this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
142 points (94.9% liked)

Not The Onion

17000 readers
921 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trimatrix@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

By no means is having 106 children normal or sane. But now I have a legit answer when someone says, “Why would anyone need $1 Billion.” I can now say, “So each of my 100 kids can get $10Million in inheritance money.”

10mil is still “set for life” territory just with an added debuff of, “If managed and invested carefully”

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Geneticists in a thousand years are going to have questions about a sudden boom in certain gene markers around this time if they don't have the added context of billionaires deciding they're the master race by virtue of being billionaires.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't be the first time... Didn't the same shit happen with Genghis Khan?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Actually works out to 160m per kid. So if they make meh investments like putting it all in U.S. bonds, they can get about 7 million in interest to live off of every year.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Clickbait article. Overwhelming majority of his children are from sperm donation. Not many people would split their inheritance that way so that's good. There are far far shittier parents. I'm Not saying that he's a saint!

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or we could just tax 100 freaking percent of this and use it to benefit much, much more than just 100 people? 😁 No one should have this much power.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I like your idea.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So if one of his offspring were to kill another one of his offspring the murdering offspring's share goes up (along with all the other surviving offspring)? This sounds like a dangerous announcement.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In fairness, offing someone means your share goes up less than 1%, making the risk-reward for murder math out beneficial for everyone.

However, if that 17 billion was split between two or three children, we might have the beginning of an Agatha Christie novel.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Totally a number worthy of murder. It's happened for much less

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That would be split between 105 people. So it's really, you get 160 million or 161.6 million with a chance of life in prison.

Just put the money in a savings account with at least 1% interest and you'll make the extra in the first year

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

In fairness, offing someone means your share goes up less than 1%, making the risk-reward for murder math out beneficial for everyone.

Less than 1% (106 kids), so each share would be $160m each. However, if the murdering offspring has crossed the line into murder, why stop at just one murder? A single murder would net each surviving offspring an extra $1.5M. This also assumes there is only one murdering offspring. As soon as the first murder occurs there might be a second or third copycat murderer. With only 90 surviving offspring each survivor is getting a cool $188m each.

However, if that 17 billion was split between two or three children, we might have the beginning of an Agatha Christie novel.

Maybe not an Agatha Christie book, but the interesting novel would arrive where in the story one of the offspring figures out this math, and identifies common locations where more than one offspring would be at one time. So a single incident would net them multiple hits, and be hidden from obvious intent.

"Tonight, sadness grips the city as the roof of the Claridon Center Arena fell in during the sold out concert. At this hour officials confirm 37 dead as the search for survivors continues. No cause has been reported for the roof failure yet."

"A city bus was engulfed in flames when a stolen fuel tank truck collided with it at high speeds. There were no survivors on the bus carrying 42 people. Curiously, the tank truck driver escaped unharmed at is being sought by police even now for questioning."

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

It's like Highlander

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Don't feel bad about it.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, can we get the facts straight OP?

Is it $17 billion or $117 billion?

The article says $17 billion, but you typed $117 billion in the post body...

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pavel Durov, 40, told the French outlet Le Point in an interview about his decision to allocate his fortune. He's worth about $17.1 billion, per Forbes.

The headline is correct, according to the article. Must have just been an oversight.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I searched the text of the article for 117, zero results found.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah. It's an oversight in the SEO summary. That wasn't me.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ah, gotcha.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So if he has two more, do we have a cast for the next Suikoden?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

But none of them are cute anime kids. Zero stars, do not recommend.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Crikey.

Elon better get pumping. His legion pales in comparison.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So... the most standard thing ever?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not anymore.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That I'm aware of...

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

What a gross fucker

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's not even a billion per shitty child. Fuckin' douche

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

Come on now, it's not like he's made of money.

Tap for spoiler

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you calling the children 'shitty'?

It's just my guess that the children will turn out shitty or are currently shitty