427
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by tryptaminev@feddit.de to c/world@lemmy.world

Edited title to match articles title.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 168 points 1 year ago

I’ve been tracking the comments on all of this across various websites to see what people’s thoughts are. This genuinely might be the most contentious issue of our age. There are people who are vehemently pro Palestine and can dismiss the loss of civilian lives as’ what do you expect when people are pushed like this’ . Then others are hugely pro Israel and see this as an unprovoked attack by a terrorist group and any retaliation is justified.

I think everyone’s shitty here. Hamas is a terrorist organization. They use terrorist practices and target civilians. That’s a terrorist organization. There’s no discussion on that point. Israel is a right wing authoritarian state that regularly commits war crimes. The total Palestinian body count far exceeds the death toll from this attack by orders of magnitude so we can’t pretend like Israel was minding its own business and was attacked.

I don’t think you can point to one or the other as being the true hero or the true victim. It’s the greatest grey area of all time.

I absolutely condemn the Palestinians and Hamas for this act. I absolutely condemn the Israelis for their continued mistreatment and violence towards Palestinians. One will say they only act this way because of the behavior of the other. But at this point where does the original blame for all of it start and end.

The only thing that is certain is that there will be far more blood shed and every dead Israeli will be met with 10 dead Palestinians. I suspect this will be the turning point for this ongoing conflict. And in the future there may no longer be a Palestine as we know it. With the US protecting Israel no other Arab countries will dare intervene militarily. If the Israelis occupy Gaza it’s going to quickly become a quagmire with a never ending insurgency. It will be costly and in ten years Israel will be more unsafe then they were today.

There’s no good answers or good parties here. Just disgusting human nature and the consequences of half baked racist geopolitics from the 40s.

[-] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

But at this point where does the original blame for all of it start

The Brits

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Pretty much the only unbiased take anyone can have. Both sides f*cking suck. I disagree that this is the turning point tho. We've been here before and we'll stay here until both sides come to the table and actually discuss a peaceful resolution to the conflict. It'll never happen with hamas so they have to go. It'll never happen with the current Israeli government so they need to be replaced with more diplomatic leaders. Neither is gonna happen tho, the continued conflict just puts more dependence on the bad actors that keep escalating it. Honestly I see hamas cracking before Israel softens but who knows if or when that'll happen. I wouldn't be surprised if this conflict continued far beyond my lifetime.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I disagree that this is the turning point tho.

Turning point, no, but I can see this being, in retrospect, an erm fulcrum point. Like what 9/11 did to the US, where the question "why do they hate us", besides further idiocy, also led to some legitimate insight into how the US' actions affect the world and provoke reactions, similarly the notion "we bred that monster" might get some more wide-spread traction in Israel.

...and yes this very much is a 9/11 moment for Israel, worse, actually. Caught completely on surprise, the most Jewish deaths and that in a short time-span since the Holocaust, much larger percentage of the population, it's definitely a defining moment.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is why I mainly blame the US and Europe at this point.

Both sides in this situation are controlled by the most disgusting kind of sociopath and the only way to stop this is real (with teeth, not just bullshit talk) international pressure on both sides.

Instead there is real pressure on one side only, by declaring Hamas a terrorist organisation (which they are), whilst without pressure on the other side, the boot of Israel on Palestinian necks creates every day new people with nothing to lose, for whom joining an internationally labelled terrorist organisation is an actual step-up from their situation.

So the worst kind of Israelis have nothing to lose from joining the military or colonates and stealing from and murdering Palestinians because there are zero international sanctions on it, the Israeli authorities fully support it and they have overwhelming force, whilst the worst kind of Palestinians have nothing to lose from joining Hamas and murdering Israelis because they have nothing to lose since the actions of the above mentioned Israelis have made their baseline situation be "a life of misery treated as less than human" and even made any organisation that resists Israel (even one as bad as Hamas) be relativelly prestigious and an actual step-up for many in that environment.

Unless the "solution" envisioned by US and European leaders is genocide of the Palestinians, then both sides have to be put in a situation were they do have something to lose by doing what they've been doing and that means keeping on the pressure on Hamas and extending the sanctions to the Israeli government.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 131 points 1 year ago

I don't know how this will do anything but result in another attack. Making people that desperate is not a solution that will work well. Plus, my fellow Jews should know better than intentionally starving desperate people.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling that was the plan all along

Intentionally antagonize the Palestinians that's already been antagonized for decades .... push them over the edge to make them make the first move.

Then once the first move is made .... move in and completely annihilate them under the guise of justified retaliation.

When it comes to one of the most well organized, well trained, well funded militaries and intelligence organizations in the world .... I don't think anyone can surprise them with a major attack.

The Israelis knew this would happen .... because they know how they will respond.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago

starving Palestinians out like this, will force them into the desperate move attacking Israel. Israel can therefore declare them as terrorists and shoot them indiscriminately.  I hope that I’m wrong and this isn’t a tactical decision

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 year ago

So they will kill all people in Gaza?

[-] nocturne213@lemm.ee 78 points 1 year ago

I always thought that is what Israel wanted anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] roo@lemmy.one 45 points 1 year ago

So, it's an unattended concentration camp, and they hope everyone dies there.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Has been for decades...

It's over 2 million in like 140 sq miles...

They don't have their own police, don't get to vote (Israel won't let them have an election), aren't in control of their own utilities, don't have freedom of movement, and get treated as subhuman.

And Israel wants everyone to believe there's no reason for Palestinians to hate Israel's government.

Put people in those conditions and refuse to treat them as humans, and some of them are going to stop acting like humans. It's basically sociology and would happen to any population in those conditions

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

If history's taught us anything, it's that the good guys always indiscriminately target civilians!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

So if it's a total blockade now, what was it before? (hint: it was also a blockade then, has been since 2007)

It's saddening to see Israel's military (which is not Israel) attack civilians and civilian infrastructure in retaliation for Hamas (which is not Palestine) having attacked civilians and civilian infrastructure- this is all a shit-show of punishing the innocent to get the other side to back down and it will never end.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

They were allowing them access to electricity and food supplies before

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Other nation on land you claim

box them in, stop food shipments

Wait, that kinda reminds me of something recent...

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Making one giant concentration camp.

Huh.

[-] Mammal@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be fair, it already was a giant concentration camp. That's the reason they got uppity in the first place.

[-] thorcik@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

So, a minister of a Jewish state compares another nation to animals and decides that genocide is the proper solution Ironic.gif

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Israel has announced a “total” blockade of the already besieged Gaza Strip, including a ban on food and water, after Hamas carried out the biggest attack on the country in decades.

Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said on Monday authorities would cut electricity and block the entry of food and fuel as part of “a complete siege” on Hamas-run Gaza, where about 2.3 million people live in one of the most densely populated areas in the world.

der crossing points; the third is controlled by Egypt.

“We are putting a complete siege on Gaza … No electricity, no food, no water, no gas – it’s all closed,” Gallant said in a video statement.

Israel’s chief military spokesperson, Daniel Hagari, told reporters on Monday that Israel has “control” of its communities following Saturday’s mass incursion of Hamas fighters into its territory.

Hagari said there had been some isolated incidents on Monday morning, but that “at this stage, there is no fighting in the communities”.

He added that “there might still be terrorists in the region”.

Israeli tanks and drones were guarding openings in the fence to prevent more infiltrations, Hagari said, adding that 15 of 24 border communities had been evacuated, with the rest expected to be evacuated over the next 24 hours.

Earlier, Hamas spokesperson Abdel-Latif al-Qanoua told The Associated Press news agency that the group’s fighters continued to battle outside Gaza and had captured more Israelis as recently as Monday morning.

He said the group aims to free all Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, which in the past has agreed to lopsided exchange deals in which it released large numbers of prisoners for individual captives or even the remains of soldiers.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I am not sure they understand what total means. Hamas didn't get those rockets from Israel - hense there must be an unmonitored way in from Egypt that Hamas controls.

If there is, all food comes now from Hamas = Palestinians support Hamas more. If that gets cut, videos of mass starvation will eventually pull other Muslim countries into the conflict.

[-] generalpotato@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That’s what Israel wants. They want Iran to get pulled in and then further justify asking the West for more military aid and “support” to launch another “war” in it’s “defense”. Fucking terrorist regime in power unfortunately for Palestinians and Israelis.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All those who condemned Hamas for attacking civilians, I wonder if they will have the same energy when Israel starves civilians?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Yes. I condemn both. And I don't play the "which is worse" game. They are both unacceptable evils. Israel needs to stop this immediately and, at the very least, negotiate a peace if not some sort of solution to the whole issue (hopefully including at least some right of return) and Hamas needs to return the hostages.

You don't need to pick a side when both sides are committing atrocities.

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

One of these “sides” could unilaterally peacefully end the conflict. For the other side choosing “peace” just means submitting to living under an occupying force as eternal second class citizens. insert mlk quote here.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

I'm sure this will in no way backfire.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

It'll escalate the conflict...

Which is what Israels government wants...

So yeah, it's not going to backfire, it's going to do exactly what they want.

Same way using the IDF to make sure Palestinians couldn't fight back against "settlers" just escalated the conflict. If Israel wanted peace, that backfired. But they don't want peace. They want a war so they can use it as an excuse to expand their borders again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

People want revolutionaries under constant oppression and inequality to fight a "fair, modern war" against one of the most well-funded militaries in the region.

Are people stupid? Palestine, unlike Ukraine, doesn't have the privilege of fighting an equal war.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Kofu@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

So, normal occupation stuff then? They have very little drinking water already.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Having access to a few litres for drinking, cooking and minimal hygiene is still a far stretch away from having no access to clean water.

Typical water use in developed countries ranges between 100 litres and 400 litres a day per person, but you can get by temporarily with as little as 15 litres per person and day. https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/water-sanitation-and-health/environmental-health-in-emergencies/humanitarian-emergencies

Fully cutting the water supply like announced is a severe escalation of the humanitarian situation and beyond the "normal occupation stuff."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
427 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2141 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS