardless.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
816 points (99.3% liked)

memes

10549 readers
2351 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS