A human christian women let their newborn baby to die in the forest while her and her family fucked off to an impromptu trip. The baby was only found thanks to the dog barking and trying to bring attention to it.
this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
563 points (98.3% liked)
Microblog Memes
7690 readers
2117 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If the first statement were true then Adam and Eve did not sin because they literally did not know right from wrong until eating the literal fruit of the knowledge of food and evil.
They literally didn’t exist. It’s a story made up by people to scare children.
It's a weird story though because the moral seems to be that even adults don't do what they're told. And sometimes your sister is hot.
Alternate take if you’re into it: “Sin” only exists in our mind, once we perceive it we create it. Naivety truly is bliss, knowledge is a curse.
But having knowledge also means you know how to do drugs and neat ways of fucking, so … win some lose some.
They were literally told what they were allowed and not allowed to do before they ate that fruit.
They literally did not know what they were doing was evil because they literally did not know right from wrong.
Yes, but they didn't understand that not following God's orders was bad. They weren't capable of making moral decisions because they hadn't eaten the fruit yet.
If you follow the story, it’s apparent that the end was engineered. And that the real villain was not the snake or adam nor eve but god itself
The serpent is a Promethean figure and is forever disfigured because of it.
Cats do nothing but sin because they have no soul.
here's an insult I think belongs here:
"unlike AI music, this song has a soul. And that soul deserves to go to hell."
I don't think cars should go to hell though
Cars?
Autocorrect loves changing cat to car for some reason.
cat: stares intently at the growling human while slowly pushing the mug off the table
Cat: I'm bored. Let's see if I can get the hairless ape 20x my size off the couch. Ooh! I bet they can't get over here before this hits the ground.
:: gently pawing ceramic figurine sounds ::
After years of training to know what the word ‘No’ command means.
Years of training the human by playing stupid you mean.
It doesn't take years of training, they just don't care.
Oh, they do care. That's why they do it.
This isn't right or wrong; it's a guaranteed reaction.
Yeah it's bullshit. Pro-social animals like dogs, primates, elephants understand group norms and social expectations e.g. appeasement behaviour. Its probably how our own "morality" developed as a species.
And there's evidence to suggest some species like dolphins absolutely do exhibit moral type behaviour like fairness and cooperation.
Your examples, and honestly calling it bullshit, operate under your human understanding of right and wrong.
Me, a homo sapiens, belonging to the animal kingdom
This homo bragging about being a kween. Work, bitch! 💅
By this logic psychopaths do not sin.
Explains why so many of them own Megachurches
Right and wrong is one thing, sin is another. Sin is doing stuff that God says not to do, morality doesn't really come into it. Cats can't sin because they don't have theistic religion.
Defying an authority figure is not a sin. What if it tells you to do something bad, like slit your sons throat and burn the body? Defining sin as questioning authority is BS.
That is precisely what differentiates sin from evil. It's why we have two words for those two things. Abraham would not have sinned by killing Isaac as ordered. But it would have been an evil act, and stupid and insane
Cats are their own gods. Letting them see the bottom of their food bowl is a mortal sin and you will burn in kitty hell for it.
Animals can't be evil. Period.
Evil is a human definition. I'm sure there have been tigers/bears/sharks/hippies that have gone on killing sprees that have been defined by humans as evil, though they were working well within their own natural framework of aggression.
*I meant hippoes, not hippies, but the statement stands.
Human trait only, sorry.
Yeah, bullshit.
Ceo of black Rock is evil, where's an animal comparison??
Homo Sapiens, subfamiliy homininae, suborder Haplorhini, is a animal too.
Btw, chimpanzee wage war and crows bully in groups.
War and bullying isn't evil look up the ceo of black rock
Humans aren't animals you facetious dipshit
Look, if you have a good reason why humans aren't animals, i'm happy to learn that.
No need to get all personal.
Cats are definitely evil. Adorably so, sure, yet evil nonetheless.
Dolphins, too. Cruel, rapey bastards, the lot of them. Orcas in particular probably enjoy killing and hurting their prey almost as much as cats.
Most birds are evil in a stupid birdbrained sort of way, even the smart ones. Should've gone extinct sixty-five million years ago with the rest of the dinosaurs, the bastards.
Chimpanzees are almost as creepily evil as humans (not bonobos, though; they just want to get along and fuck as much as possible).
And then there's us.
The ceo of black Rock is evil, cats aren't on the same page..