this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
281 points (91.9% liked)

politics

25300 readers
3138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state's congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year.

The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

Ah yes, Democrats shooting themselves in the foot again right on schedule, fantastic...

[–] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

If we got to rank choice vote, I would absolutely put Newsom in above every current potential republican candidate, but the list above his name would also be quite long.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

I'd usually always vote dem, but I won't vote for this one. Mostly for transphobic statements, but he's actually kinda trumpy too

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It might be a less popular opinion, but I’m really hopeful that Tim Walz gets the nod. He’s actually a human as opposed to a politician.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

He won't, they don't have any dirt on him

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Gross.

I knew after the 2nd day of Newsom dick riding on reddit that this is what the democrats will shove down voters throats when the time comes.

What would the democratic party do if they didnt have the republicans to use as a cudgel against thier voters?

The blue conservatives in this comment section are suffering from a terminal case of Stockholm syndrome.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

The new poll, conducted by Echelon Insights, has Newsom in second place among potential Democratic candidates with 13 percent support, behind former Vice President Kamala Harris with 26 percent.

The number one spot right now is the woman who lost the last election, while number two is the guy who's been in the news lately. This is basically just measuring name recognition. It's more than 3 years until the election, a frontrunner is meaningless at this point.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 8 hours ago
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Disgusting how people want to support someone who is pro-corporate and betrays trans rights.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Our country elected a pedophile rapist, nothing should be at all surprising anymore.

Capital has ruined our lands and destroyed our humanity collectively. This is it, this is our kingdom after we threw money at every new shiny bullshit toy and trend and convenience until we fed No-Face until he started digesting our very morals and ethics. (Pssst, that scene was a metaphor.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So we just go back to the rich getting more welfare?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Americans are so fucking dumb oh my god

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Newsom Fetterman 2028. That's sure to fix things right up.

[–] kerntucky@infosec.pub 2 points 5 hours ago

OMG no. I can see that actually happening.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I swear US Democrats learn absolutely nothing. All you have to do is jingle some keys in their faces and they'll applaud.

This is a guy who wants California Cities to force homeless people to move every 3 days. This is a guy who has threatened to cut funding to cities that don't "crack down" on homeless people.

This is a guy who simply has one of his interns to write funny twitter posts and NOW he's suddenly "presidential material".

And some people honestly wonder how Trump was re-elected.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

There are no other options to choose from if we want aggressive responses that the bullies in charge will respect and respond to. Newstrom is it. Perfect being the enemy of good is the typical democrat excuse to sit on hands and do nothing.

Maybe the democratic party can realize what makes the people jump and put a better person in charge of that particular weapon, but that's not going to happen because the democratic party has no leader at all. I've worked in departments that didn't have a manager and there was a long gap before one was appointed, people tend to just continue doing what they were doing while they had a manager, and if anything changes it isn't their problem and eventually the entire process breaks down to a bunch of people drinking coffee and arguing about who should be doing what.

load more comments
view more: next ›