this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
1080 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

71223 readers
4054 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

I disagree.

  1. You already have a government space agency. Maybe give them more funding so they don't have to rely on space-x to get their stuff into orbit?

  2. There's a national telecom network already in place. It at least has the potential to be faster and more reliable, if it isn't already... At least compared to low earth orbit satellite coverage.

There's no good reason to continue providing Elon or his companies with any government handouts. Pull that funding and give it to.... I dunno, students who have more debt than homeowners with a mortgage..... NASA.... Literally anything that helps people?

[–] hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Starlink should be globalized. A planet only needs one low-altitude orbiting communications network. Better to standardize the technology and platform and let them contribute to one system than to have a dozen identical competing systems crashing into each other and fucking things up for everyone.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Ah. My Kessler syndrome is acting up again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You have NASA FFS. Just fund it.

load more comments (3 replies)

No, we should regain control of our nation from fascists (this does not mean just replace the President), then nationalize SpaceX and Starlink, and make telecoms public utilities.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A lot of people are calling this a bailout for Elon, but in reality it would be a seizure. Elon doesn't want to let go of Starlink and the US likely wouldn't pay him what it's worth to take it over.

What people seem to be missing is the precedent this would set. It's all well and good when we empower the office of the president to seize a private company we don't like, but after we give them that power what's to stop them from seizing other businesses?

XYZ company refuses to get rid of their DEI policy because the shareholders voted to keep it? Well now the orange man can seize it.

Let's not forget that previously it took 2/3rd majority to confirm presidential appointments, but the Senate under Obama decided to change that rule to 50% to get past Republican objections. The result of this is all these shit appointments Trump has passed with 51% of the Senate, none of them would have gotten by if the Democrats hadn't made a precedent for changing the rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't give bail-outs to billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBannedLemming@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am not saying that I don't agree with you. But this country is still not even close to considering nationalizing its own telecommunication infrastructure. Much less a privately held space company and a service of communication satellites. A large chunk of America believes that a for-profit business model for every good and service possible in life is the best course of action.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nasa with less risk aversion. If a Nasa rocket blows up that's big news. If a Space X rocket blows up, that's a Tuesday.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (14 children)

We should just fund NASA and let SpaceX and Starlink go bankrupt to competitors.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] frenchfryenjoyer 6 points 2 days ago

There's already NASA which gets piss poor funding iirc

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Arrest Musk on violation of controlled substances acts, file immigration violation charges, invalidate his ownership shares due to securities fraud, as he falsified education and naturalization forms.

Or just emminent domain the shit. The Law is just made up right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 100 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Has anyone considered funding NASA?

They made rockets that didn't explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 298 points 3 days ago (39 children)

Yeah I mean the tax payers have literally already paid for all of both SpaceX and Starlink. The public paid for it, the public should own it.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 75 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Yeah, let's give the trump administration the power to seize companies it doesn't like, that is a great idea that def won't be abused all the time

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 142 points 3 days ago (72 children)

You could always just fund the space agency you already have, instead of funneling money to a foreign billionaire.

load more comments (72 replies)
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Best time would've been when he pulled that stunt in Ukraine, second best time is now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›