this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
87 points (93.9% liked)

Canada

9591 readers
2094 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I think the only people looking at riding projections or riding history are us nerds who discuss politics on lemmy. I think strategic voting in the general public is very real, but it seems to more take the form of "I normally vote NDP and will vote Liberal this time" rather than digging into the politics of their riding.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 27 points 1 day ago

really sad that FPTP here led to the inevitable outcome: the only party that shouldn’t have won did win

[–] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Check the vote totals from 2021 to 2025. The NDP switched to Liberals and the PPC switched to the CPC. That's why the CPC won.

So, basically, the Liberals didn't switch and the NDP switched to the wrong party.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, why the fuck would you vote NDP in a riding where the Greens actually have a chance (or vice versa)?

Their platforms have way more in common than they differ.

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah that's exactly what I thought would happen. Come in here thinking "of course, people will find a way to blame the NDP here instead of the liberals" instantly proved right.

NDP incumbent beaten by people moving to liberals? Those NDP voters, who still had more than the liberals, should've voted libral. Green voters move to the Librals against the incombant? Nah, those dastardly NDP caused this. Cons win by a landslide? Somehow, you guessed it, NDPs fault

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not blaming the NDP voters in this riding instead of the Liberal voters, I'm blaming them alongside the Lib voters.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago
[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This angers me. How can you not understand the concept of vote splitting, and vote against a well-supported (and deserving) incumbent? For shame.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 19 points 1 day ago

either way it’s bad: either vote splitting happens or people vote strategically and not actually what they want

FPTP is a fucking scourge

[–] moody 16 points 1 day ago

I'd argue that a pretty large proportion of voters know nothing about who they're voting for besides the party they represent.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 20 hours ago

Most voters are going to spend a couple of hours watching CBC, or at best, look at a summary of party platforms, and be told only about leader/party politics. No one is out teaching people how to vote under our system. Low information is a problem for democracy.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope you're not blaming the voter. All blame lies in the politician, the moment they put their name on the poll this will 100% happen. They should've done some homework to prevent this.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, the party and the politician are the root cause, but I do hold some expectations for the voter as well. If we're getting people out to vote even if they're entirely ignorant of the process and outcome, I don't see that as a win.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Would PR have fixed this, though? Or could those votes for Mike Morrice, who worked hard for his riding and deserved another session in Parliament, simply have gone to elect some other Green in a floating seat?

With a fixed number of seats, we can't all get the representatives we want. Members of a party are not fungible.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Maybe not PR. But ranked choice voting sure would have!

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a lot of people would feel free to vote for the representative they truly want instead of feeling forced to vote strategically against someone they don't want

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That doesn't really address my point. Yes, voting patterns would have been different. But lets say this is how the vote turned out.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 20 hours ago

I don't know for sure, but under PR, 4 or 5 "presincts" around Kitchener would be amalgamated to select 4 or 5 members of parliament from the pool. I'm not positive if Greens would need 20-25% of vote for 1 seat across all of Kitchener, but it would be the Green that got the most votes that would get the seat. Someone around here knows more than me, but I don't know if there is a risk of party infighting if "the best they can hope for is x seats"

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anything* But Conservative (* some conditions apply). 🤪