this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
919 points (99.7% liked)

196

4207 readers
2095 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://infosec.exchange/users/isotopp/statuses/115059833470035521

TranscriptAge Verification

Due to applicable UK laws, websites must verify the age of visitors using official ID to confirm they are at least 18 years old. We are a small site and unfortunately do not have the resources to implement such a system, so we are unable to serve users in the UK.

We are not required to verify your location, so please confirm below:

[I am not in the UK] [I am in the UK]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they have no infrastructure or legal presence in the UK they are not required to do shit. The UK can block them but that's about it.

The UK does not have extraterritorial jurisdiction! Whatever stupid shit they do on their shitty little island does not affect foreign firms that do not operate there.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

kinda… if you never plan on visiting the UK or any country with extradition agreements with the UK, sure… not sure exactly how extradition works, but if you ever come to a country and have big fines etc pending then they can do whatever they want

if you were like.. the CEO of reddit or something, and just chose to forgo ad revenue etc from the UK but still remain operational, i’m pretty sure they’d be able to get you

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 276 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Frankly this is a comically brilliant and absolutely outstanding example of engineering malicious compliance

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 98 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Sadly, will not actually be sufficient. They put the full burden of this shit on the site owner, all of it, without exception.

You could host in a country like Cameroon, they won't give a shit and EU won't bother going after them. They could geoblock the whole country however.

[–] NoPanko@feddit.uk 59 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Meh you just say “we don’t serve users from your country, we are not bound by your laws. users from the UK are breaking our tos”

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

that’s not super convincing though… just like TOS isn’t a protection for murder and other serious crimes, it can’t protect against all things. i’m not sure how the law is worded, but it’s not quite so cut and dry

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They could geoblock the whole country however.

The Great Firewall of TERF Island

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

we can compromise and just firewall jk rowlings house

Would the firewall replace her mold wall?

[–] MagicianWithABadPlan@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's pretty sufficient. I'm not British, I don't sell products in Britain, I do not have British assets, and I'm compliant with all American laws. They can levy all of the fines they want but I'm not obligated to care.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

unless you ever want to visit the UK

of course if you don’t ever want to, that’s fine… or if you’re small enough to fly under the radar

but just because you have no presence doesn’t mean you’ll never have any presence

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 10 points 1 day ago

UK left the EU, so the EU won't be doing anything regardless of your host country.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

UK has been on a killing small businesses streak since Brexit

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

That's because the UK is no longer a nation of shopkeepers. It is a nation of serfs for US corporations.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

EU is doing the same. A similar law was accepted in EU parliament this summer.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 96 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Appropriate that being in the UK is the negative option here

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes perfect sense, it's a proceed/go back option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 155 points 2 days ago (10 children)

physically im in the uk mentally im literally anywhere else

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

this would be great because according to kerli estonia is made of ice cream mountains and chocolate skies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Based small business

[–] schema@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I recently looked through the requirements on Ofcom's website, and to me it sounded like every email service falls well into their "user to user communication" category, which would have to "assess the risks". It's not really different than communicating in an internet forum, except it's not public, but that's not really a factor i think. Sending porn via email is probably as old as email itself.

Email providers cant moderate their users' mails (i mean they could try, but that would likely be the end of them for the obvious breach in privacy). And having people have to age-verify for an email account would be ludicrous, especially considering children need emails for school, etc.

I wonder if they ever clarified anything about email services and how they would or would not be affected by this bullshit law.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can get porn in a google image search, even in the UK. No ID or login required. I did see a comment about it not applying to search engines, which really does make you wonder what is the fucking point!!

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tracking and spying on the population.

Yeah i dunno how people still don't get this.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (6 children)

So a company can collect copies of everyone's ID cards.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago

Door to door mail could be considered user to user too. Oh wait, I shouldn't give them ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This isn’t considered verification in the UK from what I can tell. Companies are now implementing AI face scans, ID checks and credit card verification to comply with the UK law. I’m not a lawyer or even British, but it wouldn’t make sense to me that companies would spend money to turn away their UK customers otherwise.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How are they checking that your website’s face scans are actually ‘working’ and not just passing everyone?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also what stops someone just getting OBS virtual webcam and just feed it stock video of some old geezer...?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 19 points 2 days ago (6 children)

They make you do things like open your mouth and smile

You'd have to use a video game... Which people are doing

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have an idea. Cardboard cutout masks.

That's never going to pass for a real person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fergie434@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Enter your birthdate:

01/01/1970

load more comments (3 replies)

Please post this to r/Unitedkingdom.

load more comments
view more: next ›