262
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump submitted a Supreme Court filing opposing a TikTok ban, citing his “dealmaking expertise” and promising to resolve national security concerns.

The brief advocates delaying the case to allow Trump to address it politically.

Legal experts criticized the filing for being overly self-promotional and unprecedented, with some mistaking it for satire.

Critics noted its unusual tone and highlighted the involvement of Trump’s potential solicitor general pick, D. John Sauer, in drafting the document.

The case concerns TikTok’s alleged violations of privacy laws and ties to China.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

First h1b. Now pro China social media? Surely his base won't notice.

[-] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

doesn't matter to him anymore. either he gets his way and elections will be rigged, or he won't be have another term

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So ByteDance sent some inauguration money his way.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I alone can tik this tok...or tok this tik...or whatever.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

I feel like we used to refer to future executives as “President-elect” in the period before they took office. But then I’m an American, what the fuck do I know?

[-] CybertoothTiger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Is it because he's already been president so he still gets the title? I also have genuinely no idea.

[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yes, former presidents retain the title. Obama is still respectfully addressed as "President Obama" by non-racists.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

promising to resolve national security concerns

The guy with boxes of TS documents in his bathroom suddenly cares about national security? I don't think so.

[-] asret@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Why not? He was personally seeing to their security.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

That doesn’t sound right, but as an American, I don’t have the wherewithal to find fault with your premise.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This was always the tactic. gop attacked tiktok, which is extremely popular, if trump lost they'd insist on the "ban" and try to hang the unpopularity of the move that they demanded on Biden. If trump won, they'd chicken shit away from the move, claim trump "saved" something to try to grab opportunistic popularity moment as fuel for the next ghoulish move they need to make publicly that will lose them goodwill.

America is decidedly fucked. The general public isn't equipped to see below the surface layer of this shit.

[-] boogiebored@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

“two santas” strategy.

[-] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 92 points 2 days ago

All the while in China TikTok is forbidden. They have a Chinese version called Douyin, and it limits the content to educational instead of entertainment and the time spent to maximum 2 hours for people under 18.

What does it tell you that the Chinese government itself wants to protect their people from the influence of TikTok?

It's simply a propaganda tool to influence people and it keeps them addicted using an algorithm. It's a highly specialized psy ops tool. It makes the world dumber and uses the same addictiveness to educate the Chinese at the same time.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah my brother loves his TikTok and so does my dad. I watched my brother he will just endlessly scroll and watch the dumbest shit you can imagine. That not even all the alt right shit he consumes on there. Hell I had to do a quick google search to prove a post as fake. Some rando says the tiger king was pardon or Biden was rounding up trump supporters and my brother bought it. I prove both post wrong and tried to explain that it was a propaganda tool to keep him stupid and in the dark. Still uses it.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

If that's sufficient for a ban, then most or all the rest of social and mass media would qualify as well.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 days ago

I accept your terms.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

What does it tell you that the Chinese government itself wants to protect their people from the influence of TikTok?

Absolutely nothing?

This is a country that has incredibly authoritarian laws on the books regarding the internet because it doesn't want it's people reading """""western propaganda"""", why would we assume it's reason for continuing that behaviour isn't the same as it's always been: bullshit

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago

Douyin content is very similar to TikTok content. There are many popular douyin creators whose content gets copied to TikTok. There's loads of makeup, cosplay, cooking, skit, DIY, etc. Mukbang style content is very popular there as well. Their makeup and fashion content, like on TikTok, is sponsored by huge international brands like Mac and Gucci and others along those lines. Also super popular is pet content, like people who run cat shelters and dog walkers and stuff. There is also no age verification to use the app unless you want to post or comment yourself, and there is no time limit to use it. Some TikTok creators get reposted to douyin as well, but the overwhelming majority of people in china do not speak English, and to post on it, you need to be a citizen of China. Not that there aren't ways around it, but it's harder than it's worth.

I get that you're paranoid about Chinese international political interference, rightfully so in some ways. But this is just blatant lies and fear mongering. I've used the app extensively myself to follow some makeup content creators from China. It's functionally identical to TikTok. Censorship does exist, but it's based around specific events, mostly from what i can tell. I don't use to find political content, but I wouldn't be surprised if they censored content based on stuff like the Honk Kong protests. Propaganda is also on there, most likely, but I never encounter it in my feed.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

it limits the content to educational instead of entertainment and the time spent to maximum 2 hours for people under 18

That sounds WAY too nanny state restrictive to me and I'm SCANDINAVIAN!

the Chinese government itself wants to protect their people

Good one 😆

It's simply a propaganda tool to influence people and it keeps them addicted using an algorithm. It's a highly specialized psy ops tool. It makes the world dumber

Same has been truthfully said about Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. The behavior of Meta and Musk aren't any better and your data isn't any more safe from ending up in the hands of hostile and/or totalitarian governments such as those of India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, or Israel.

The REAL reason why politician want to ban Tiktok is that it's the only serious competitor to the other radicalization machines whose parent companies and key people "just happen to" donate a lot more money to those same politicians than ByteDance does. The official reasons are just a smoke screen.

I'd be fine with it if they were actually honest about it and banned the aforementioned American competitors too, though. Short of that, banning Tiktok doesn't really solve any problems without exacerbating others.

Oh, and for all its censorship on behalf of the Chinese government, Tiktok is also the only major social media platform that doesn't heavily censor legitimate protest against the fascist apartheid regime of Israel.

I'm sure that the push has NOTHING to do with the fact that most if not all of the politicians in favor are taking a ton of blood money from AIPAC and other de facto Israeli government entities badly disguised as American nonprofits either! 🙄

[-] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago

Everyone needs to stop thinking Trump is some master of satire, or that he is gasp unprecedented. Yeah, we fucking know, pay attention! He’s been beyond the pale and indistinguishable from a sketch comedy dropout for decades now. These “legal experts” need to either learn a goddamn lesson for once, or just shut the fuck up about him, you’re not helping by being too unimaginative to recognize reality.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 day ago

I wish he was unpresidented

Nick Kroll was right. Trump is super entertaining. So give him a talk show, not control of a country.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

man, I cannot stand listening to that asshat talk. It's just word gibberish and always about himself.

But if he renounced his presidency and started a morning talkshow? I'd probably watch it. Just for the schadenfreude.

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

trump meets with CEO of TickTok

I'm sure the conversation was legit and above board and this filing had nothing to do with the visit.

There's definitely not going to be a massive donation to his inauguration fund.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 days ago

We’ll see how idiotic and servile the Supreme Court will be under Trump. Good to know early on.

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Yeah the outcome of this will be telling. From a legal standpoint it should be clear - Congress has passed a law and the president has signed it into law.

Trumps plans and intentions are irrelevant - he should need congress to pass a new law to undo this one. It'd be bizarre for the Supreme Court to undermine the law based on a whim of the president elect.

But if the Supreme Court do go along with trumps whims then we'll have a very clear idea how bad things have already gotten. However it's clear things are already pretty fucking bad as the US constitution and infrastructure failed to stop an insurrectionist getting power.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

But if the Supreme Court do go along with trumps whims then we’ll have a very clear idea how bad things have already gotten. However it’s clear things are already pretty fucking bad as the US constitution and infrastructure failed to stop an insurrectionist getting power.

part of me is wondering if this isn't a sounding board by trump to see if they'll toe the line. (They'll toe the line because they're cucks who like to watch.)

[-] mercphilby@discuss.online 26 points 2 days ago

“You see, I made a deal with them… and I don’t get paid if they get banned”

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago
[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
262 points (96.8% liked)

News

23684 readers
3352 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS