this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
787 points (95.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

7681 readers
1721 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

I won't be able to ever shake off Harry Potter. I don't think of points and views, I just love the idea of another world to go learn magic away from tech and such. I don't read or listen to it for the political points, or whatever other trash she's hidden in there. I read it as a form of escapism.

That said, I absolutely hate Rowling. Its to the point that I'm embarrassed that I still like HP. I hate the stupid shit that pukes out her mouth and I hate that she's taken a whole fanbase down with her. I feel like, for just liking Harry Potter, I'm labeled a patriarchal fascist and that's not my stance at all. I was an innocent kid who fell in love and still uses the books as a safe place to this very day, because I took refuge in them when my mother was at her most abusive (physically and mentally).

When I was very young, I would daydream about being taken away from her to another world to just dive into magic. She would lie to my therapists and tell them I had mental issues and a vivid imagination. That it was all in my head that she abused me. No one believed me when I cried for help. I was tested for autism. I was diagnosed with severe ADHD. There was one time in elementary school where they tried to take my video game magazine from me in class and I was hysterical, screaming that the demons in my head were going to get me. They blamed the magazine material (Mortal Kombat with Baraka on the front cover, I actually still have it). I was treated as though I was crazy.

It was pure, mind-altering hell. She won every court case over my father on the mere fact that she was my mother. She tried to have me put on numerous drugs as a kid, but my father refused and they needed both parent's consent. So that's why I'm irrationally addicted to the books. I'm not so vulnerable as to have my moral views swayed by a fictional story. However, Rowling will never get another cent from me if I can help it. My audiobooks are already pirated as is. I just wish I could be more honest about loving the books without having to tell this story and not be regarded as a piece of shit for liking them.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

She is further proof that wealth makes people insane and that's why extreme wealth should be VIOLENTLY abolished.

US Billionaires have a literal god complex and are openly trying to destroy society an install an aristocracy, removing ALL civil rights from society.

The wealthy all have to be killed. There is no other reasonable solution.

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Fascist shitgoblins don't far fall from each other off the same branch.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

It's kind of too late now, though. Even if we somehow convinced every person on earth to never buy another Harry Potter anything ever again. She's already got her bag. That won't go away and she'd continue being a horrible person with the power of wealth.

Elon's wealth, on the other hand, exists almost entirely as a fiction of his businesses' value. He is much more susceptible to being taken down with them.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

She became the villain from her own book: Voldermort.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I never understood all this whinging about J. K. Rowling. I was a big fan of Ender's Game when I was younger, but when Orson Scott Card revealed himself to be an asshole I dropped those books like a bad habit and everyone I knew did the same. There wasn't even really any debate over it. Why are we still wringing our hands about Harry Potter?

[–] brognak@lemm.ee 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Enders Game (and the whole series) is a bit different, as unlike Harry Potter they are actually trying to teach a lesson in empathy and understanding instead of just being a fun magical romp.

To this day I have literally no idea how the Orson who wrote those books became the man he did. He lives his life by the antithesis of the ideals he preached.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

He had a stroke in 2011, and I think having two kids die fucked him up. (Some of his early works had sympathetic portrayals of gay men.)

I’ve always found it amusing that the guy who wrote Wyrms (fourteen year old girl is destined to be impregnated by a monster, and the book is her weird horny journey to it) and Hart’s Hope (where our hero has to rape a teenage girl in front of an audience in order to claim sovereignty over the kingdom, and she turns into the story’s main villain) got so hung up about sexual purity.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

they are actually trying to teach a lesson in empathy

S.P.E.W. and mugblood rhetoric seem like progressive topics with real world analogues.

Her transphobic politics seem to be separate from the HP universe.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The point of S.P.E.W. is that Hermoine is an obnoxious activist for caring about slavery so much. Winky gets freed and becomes a depressed alcoholic, the other house elves get pissed that Hermoine tries to give them homemade socks. Hagrid calls Dobby weird for not wanting to be a slave.

Pottermore used to have an article “To SPEW or not to SPEW” which was critical of Hermoine. The text clearly condones the race based slavery. Heck - even the name “SPEW” is a joke.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I never considered that Rowling was making fun of Hermoine's Elf position.

But I did think it strange that a nicely set-up elf rebellion never arrived.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

They’ve tried their best to wipe this article off the internet:

The trouble with S.P.E.W. is that Hermione wants it all and wants it now. Political movements take time as well as effort, so the notion of changing the world overnight is quite naive. Even when people are well-meaning, there’s always the risk of doing more harm than good.

Hermione’s methods might be ill-advised, but this doesn’t render her entire cause unworthy. Just because most elves don’t want freedom doesn’t mean they don’t deserve better treatment. Hermione’s dream of an elf in government might be far-fetched, but there’s merit in wanting to protect the vulnerable and allow them more choices. However, she ought to be careful – ‘tricking’ elves into freedom is arguably as unethical as enslavement.

Before we go, let’s consider Kreacher. Think of how he changed when treated with kindness by his new master, Harry Potter. Previously he’d been bitter and unpleasant, not to mention a liability to his previous owner. Had Sirius treated him a little better, things might have worked out differently. Dumbledore was right – being kind to Kreacher was in everyone’s best interests.

If you look at other translations, “SPEW” is often changed to that language’s word for “vomit,” “fart,” or “snot.”

The idea that Dobby is mentally unwell for wanting to be free has some upsetting historical precedent.

The only person responsible for the written content seems to be Rowling. And her key witness is Hagrid who is not portrayed for his intelligence in the books.

This is not good for Rowling, but I think kids would still read the HP series and take Hermoine's point of view.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

Because it became a multimedia franchise and fans still want to keep consuming it despite how much she sucks, so there's a lot of mental gymnastics.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 hours ago

best I can do on Rowling is look forward to the inevitable Behind the Bastards coverage

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 23 points 11 hours ago

"Influencing" is putting it mildly. Funding organizations with political power is a lot more than that.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Also it’s not just a trans thing.

JK is incredibly ableist and regularly mocks disabled people. For example one of her latest books is basically painting all chronically ill people as malingerers.

[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

And one of her more recent blow-ups was against asexual people.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's in her HP books. The editor just tampered it down, but you can still see it now that we have a pattern. It's why I hate the people who say, "hate the artist, but love the art" bullshit. The art is bad as well and I'm proud I bailed on that series half way though.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I like the comparison of Harry Potter to Lord of the Rings that points out Harry Potter was a very special, perhaps ethnically special boy, who deserved his powers because he was naturally good, while Frodo Baggins was a dude who got saddled with an absurd level of responsibility, which he never could have handled without a long list of friends and randos who found it amusing to help him.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (2 children)

If it was just Harry, it would just be an over used clique, but ethnic or birth traits kept coming up. Hagrid is naturally angry. Voldemort is evil because he was a rape baby. House Elves are natural ~~slaves~~servants. The Weasley family will always be poor(even when Harry should be paying rent or at least buying them a new car).

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Voldemort is evil because he was a rape baby.

As a sorta half blood rape baby, this has always driven me mad. I am not evil because my conception was.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

well that is more Harry Potter information than I previously had, but I'll just move on and pretend to be dumber than I am, which is already pretty bad. when I was kid I gathered an embarassing amount of knowledge on Stephen King novels. I didn't really expect him to be one of the good guys in 2025, but there he is.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I gave up on HP half way through, but because the topic kept coming up so when I saw what looked like a good review everything on yt, I put it on in the back ground.

Oh, right. The Irish character kept blowing things up.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

well I just get more and more impressed with Rowling the more I learn

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

"These people aren't fucking exactly the right amount."

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

You would think that of all the non-heteosexual sexualities that asexual people would be the least likely for someone to be prejudice against. I understand that asexuality is a spectrum and any generalization about any large group of people lacks accuracy but, generally I've found aces just want to be left alone. Something I think we can all appreciate every now and again. They're just not interested in romantic and/or sexual relationships. The first decade of my life was like that, I think the first decade of most people's lives are like that. What's so hard to understand about people who just don't feel that attraction?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›