this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
592 points (98.8% liked)

News

29202 readers
3810 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Who wants to tell him that we get that right whether he supports it or not?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Remember when he wouldn't put his hand in the Bible when he took his oath of office?

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This isn’t facebook, no one cares if he follows esoteric religious traditions.

The problem is that he won’t follow legal requirements that protect us normal people.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but it's funny that his base of evangelical Christians doesn't give a shit.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Unsurprising because from what I've seen they don't give a shit about the actual teachings of Christ.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

You mean the brown Palestinian Jewish socialist? Yeah they would be hanging him if he came back.

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Immediately disqualified from office. Whoever stops this menace is going to be considered a national hero, regardless of their methods.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Dear Canada and Europe, please save us from the Republicans.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Fuck that. I wanna know where all my sharpshooter vets are at. I'm a Navy Nuke. I don't have the skills to pull it off, but I'll give it the old college try if he comes to my neck of the woods. He is a clear and present domestic threat to The Constitution.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's not just him. It's the infrastructure supporting the Nazi regime.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Do it yourself. Your people voted for it. Wether they voted for him or didnt vote. This is on your people.

Worst regards a german

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

We saved you from the Third Reich. This would be repayment?

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 49 minutes ago

Oooh there we go again the only thing you americans have, sweeping in in the last 2 years while making profit off of the war all the years before, and even being the reason for the nazis with willsons "be democratic somehow or we wont make peace", the great depression, enormouse amout of debt basicly killing the young and very fragile democracy before it began and so much more

You didnt do that alone. You came at the end. The resistance in germany, france, britain and all other occupied terretories, gave more.

The "debt" germany paid off years ago. Afghanistan, the numerouse desert wars, money we spend on the USA and we had our country destroyed thanks to the nazis.

Ww2 is all you americans know hm? Shouldnt have voted him in, he made it way clearer what his goals were than Adolf ever did

[–] Eggyhead 5 points 3 hours ago

Someone should make sure he at least knows what those words mean first.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well he's the president, so he should really get clear on that. Immediately.

[–] Thoven@lemdro.id 7 points 5 hours ago

He is clear on it, he just doesn't want to admit it

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

So the social contract is null and void.

And force is the only thing backing up power now with only resistance stopping it.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It would be hilarious if instead of asking this, the reporter asked him to define "due process"

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"Of course I know what due process is. A lot of my friends are due process experts, and they're always telling me 'Donald, you do so much process. Nobody does process as brilliantly as you.'"

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This is coming from the same administration that thought transgenic mice were transgender mice. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he actually comes out with something like this.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 9 points 15 hours ago

I noticed recently that the annotated constitution website suggests visitors to search "due process" in the search bar.

https://constitution.congress.gov/

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 203 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This comment, all by itself, is an impeachable offense. Sigh.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Can you imagine if Obama said this? Did literally any of these things?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Or Biden. Or Harris.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Many things are impeachable offenses; but nothing is convictable.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 105 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He swore an oath to the very thing he doesn't give a shit about.

The constitutional crisis happened on swearing in day.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

He swore an oath to it, TWICE!

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The person being sworn in as President by the Chief Justice that day was ineligible for office according to the 14th Amendment section 3. And he could only do that because Congress neglected its Constitutional duty to enforce that provision.

That is all three branches of the government colluding to break the Constitution to put an ineligible man into the highest office.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

All three branches ran by his sycophants, the Republicans.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

Presidents should do something, like some form of oath, to uphold this kind of things. And pass a test to ensure they understand all the complicated words.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We treat him better than any criminal and he still cries about being treated unfairly... anyone else in America would be behind bars right now.

[–] ITeeTechMonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

We even have a real life example of this with all of the January 6th convictions resulting in jail time whereas his Highness was protected by a fascist judge who stalled the court proceedings at every opportunity.

Judge Aileen Cannon needs to be removed from her position, never be allowed to hold any judicial or public office position, and charged with obstruction of justice.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Absolutely, and it also didn't help that Merrick Garland (who, let me remind you, was only nominated for SCOTUS in the first place because Obama thought he was so conservative that not even McConnell could object to him) slow-walked the case for two years to begin with.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 19 hours ago

A jury of his peers literally found him guilty of several felonies.

Upon sentencing, the judge said, "Woopsie! I guess we can't put you in prison because you're a president now. Oh well."

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

If that's not one of the first questions Monday morning from the White House Press pool they should all be fired. What other Oaths does he not know if needs to uphold? What other parts of the Constitution which he took an oath to defend and uphold does he not believe in?

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 6 points 15 hours ago

Well, as another example, he doesn't know what rhe Declaration of Independence is about. See timestamp 3:18. https://youtu.be/GBwCUPttprw

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Someone fucking murder Trump already.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

If only, if only

-The Woodpecker sighs.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 28 points 23 hours ago

Trump is just the highly visible part of a whole cancerous growth. All of the right wing, with its "outgroups to bind and in-groups to protect" worldview, needs to go.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 20 hours ago

Fun fact! Murder is "the unlawful killing of a human being with malice". If it's lawful, e.g. in self defense, it's not murder.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Asked in the interview whether U.S. citizens and noncitizens alike deserve due process as laid out in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, Trump was noncommittal.

“I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know,” Trump said when pressed by Welker.

Do you need to be a lawyer to be aware of the Bill of Rights? He's been President for more than 4 total years, head of the executive branch charged with executing the law for the entire country, has a whole staff of lawyers advising him, and has, himself, pled the 5th (!) and he's still not even familiar with the 5th amendment?

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Dementia is a path to many inconsistencies some consider to be... a big deal

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 20 hours ago

And he's sworn to uphold the Constitution (though a serial liar like him is about as trustworthy as a fox watching the chicken house)

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If any other president ... Democrat or Republican ... had come out and said the things Turnip has said over the years, they would have lost their political careers by now

The problem isn't this orange idiot, the problem is the mass of people, politicians, funders, enablers and wealthy backers who want this moron in power. Turnip is a powerless fool .... it's the people who keep him power that are the problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Just wait till it affects him personally and he will.

[–] thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It already did and he got off scot-free because of it.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In classic Conservative fashion he benefited from due process when he needed it and now he wants to remove it so others can't benefit from it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

He obviously doesn't. Which constitution defying EO led anyone to believe he gives a single fuck??

load more comments
view more: next ›