231
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Mike Johnson’s meteoric elevation from an under-the-radar congressman from Louisiana to second-in-line to the U.S. presidency sent journalists, Democrats and Republicans alike to uncover information about the personal and professional history of the most right-wing and least experienced House Speaker in history, who took the top job on Wednesday.

On the day Johnson was voted in, several major right-wing social media accounts on X, formerly known as Twitter, began circulating clips of an interview Johnson gave to PBS in 2020, in which he told journalist Walter Isaacson that the police killing of George Floyd was “an act of murder” and called for “systemic change.” Notably, Johnson said in the interview that he had learned about racism in America through the experience of raising a Black son, Michael.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 167 points 1 year ago

Wait, what? This isn't something to be criticized for. Having a black adopted son and learning the realities of racism in America and learning from it is a good thing. He should be criticized for all the other shit, but not this.

[-] memfree@lemmy.ml 111 points 1 year ago

They aren't complaining that he had a black son, but that he's an "undercover Democrat" because he's stated that he learned about racism from the kid, saying things like, “Michael being a Black American, and Jack being white Caucasian. They have different challenges,” he said. “My son Jack has an easier path. He just does.”

Further, there was a question as to if the kid was real since there are no photos. That led to the new clarification:

Speculation about whether Michael was a real person prompted Johnson’s office to clarify. “When Speaker Johnson first ran for Congress in 2016, he and his wife, Kelly, spoke to their son Michael—who they took in as newlyweds when Michael was 14 years old,” said Corinne Day, Johnson’s communications director, in a statement first reported by Newsweek. “At the time of the Speaker’s election to Congress, Michael was an adult with a family of his own. He asked not to be involved in their new public life.” Day added that Johnson “maintains a close relationship with Michael to this day.”

So if we are to believe him, there are no photos because that is the way the now-adult kid wants it.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not going to believe a dang thing any Conservative says without concrete evidence and peer review.

If the black kid adoption story is real, there will be photos, and someone will be able to produce them. If there are no photos, it's all a lie.

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You should apply that practice to all politicians. They never tell the truth if a lie will serve.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not saying you're wrong. But the right has a habit of only showing empathy only when it directly affects them.

Black people deserve protection from the law, yes. But let's not pretend that he'd change his tune about LGBT people in a split second if his son turned out to be gay or trans.

[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Black people don’t deserve protection from the law. Black people deserve equal treatment under the law.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 47 points 1 year ago

It’s not at all something to criticize, it’s noble to adopt a child. It’s his party base that will pillory him.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

He hasn't legally adopted this "son" and he's not shown in any family photos.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And he had a history of making up bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)

I think he's being criticized because, as per the article 'there are no pictures of his “adopted" child in public family photos.'

So either he lied altogether or he didn't want to be seen publicly with him. Since he spoke about it publicly, that might not be the actual reason

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

Let's see the long-form ~~birth certificate~~ family photos first!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Having a black adopted son and learning the realities of racism in America and learning from it is a good thing

Has he learned from it, though? I don't know enough to know about if he has or not.

Also, what were the motives in raising that kid? A lot of evangelical christians view adoption as a way to proselytize and they tend to treat those kids like shit- and usually white washing the kid. (see, for example, most adoption campaigns run by christian organizations... especially those that specialize in placing foreign kids- or indigenous kids.)

I can't speak to their motives, either, but the nobility of an act depends entirely on the motives behind the act. if somebody, for example, offs putin only to gain power themselves and continue on... that is quite different than offing putin to end the war in ukraine, yes?

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

I find it really odd they were able to get an adopted child immediately after getting married. I have some friends who've been trying to adopt unsuccessfully for years and they're fairly straight-edge professionals.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

from NYT

In his public remarks over the years, Mr. Johnson describes Michael as his son and did not correct an interviewer who described Michael as “adopted.” Ms. Day said in an interview that the Johnsons did not formally adopt Michael because of the “lengthy adoption process.” Ms. Day declined to say whether Michael was using “Johnson” as his surname.

So, I'm not sure who Day is, that's the only time they mention her. but apparently Ms Day is saying that, it wasn't a "real" adoption. whatever that means. non legal, but the kid lived with them? they abducted him? he really is his son, but didn't want to admit that?

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

So we have another Gaetz on our hand with this mystery boy who previously lived with him but is of no relation or guardianship?

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Are they trying to adopt a teenager?

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

From another reply, it seems they never actually filled out any paperwork to adopt the guy so apparently he just lived with them for a little bit if he actually exists at all.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Adopted in this sense of the word that I had a friend stay by me for a few days when he was in town. Gotcha

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

The right wing doesn't like that he has a black son.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

That's why McCain lost to Bush Jr.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can thank Karl Rove for that.

McCain's adopted daughter is from Bangladesh, by the way.

[-] Teon@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

So his 'black son' was born in 1985 and is now 38.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That kid’s going to be so scarred.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Lol the secret exposed news that he's actually not racist is a controversy, but there's zero issues against his intense anti gay stance.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They all lie to get to power. They all tell us what we want to hear so we will elevate them to this power. If a politician is moving their mouth, they are lying.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
231 points (96.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
3367 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS