this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
442 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

67825 readers
8404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Its too bad that some people seem to not comprehend all chatgpt is doing is word prediction. All it knows is which next word fits best based on the words before it. To call it AI is an insult to AI... we used to call OCR AI, now we know better.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Negative IQ points?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

Something bizarre is happening to media organizations that use 'clicks' as a core metric.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It depends: are you in Soviet Russia ?

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

In the US, so as of 1/20/25, sadly yes.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 86 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

I couldn’t be bothered to read the article, so I got ChatGPT to summarise it. Apparently there’s nothing to worry about.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

i can feel it too when I use it. that is why i use it only for trivial things if at all.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 42 points 2 days ago

That is peak clickbait, bravo.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

chatbots and ai are just dumber 1990s search engines.

[–] mycelium_underground@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember 90s search engines. AltaVista was pretty ok a t searching the small web that existed, but I'm pretty sure I can get better answers from the LLMs tied to Kagi search.

AltaVista also got blown out of the water by google(back when it was just a search engine), and that was in the 00s not the 90s. 25 to 35 years ago is a long time, search is so so much better these days(or worse if you use a "search" engine like Google now).

Don't be the product.

[–] BlackAura@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depending on what I needed I remember using AltaVista, AskJeeves, Dogpile, and I feel like later on MetaCrawler or something like that (would search multiple search engines for you and ordered them scored based on platform and relevancy iirc?)

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I miss AskJeeves. Those were some great commercials too.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 131 points 3 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HappinessPill@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

Do you guys remember when internet was the thing and everybody was like: "Look, those dumb fucks just putting everything online" and now is: "Look at this weird motherfucker that don't post anything online"

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I remember when internet was a place

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Remember when people used to say and believe "Don't believe everything you read on the internet?"

I miss those days.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

TIL becoming dependent on a tool you frequently use is "something bizarre" - not the ordinary, unsurprising result you would expect with common sense.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 days ago (10 children)

If you actually read the article Im 0retty sure the bizzarre thing is really these people using a 'tool' forming a roxic parasocial relationship with it, becoming addicted and beginning to see it as a 'friend'.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 36 points 2 days ago (7 children)

now replace chatgpt with these terms, one by one:

  • the internet
  • google
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • tiktok
  • reddit
  • lemmy
  • their cell phone
  • news media
  • television
  • radio
  • podcasts
  • junk food
  • money
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 245 points 3 days ago (17 children)

people tend to become dependent upon AI chatbots when their personal lives are lacking. In other words, the neediest people are developing the deepest parasocial relationship with AI

Preying on the vulnerable is a feature, not a bug.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

And it's beyond obvious in the way LLMs are conditioned, especially if you're used them long enough to notice trends. Where early on their responses were straight to the point (inaccurate as hell, yes, but that's not what we're talking about in this case) today instead they are meandering and full of straight engagement bait - programmed to feign some level of curiosity and ask stupid and needless follow-up questions to "keep the conversation going." I suspect this is just a way to increase token usage to further exploit and drain the whales who tend to pay for these kinds of services, personally.

There is no shortage of ethical quandaries brought into the world with the rise of LLMs, but in my opinion the locked-down nature of these systems is one of the most problematic; if LLMs are going to be the commonality it seems the tech sector is insistent on making happen, then we really need to push back on these companies being able to control and guide them in their own monetary interests.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 105 points 3 days ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] jamie_oliver@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I knew a guy I went to rehab with. Talked to him a while back and he invited me to his discord server. It was him, and like three self trained LLMs and a bunch of inactive people who he had invited like me. He would hold conversations with the LLMs like they had anything interesting or human to say, which they didn't. Honestly a very disgusting image, I left because I figured he was on the shit again and had lost it and didn't want to get dragged into anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not a lot of meat on this article, but yeah, I think it's pretty obvious that those who seek automated tools to define their own thoughts and feelings become dependent. If one is so incapable of mapping out ones thoughts and putting them to written word, its natural they'd seek ease and comfort with the "good enough" (fucking shitty as hell) output of a bot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I know a few people who are genuinely smart but got so deep into the AI fad that they are now using it almost exclusively.

They seem to be performing well, which is kind of scary, but sometimes they feel like MLM people with how pushy they are about using AI.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wake me up when you find something people will not abuse and get addicted to.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›