this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
927 points (97.8% liked)

Games

38452 readers
1792 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it's ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Saryn@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is insane - Pokemon cannot trademark having mounts in games. Screw Niantic, the Pokemon company and especially Nintendo which basically controls the first two. Screw them

Do not support these companies.

Sincerely, A life long Pokemon fan

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

pokemon licenses to niantac, its solely on pokemon company/nintendo.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Atlus should sue Nintendo for stealing the idea of monster collecting and storing them in your PC from Megami Tensei.

[–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yep down with these mfers

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why is there nothing in place to punish Ninendo for doing shit like this?

Patent law is rigged. Legal monopolies shouldn't exist.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Legal monopolies shouldn’t exist.

I agree IP law is messed up, but that doesn't mean the idea doesn't have merit.

Having a temporary, legal monopoly on something that requires a lot of R&D and not much production cost (say, a novel or new kind of asphalt) allows the creator to make back their R&D costs before competitors come out with cheaper alternatives. Without that protection, companies would be less likely to invest in R&D.

We need shorter durations and more scrutiny on scope. Also, patents should generally not apply to software.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (6 children)

that doesn’t mean the idea doesn’t have merit.

As an incentive structure for corporations and "people" purely motivated by avarice, sure.

Most people naturally want to create and contribute as long as their needs and most basic wants are met. A monopoly as an incentive is not necessary.

Without that protection, companies would be less likely to invest in R&D.

There are many ways to motivate corporations to do R&D outside of offering them a monopoly on a silver platter. Incentives are only one half of the equation. Its really all about leverage.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can get the pokéball, but mounts in games are older than pokémon. That one makes no sense.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

and pokemon dint even had actual mounts til much later than most consoles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

This is why I'll never feel sorry for Nintendo - karma is long overdue for this company. In fact, I'll download a switch emulator right now just to spite them.

[–] gradual 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Heck yeah.

Torzu seems to be the logical successor to Yuzu.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gradual 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (20 children)

Copyright and patent laws need to die.

Victims of Stockholm Syndrome always focus on what their abusers provide, but never what they take away.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is bullshit. Warner Brothers and Nintendo need to lose, hard.

Also, why the hell does Nintendo think they were first when it comes to the concept? Animals and gliding have been a thing for a long time.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You see, the patent system is based on a “first to file the paperwork” basis, thereby enabling literal legalized theft. Neoliberalism at work, precisely as designed.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the patent system is based on a “first to file the paperwork” basis

then blame the patent office, because it shouldn't be so

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I definitely blame the patent office.

But also, patents should not exist. They need to be completely abolished. Copyrights are one thing, copyrights make sense, patents are another entirely, existing solely to facilitate intellectual theft from both individual entities and the broader public.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I need to start patenting random game mechanics, apparently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So are they next going after unicorns that you capture?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Palworld did more for the monster-collecting genre in one early access title than Pokémon has in the last decade of AAA titles.

Why does Nintendo deserve these patents when they aren't going to produce anything meaningful with them and simply weaponize them to squash any real threatening competition?

Pokémon is the highest grossing franchise in the world, and 2nd place isn't even close. I think they can give a little ground to an indie developer who makes games that people are actually interested in playing. The patent bullshit is ridiculous.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Because that's how Nintendo works. They are the Disney of gaming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 257 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (24 children)

This lawsuit is so stupid. In my opinion, patenting, copyrighting, or trademarking concepts or mechanics in video games shouldn't be allowed at all. The nemesis system in the Shadow of Mordor games was so cool, but we're never going to see anything like it again. Warner went through the trouble to copyright (or something idk I'm not a lawyer) that system, and then let the series die out.

I'm waiting to see the headlines that any other games with a shooty thing that goes bang is illegal, and the concept of shooting a gun in a video game is going to be owned by either Rockstar/Take Two or the collective mob of Call of Duty developers. If the world is gonna get that stupid, I got my fingers crossed that Bubsy 3D owns the rights to jumping

Edit: Thought about it for 10 more seconds and I have questions. Is it specifically gliding using a creature that Nintendo has a problem with, or is it creature-assisted traversal in general? Can they sue Skyrim since you can ride horses? Palworld made the change so that you need to build a glider to glide around. BOTW and TOTK used gliders. Is Nintendo gonna sue them for that now too? I fucking hate all of this so God damned much

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'm unconvinced that the Nemesis system would have worked well in too many other settings, but one game patent that had a tangible effect on the industry was Bandai-Namco's patent on loading screen mini games. Remember how you could make the Soul Calibur II characters yell stuff while the match loaded? Funny that we didn't see it again until Street Fighter 6, isn't it? Conveniently after a patent would have expired. We went through an entire era of games with load times that could have benefited from mini games, and by the time the patent expired, we had largely come up with ways to get rid of load screens altogether.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 140 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Nintendo is just a garbage lawsuit company that sometimes makes hardware with stupid subscriptions attached.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago

Remember they amended the patent after palworld came out

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Here's hoping Pokemon and Nintendo see disappointing sales. Everytime someone brings up Pokemon, bring up Palworld and how massive of a dick the Pokemon Company/Nintendo was. When people talk about the Switch 2, they bring up all the lawsuits Nintendo brought up on fans, all the YouTubers that dealt with issues because suing people, I'd assume, is Nintendo's main income source at this point..

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago

Fuck Nintendo.

[–] Surp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Not that I matter being a single person but cya Nintendo I won't be buying anything from you ever again honestly unless its used and from someone on facebook marketplace or the likes of.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 80 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Wait i can't fly on Pals now?

Does that mean that Ark can't fly on dinosaurs?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 38 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Nintendo are rightly losing their free pass with gamers.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't care about Palworld, but I do hate Nintendo. Enemy of my enemy and all that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 117 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean... Patents in general are bullshit just for things like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›