this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
959 points (99.5% liked)

News

28528 readers
4662 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 246 points 1 week ago (6 children)

People who got money to vote should be named and shamed.

[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 126 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it should be illegal. that's bribery

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 136 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's already illegal. Unless the rich do it, of course.

[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pisses me off they get no accountability. when if you or I did it we would be locked up imminently.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We face legal justice. They face vigilante justice.

All we need is someone willing to pull the trigger and skilled enough to hit their target.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And willing to die in prison or be executed. That makes the numbers much smaller.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Unless I have the law wrong, he skirted the law. He didn't pay anyone to vote (although he originally said he was), he technically only paid them to sign a petition. The law afaik only says you can't pay people to vote (regardless of who, in Wisconsin you straight up cannot pay people to vote at all), you can pay them to sign a petition.

However I would argue that by first announcing that the money would go only to people who voted and then subtly changing it later is still totally a form of bribery. People absolutely voted for a chance at that money because of his original statement and didn't know it changed. But I'm going to go out on a limb here and say he'll be 100% fine because of technicalities (aka he's rich as shit and is completely untouchable)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 87 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It was a pledge to vote, not legally binding. A lot of desperate people these days, and I can't say I wouldn't try to scam elon out of a million bucks if given the opportunity. "Sure sure, I'll totally vote how you want Mr Musky sir. Make sure you spell my name right on the check now."

[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah my internet history alone would eliminate me from that running.

The winners are "pre selected". Thats how his bullshit workaround works. Its been admitted. But for the uninformed, it sounds like a lottery.

It isnt.

even if a communist or anarchist or whatever tried to play the game and if it were a true lottery, you would be committing a far worse disservice by keeping quiet at this point.

Stay quiet and maybe get a million. Its the democrat way if you look at our current dem politicians... do you really want to be like them right now?

[–] MordercaSkurwysyn@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

Every lottery run by private business is not a lottery but transfer of money from gullible to someone's friends and family.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Understandable.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Even so, the point of such laws is to be as impartial as possible. That's not possible once people start accepting stuff. Doesn't matter if they can still technically not vote.

It's not because it's guaranteed to sway votes, but because it could.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I almost guarantee he canceled those checks the second she won.

[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some of those people probably took the money and voted Democrat anyway.

If someone was trying to bride me for a vote I'd take their money and still vote for whoever I wanted.

What's he going to do? Look over my shoulder and verify who I voted for?

[–] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Still, it probably has a chilling ef fect. Voting Dems becomes like a secret you have to keep rather than something you should shout from the roofs - less likely to make that post on social media, put up a sticker or a sign, tell your friend and family etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Point taken.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

I think he is skirting the law by having the payments be for signing a petition tangential to a vote, but not directly about voting. It's scummy to say the least, and if you did sign, you'll probably get spam calls and mail for the rest of your life. At least in this case, the outcome was that Elon didn't get his preferred candidate to win, he's wasting money paying people to get on his mailing list, and now when Tesla's Wisconsin case gets to the state supreme court, Crawford will be on the court

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 141 points 1 week ago

The language used is super interesting. "Defying Elon Musk"

Defying. A terrifying word, yet appropriate.

Musk has no position in the Wisconsin state government. He's not a constituent. You shouldn't be able to "defy" him because he has no position of authority.

Yet they used the word "defying" and it's terrifyingly the correct word.

[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 104 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eat Shit Elon Wasted 20 million for nothing.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 73 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If we would assume that musk's wealth is $400,000 then spending $20m is just $20.

To us this is massive amount for him it is $20.

And he bought US president for just $300.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we would assume that musk’s wealth is $400,000

Hopefully with Tesla stock crashing, this can be a reality

[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

hopefully it will be $0.00000

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fine, he lost twenty bucks then, Im thrilled.

I hope the anxiety causes him to smoke his entire ketamine stash in one sitting.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

It’s okay. He still has billions more to piss away.

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago

A Mandate to tell Elon to eat shit.

[–] whyalone@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago

Still 45% too many idiots

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago

Jesus. Turns out bribery has a cost o.o

[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago

This is the best news in 7 months

[–] bingBingBongBong@lemm.ee 55 points 1 week ago

I hope elon cries tonight, and hates its life now

[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Andr3w222@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No one wants Elons Sieg heil shit.

[–] Helvetica@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago

Eat shit Musk.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Empire was fought to a standstill, and Lady Crawford Organa took her seat on the high judicial council.

Or maybe it's just the judicial council. I dunno. I'm high.

But well done Wisconsin - the force was fucking with you today!

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago

You know it sort of looked like that tonight lol

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's small, but this is definitely a win worth celebrating.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 27 points 1 week ago

For Wisconsin itself, it's huge. It keeps breathing room available at the state level.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Prediction: Trump will come out saying that Cory Booker’s record-breaking speech was a smokescreen to distract from the fact that George Soros was stealing votes in this election.

I wish I wasn’t serious.

[–] ThraawnSolo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago

Hell yeah!!! Fuck you!

[–] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 1 week ago

Another bad investment by the Muskrat.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago

Ah thank goodness!

[–] match@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i sure hope they take up the case on Musk's voter bribes

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SupaTuba@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I genuinely believe this was his way of getting involved in a "lower stakes" election, performing the same bribery as he did in the federal election, normalizing it, and using the Democrats victory as "proof" that he couldn't have cheated the federal election.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Elon you can shove it where the sun don’t shine.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Arrest Musk!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

M.U.S.K. (Make United States Kneel). How one South African tried to topple the american superpower.

load more comments
view more: next ›