this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
161 points (95.5% liked)

Games

40744 readers
1579 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disco@lemdro.id 12 points 5 hours ago

It's almost like if I'm constantly fed slop I avoid it

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's part of it for sure. It's grimdark. Read: boring.

Forever locked in a Jedi vs Sith binary. And it is the highest of heresy to dare imagine anything beyond it.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

All they have to do is get the same guys that did the trailers for KoTOR and they'd see very good things come out of it. They're just trying to milk it every way they can so that they can hold on to something now that they're losing all their OG IPs to public domain.

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No it's because it was shite,poorly written and lousy with weird polical shit and terrble gameplay.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

star wars is inherently a political franchise

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Difference between analogies to real or fictional politics.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 16 points 14 hours ago

Disney killed the franchise by releasing slop year after year. Also by letting Ubisoft make a Star Wars game.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 14 hours ago

Star wars should be in the public domain by now

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Could it be waning interest in the Ubislop formula?

No, it's the gamers who are wrong!

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t even hate the Ubisoft formula, but it’s, like, dawg…. Try something new. I go years without being interested in the schlog, then I get really into one. But it’s astounding that they’re still putting out the same game for over a decade now. The trimmings might be a little spruced and fluffed here and there but the core loop is still the same fucking game, again and again and again.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I played AC Odyssey and the DLC a while back, and I'm still burnt out on Assassin's Creed about 4 years later.

It just seems designed to sap as much of your time as possible. Like an MMO but without any tangible benefit for them doing so.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And then they have the balls to sell items in game that speed up the gameplay.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

I was level capped before I even touched the DLC. I ignored everything that was generated rather than having some story to it. There's just a lot of game there. Too much, in fact.

I just don't know who the funbucks shop is even for. It's not like you can even show it off online because it's single player...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 14 hours ago

Wasn't it more that the game was a buggy mess? No that can't have been it it was clearly the fans fault.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 31 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

A) And yet, not long after, Andor was massively successful.

B) Then stop making games exclusively based off of third party IPs.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 31 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Waning interest in Ubisoft. Everything they touch is painfully generic and uninteresting. On top of that, they infect the games with Denuvo malware while charging top dollar. But sure, blame the consumers for your lack of vision, passion, business sense, and technical acumen. See how that pays off, Yves.

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

It's really sad. I truly believe that Yves (or rather the Guillemots in general) were passionate about game development once. Now it feels mostly corporate, even though they still claim to be pro-gamer and innovative and fun. It's double sad because they acquired quite some good studios that have to be shaped into their corp structure and ultimately lose their innovation. It's not as bad as old-school EA, but it's still subjectively bad.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 186 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

these arrogant assholes.

just like movies and TV, the waning interest in the franchise is only because you keep making shitty games with it.

If you people start making GOOD star wars stuff again, we WILL eat it up.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Andor is an example of excellent Star Wars content that people want to see. They just produced crap.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally I'm pretty tired of Star wars, every entertainment product doesn't need to belong to a Disney franchise

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Same, all the Star Wars slop Disney has churned out has completely washed any lingering magic out of the fabric of the franchise for me. I don't even feel the desire to watch supposedly good Star Wars products like Andor these days.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] enkonju@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought the game looked ok, but why would I pay $70 for a game that can disappear from my library whenever Ubisoft feels like it? They've demonstrated that they're willing to permanently take games away from paying customers, so I'm not willing to spend more than the cost of a rental on one of their games.

And that's the exact feeling I've had. So eloquently said. Thank you. 💯

If they sell me a product that i can't forever keep, then I've been renting the whole time.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The game looked quite generic to me. As someone who's not deep into Star Wars, the titular character looked more like 70s mom than space adventure. And the gameplay also looked like they just slapped yet another texture pack onto something I've seen a thousand times already.

So, I don't see why you'd buy this game in particular, unless you do a lot of gaming or a lot of Star Wars. I imagine, they missed out on most sales towards the more casual crowd.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

It feels like they tried to make a PG/kids version of Red Dead Redemption with aliens, poorly written characters and a glitch-infested game engine as cheap as legally possible without being called slave labor.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

titular character looked more like 70s mom than space adventure

So more like star wars inlaws than outlaws?

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Not waning interest in Ubisoft?

Because, ooh boy, did my interest in Ubisoft wane year after year of overproduced cookie cutter crap. And I'm not expecting a change of phase.

Also, Guillemot, you're talking publicly a lot for someone with (now convicted) sexual harrasser friends you've protected all of your career.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, like beating a dead horse, it has no giddy-up and go. What the hell were they thinking when they decided to do Star Wars Outlaws?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Liome@pawb.social 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is waning interest in Star Wars franchise. And Assassin's Creed franchise. And Far Cry Franchise. Hmmm, there seems to be a pattern here...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

If they would've stuck with the old 'gritty' Star Wars game that was supposed to be like GTA style adult oriented Star Wars instead of this stupid shit. It would have been massively successful.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It just boggles my mind how execs can learn the wrong lesson 100% of the time. It seems impossible.

Regardless, they keep canning games like 1313 that get fans hyped and give us generic trash instead.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, he 100% knows the truth. He just can't say it since admitting it's Ubisoft's fault would lower investor confidence (and therefore affect his personal wealth). This is the standard "blame our failures on market forces outside our control" move that all CEOs of publicly-traded are forced to do.

The stock market was a mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I tried it in May/June and it was very meh. At the start I had an urge to play it, but after a day or two I had no urge to open it. A lot of it felt repetitive to a point of why bother.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Idk, I liked Jedi: Survivor even though that one was EA.

This statement in the same week as Yves installs his son as Co-CEO in charge of their biggest franchises. A man who entered the industry as a CEO of a mobile company and then founded a AI/NFT/crypto game company that is being liquidated now.

Pure nepotism. The Guillemont family is the parasite that is killing Ubisoft.

[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love Star Wars and usually have a half decent time with Ubi games. You can usually pick them up for 50% off physical like a month after release.

I have never put down a game quicker than Outlaws. It’s Ubisoft open world map icon slop at its worst. The first 4 hours of story are boring and repetitive. Every mission was “sneak into an Imperial base, oh shit something went wrong! Now escape!” Progression and abilities might as well not be there.

Interest in SW isn’t waning. Companies keep making bad SW content.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›