this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
620 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

9587 readers
2200 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

I am a fan. I have joy.

[–] theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not Canadian, Thank you Canada, there is hope after all.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Its complicated; I cant really see the hope for these reasons. Canada had a housing crisis 10 years ago, prices were way too high relative to incomes. The shortage then worsened and prices ratcheted up as we increased immigration.

In 2023 we had huge asset price inflation like most places, due to QE from the Bank of Canada that was used to fund Covid stimulus, which caused asset values to skyrocket. We took in over a million people that year to sustain asset prices and keep wages depressed. This is known as the phillips curve, its generally expected wages rise after inflation due to wage pressure, as people ask for raises to deal with the rising cost of living.

https://thehub.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Fig1_AnnualPopulationGrowth_graph_v1-1170x839.jpg

Canada's main cities are now within the top 10 most expensive cities in the world. The income required to afford to live there is above 200k, while the median wage is only 70k a year.

https://globalnews.ca/news/10572326/impossibly-unaffordable-housing-vancouver-report/

Carney promised to cap immigration at 1% population growth a year, which is 415,000 people a year. Annual deaths are at around 320,000, and births about 360,000 people, so we will grow at around 465,000 people a year. Given in 2022 we welcomed the most we have ever welcomed at 405,000, where prices were already rising dramatically, I dont see how the cost of living gets any better for young people. I actually dont see a single change to the existing Liberal plan at all, they were basically expecting that exact same number in 2022.

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2022/11/an-immigration-plan-to-grow-the-economy.html

[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

There's hope but this was too close. The Conservatives upped their numbers as did the Liberals. It was only the progressive/reasonable vote banding together that saved the day.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 46 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So crazy that the Conservative Party still has 144 seats given that they've basically signed on to a policy of foreign occupation.

Feels like I'm watching liberated France send Philippe PΓ©tain back in as the Loyal Opposition with 40% of the vote.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That's not what their base believes. There is a whole other fantasy reality in their channels about how Carney has planned all along to cut a secret deal with Trump after the election. Other justification narratives probably exist as well, because they have to keep people believing that obviously, everyone knows we couldn't possibly do anything other than completely fold into Trump's plans. They spew propagandistic garbage like this and teach people to distrust legit media that understands context and checks facts rather than running with conspiracy theories based on flimsy evidence.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The conservatives still turned out a lot of votes. The left just voted strategically to keep them out. Next election the left will split again and we will get the conservatives again. Given the parties recent history even if it isn't Poilievre I'm sure they will pick another alt right sycophant.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Next election the left will split again and we will get the conservatives again.

Rather than settling for the investment banker, they could all rally around a candidate that's interested in social good.

The Left doesn't have to split.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The left has to get their shit together before that can happen. Right now the left cares more about purity tests over being effective.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Right now the left cares more about purity tests

People care about who they can trust. Far to much liberal politics revolves around lying, cheating, and scamming voters, donors, and activists.

You can't have a viable Left in a country that's too cynical to better better things are possible.

[–] walktheplank@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

People are gonna hate this but here it is...

From my point of view as a disabled Canadian with a young family, who is close to many members of the local first Nations community, the left is as fascist as the right.

They treat minorities and disabled people like chattel. We live in poverty and are actively pursued if we attempt to bring ourselves out of it. At the same time they bail out our own billionaire olygarchs who have much more than they could ever need. They allow them to flaunt the laws of our country and give them a mere "slap on the wrist" for any infractions though they could pay hundreds of millions easily that could be used for better services for all Canadians.

Let's all start calling it what it is and stop being nice about things. They need us to be poor and sick so there is fear in the so called middle class of ending up like us. Of losing everything because you got sick or hurt at work. Maybe your skin is the wrong color, your sex isn't typical or your government has been trying to exterminate you for your entire existence. One little misstep or even something out of your control and your life is fucked forever.

They need you to go to work and to vote for them. They need you not to challenge them and hate one another because of your political beliefs, your racism or sexism, or your implied class. They need you to forget about us and argue with us. They need you to keep us down. And you do.

Until someone starts standing up for the little guys over here screaming at you, we will continue to be a fascist dictatorship to a portion of our population and the vast majority of people on both sides of the political spectrum couldn't give a fuck.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not if we have ranked choice voting with proportional representation.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Ranked choice doesn't make sense in a proportional representation system.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

It does if you still want to have a local representative, although everything seems to be party politics these days.

I'd be happy enough with proportional representation, though.

[–] jszym@cosocial.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thefool@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

What's the difference between that and STV?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

It’s beautiful

[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 28 points 12 hours ago
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 30 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

If Canada had Australian-style preferential voting (i.e. you numbered your candidates in order of preference, and if your first choice got eliminated, your vote cascaded to your second, and so on until it was tallied for your least-disliked of the two leading candidates), the Liberals would have a significantly more comfortable margin (assuming that they got most of the Greens’ preferences and at least half of the NDP)

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I believe the whole world would be in much better shape if everyone handled elections like Australia. We certainly wouldn't have had Trump ever here. When more people vote the Democrats win every time.

I strongly support mandatory voting. If you're against voting at all for whatever reason, just turn in a blank form. And I'm no big fan of the Democrats, but they wouldn't be kidnapping people to send them to concentration camps.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 4 hours ago

If we had ranked choice or some other system, dems and repubs would both lose to third parties that actually represent the people

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 26 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

We were supposed to get election reform after the liberals won in 2015 and I'm still quite bitter about it

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You will never get it top down. The major parties all prefer and benefit from different systems.

If you truely care about electoral reform your best bet is bottom up. Start getting your preferred form into municipal elections. We almost had that in Ontario until Doug showed up and fucked us.

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Actually, I live in the first municipality in Canada to use ranked choice voting-- until the provincial government enacted a bill that disallowed it in 2020.

I've also been around long enough to have voted in the last Ontario referendum on the topic. It did not go well because people didn't understand what was being proposed. Same story for BC's referendum.

I'm merely pointing out the recurring theme over the last couple of decades where the LPC will make electoral reform promises they never fulfill.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Same story here in Colorado, everyone said it was 'too complicated' which translates to 'we're just straight up dumb'

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 hours ago

Thoroughly hilarious. Go away Chode boy, nobody likes you!

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 41 points 15 hours ago (20 children)

A very important thing to remember this election: The Conservatives had a 30-point lead and were set to gain over 200 seats in a sweeping majority victory and they blew it. They blew it and their leader lost his own seat. The fact we even have a Liberal minority at all is incredible.

So while the Conservative party still has a lot of seats, enough Canadians disliked PP and his campaign enough to erode a 30 point lead. PP says he is staying on as party leader but his party would be incredibly foolish to keep him. His campaign cost them a historical election victory and the dude can't even get elected in his own riding.

Happy that the Trump presidency could at least contribute one positive outcome.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 158 points 19 hours ago (43 children)

Look at how close it was. Canada may want to start stomping down the Trump wannabes now or they will be where the US is in about 10 years (or sooner).

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

FUCK OFF BACK HOME PIERRE HAHAHAHAHAHA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 51 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully this will signal to the Conservatives that Canadians don't have any use for a demagogue who attributes the world's ills to "wokeness," but I'm not holding my breath.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί