this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
1057 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8794 readers
2857 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Scotland stopped voting Labour into power over a decade ago. If only England had the balls to do it too. Torys and Labour, two sides of the same corrupt coin. Come England, youre better than that. Starmer is a tory cunt. Vote greens, or Libdems, or anyone else buy those two corrupt scum parties.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~Labour~~ Starmer is just warming shitface Nigel's seat at this point

[–] nouben@lemmy.ml 135 points 2 days ago (2 children)

On france, we currently have one with 2.1M signatures, gov still said nope (petition against reintroduction of dangerous pesticide, backed by sciencists community)

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Don't you guys have a more effective way of convincing the government?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Milk poured all over the streets of Paris worked well for the dairy farmers to the best of my knowledge. Imagine the fucking smell two days later.

The French are first class protesters.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 29 points 1 day ago

The problem being that the farmers are usually protesting for pesticide.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yellow vests, Citroëns on fire, Guillotines

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 22 points 1 day ago

Citroëns on fire

A fine tradition

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no legal binding whatsoever?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It compells the government to talk about it.
That's it.

"so what shall we do about that petition then?"
"tell them to shove it?"
"great ! Good work everyone, let's have lunch."

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 94 points 2 days ago
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 69 points 2 days ago (19 children)

I signed the petition but I had zero belief it would actually result in anything.

We don't actually live in a democracy, that's just something they tell us while they do whatever the bloody hell they want.

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

reminds me of my philosophy teacher arguing against someone because my teacher said that we don't live in a democracy, but a lot of people disagreed.

i still remember the look of disapointment in their face, since they had just told us the definition of democracy😭

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love people who say "we don't live in a democracy because we live in a republic." Yeah, we don't live in a republic either, bitch.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

A republic has a specific definition but we absolutely do not meet.

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i understand thinking you live in a democracy, but i've never heard people saying it's a republic 💀

They got it from American conservatives. Love idiot to idiot communication like this, two dumbass groups separated by an ocean using the same phrase incorrectly in different ways.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile Nigel Farage is just racking up these own goals while getting ready to sell the whole country in three years time.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Crossing my fingers for the Corbyn party...

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

More like "This is good thing, please vote."

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The purpose of online petitions is to provide a means for people to psychologically discharge their righteous anger at something and need to be heard about it, by "doing something", with a "something" which the politicians can safelly ignore.

It's a lot harder to ignore large demonstrations and even harder to ignore people activelly campaigning at the grassroots level in their electoral circles to make specific asshole politicians loose their seats, so best have the ~~plebes~~ citizens discharge their anger on some automated online straight-to-trash People's Will recorder.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait until you hear about protests

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just don't inconvenience anyone in any way.

Being slightly irritating is a terrorist activity now.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Also if you get too much attention you're hurting your own message

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Pretty much - we all put our names to them, but they do nothing.

The best option is to organise writing campaigns to your local MP and indicate that this is the decider on your vote.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I mean 122,000 out of 60 million isn’t a lot.

Could likely get 5 million to say banning people based on colour is a good idea, but I don’t agree.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only need 500 (out of 40mil) + one MP sign off for the government to legally have to respond in Canada. They don't have to say yes but they have to officially acknowledge you at least. I was pretty surprised by how low that threshold is.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago

It's only like 10k here too, but the response is always "we have no plans to change anything"

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Petition

Bad thing please

Government responded

Yes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

The petition to reverse Brexit got something like 4 million signatures. Response: LOL No.

Brexit it's referendum because the Tories were scared of loosing power to Frog Face Faeage's party. So they did a bit of appeasement.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That just proves the point. The politicians will do what serves them best, regardless of what's good for the people or the country.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's very true. But they'll do the bad thing it even if there's a referendum on it.

[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because there is nothing legally binding about petitions.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 32 points 2 days ago (15 children)

If petitions (= begging) are the highest level of what people can do between two elections, something about the system is fundamentally broken.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well it does atleast force them to make a public opinion on it, it’s a foot in the door.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Which would be useful if they were also forced to actually provide a somewhat science based line of reasoning for their answer. But in reality its gonna be completely made up reasons not based on any facts.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This image is a great reflection of the entire history of the UK, incidentally.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›