646
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 126 points 11 months ago

Wasn't the 100 tampons thing because they didn't know how weightlessness would affect bleeding?

[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 218 points 11 months ago

That and NASA is a very safety conscious organization. So they want to overestimate everything and include way more than they need. So when she said a couple per day you can round that to 5 for safety, then considering it's a 6 day mission they want to include triple the amount of needed supplies which means 18 days worth. 18*5=90 which is pretty close to 100 so let's round up again. Plus tampons are a useful first aid tool, especially in zero gravity. You shove some into an open wound and it'll prevent blood from spilling all over the very sensitive equipment. Does a woman need 100 tampons for 6 days? Of course not, but she wasn't going to spend a week in the mountains, she was going to space, so the safety precautions were much more stringent

[-] _danny@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

It's also a weight thing. Tampons are pretty light, it's like one hundred per pound, so they probably said "we can budget x pounds for this" and didn't think much about the reasoning behind why they're sending several hundred tampons into space, but we're entirely focused on how.

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 18 points 11 months ago

Less than that I think, and I’d suspect NASA would do load calculations in metric.

According to this reputable (first result on Google) High School Science Fair Project ^PDF, the average tampon is about 1g. I wouldn’t be surprised if they just budgeted 100g for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 33 points 11 months ago

Just a word of advice, the tampon in a wound thing, as much as the Russian military might advise it, is not good medical technique. Do not use a tampon to plug a wound. It'll likely do more harm than good. Just apply pressure to it from the outside with your hand if you have literally no other option.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

Agree in general. The problem would be debris trapping, fluid compartmenting, sterility, etc.

But if you need a dressing and that's all you have, unpacking them into gauze pad like things would be great.

All of this assuming you are literally flying 7.5km/s towards a trauma center

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 months ago

I learned recently that in space you might not need to piss as the piss floats in your bladder.

normally you get 3/4s full and really need a slash, but in space it can fill up totally without you feeling anything and then just bust out your urethra without notice.

honestly, it was probably a fair point.

[-] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago

Your bladder changes volume to hold urine; there's no floating, just pressure. Gravity affects that pressure though.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

NASA also does everything they can to save weight though.

On later Apollo missions, they cut the number of band-aids in the lunar lander's first aid kit from 6 to 12 to save weight.

[-] NotMaster@lemmynsfw.com 41 points 11 months ago

Doubled the bandaids to save weight. I can see why the tampon thing was a struggle for them.

[-] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

They're to replace the tampons

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

they cut the number of band-aids in the lunar lander's first aid kit from 6 to 12 to save weight.

I see here is the problem. The guy doesn't know how to reduce weight, you don't add more stuff to cut on weight. That explains the extra tampons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jabbermuggel@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago

Not that I disagree that NASA isn't safety conscious, but I've recently watched a video about the challenge disaster which seemingly could easily have been avoided if they had listened to the weather concerns or redesigned their solid boosters after issues were observed in the first place. I guess in that case they just got too complacent.

[-] aido@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

That decision was made on a different level, though, and was largely political.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 64 points 11 months ago

NASA is obsessed with redundancy, especially when the weight allowance lets them run away with it.

Add that to the fact that most of the engineers were men, and had literally no clue about how many tampons are needed for a normal woman on earth, and you end up with 100 being sent up for a two-week mission.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 30 points 11 months ago

Do people really use the term "hosting" when saying you're having someone over for the weekend? Because I'm getting sex worker vibes otherwise.

[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 50 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sure. In my mind, hosting is either for larger get-together that takes organizing and preparation or if someone is traveling to the area to stay with you for a few days.

Hosting generally carries the weight of planning, organization and preparation that probably doesn’t go into just having someone over to hang out.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

Depends how grown-up we're trying to feel

[-] TheWanderer@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

Been using that forever, even in the internet. Ever heard of LAN hosting?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago

I don't hear it often, but being a host to people in your house is a normal thing.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

I feel like we're missing an important piece of the puzzle: are they an alcoholic?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pigup@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago
[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

What would be the normal amount, just out of interest?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I tried too long to figure out what this has to do with the Lemmy app.

*lemme

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Breweries already did the math for us - 1 case per dude.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
646 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5162 readers
1902 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS