this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
163 points (97.1% liked)

News

28902 readers
4652 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House has begun the process of looking for a new leader at the Pentagon to replace Pete Hegseth, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly. This comes as Hegseth is again mired in controversy over sharing military operational details in a group chat.

The defense secretary is under fire after revelations that he shared classified information in a group chat with his wife, brother and lawyer, according to the official.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It won't mean anything. Whoever they pick will likewise be an incompetent fascist cretin, just like WhiskeyLeaks.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

WhiskeyLeaks

Thank you for this.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Wish I could claim credit for it, but I just stole it from much wittier folks.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's the problem? Are they having trouble finding somebody less qualified?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Rob Schneider isn't busy, they should call him.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Did anybody find the transcript for this second leak? The first one was so cringe and I'd love to read this one as well.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Who woulda think a brain dead, drunk, abusive, warped looking ken doll, wouldn't have the ability to lead the world's most powerful army.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But will they find another perfect symbiosis of bootlickery and incompetence?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If they ask me, I'll do it

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They might... Do you drink on the job? Are you creepy to women? Do you require your spouse to be on work calls? If you answered yes, then you probably qualify!

Take a shot and say that again.

Really, it’s part of the qualifications.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But will you possibly quit drinking if they do?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 23 hours ago
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who could have seen this coming!

[–] rslogix89@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Everyone “accidentally sucked” into the WH text chain.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The appointment isn't valid unless announced in a secret group chat (with people who shouldn't be part of that group).

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Nah, its fine. Remember? He learned his lesson the first time! There was no reason to refuse him office when he was initially appointed! And definitely should not have been alarmed the first time his Signal chats leaked! Nobody would have thought that he would leak it a second time a month or two after the first leak!

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

How many Mooches is a Hegseth? 9? 10?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Churning through leaders usually comes right before a business catastrophically implodes. It's not a good sign for the health of the system.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Na, it's been like this in Trump 1. It's because they realy do not give a fuck about humans, even the ones on their side. They are just pawns to be used and disregarded at will.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Not to disagree with your point about failing businesses but the context is so different here; the US government is functioning beautifully. Best functioning ever. Nationally, internationally, top marks. Economy, society, technology top marks. Personnel? Amazing, qualified, competent, trustworthy, discerning, strategic, long-term serious brains on these folks. Need I mention the utter rock-solid stability we've witnessed? It's...hard to describe.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought Trump just said he was standing behind Hegseth.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

He's just waiting for the bus to come by.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Apparently Hegseth didn't get the hint to bend over

[–] doug@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

I hope I get to laugh in Pete’s face at least once before I die.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago