this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
415 points (99.8% liked)

Political Memes

9232 readers
2305 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

See, this is why I lean left. I'm not far left or alt left, I have some right leaning tendencies too, and I'm not gonna get into that because that's neither here nor there, but all told I do lean left. And the reason is, generally speaking people on the left have their morals too (and it's odd that the right says we don't) and if someone on our side, even if we think he's a saint (how people see Keanu Reeves, because he doesn't play villains and they never played Cyberpunk, I guess) or maybe the best chance of beating an alt-right candidate in a high stakes election... we will bring him down, with facts. We hold ours accountable. The right? They say it's fine for them to do bad things but for poor people? Stiff penalties because they gotta appear tough on crime... as long as it's poor, dark skinned, or LGBTQ+ people doing the crime. If it's them and theirs it's fine. Never forget, they nominated and elected a convicted felon, an insurrectionist, a rioter, a traitor... and oh yes, a pedophile. They had plenty of cleaner guys they could have ran but they didn't.

Now, there's a rule in law, or a rule of thumb, I'm not sure if it has a name. It basically says if you destroy or hide evidence, that evidence is whatever we say it is. I don't think it's an actual law, it's more of a philosophy of sorts. So everyone opposed to releasing the Epstein files, we can assume that either they are in them, or someone they owe favors to is, and it's worse than we think. Like, I'm inclined to think maybe Trump fooled around with some 15-16 year old girls who could pass for 18-20. Lot of rich people probably do. Grass green, water wet, news at six, etc. He knows his base doesn't judge him for the stuff we know he's done. So what's he afraid of?

Here's my theory: we all know Trump is in the Epstein files. It's a sure bet. I think that Trump doesn't care about his name being smeared. How much worse could his reputation get now? Nah, I think the GOP has a short list of younger men (guys in their 40s and 50s, say) who could carry the torch for the next 8 years. I don't doubt Trump would try for a third term if he had the health and youth for it. He has neither. I honestly think we need to stop worrying about his third term and start worrying about the two terms his successor is going for. Anyway, I think one or more of these successors are in the files, and they probably messed with some obviously underage and very young looking girls. Like 13 but can pass for 10, young. Underdeveloped, partly malnourished, that kind of thing. And these guys, after another 4 years of Trump, are going to come up and say they're going to fix things. They're going to fight hard for the middle and some of the left, but they're going to be just as bad. And I think Trump is trying to protect these guys more so than himself.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Never ask a trumper why they dont want the Epstein files released,

Big bird why they never got cookie monster any help

Or, a Christian what Jesus was doing with that partially dressed young boy in the garden of gethsemane and why Peter, James and John had to keep watch for him, from a distance.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What? I've never heard about that one.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Mark 14:51, 52. The actual ancient Greek is quite clear about the practically naked young (pre-pubescent being the closest comparative term) boy. They all would've been conversing in ancient Greek and the earliest records of the bible are in ancient Greek.

Here's another thing to think about. How old do you reckon the disciples were? Imagine, if you will, that our kneejerk answer comes from Renaissance era paintings and those alone and you need to aim the number significantly south of that. They were not older than Jesus.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They were speaking Anatolian and all of the gospels were written down at least decades after the events being described.

Where did you get that idea from?

Greek was the lingua franka of the Eastern med and his first language would've been aramaic. So, why would he ignore his first and second languages, to speak Turkish to a Jewish and roman audience?

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 42 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The right wants what's best for their own party and will only complain about something if it hurts their image. The left wants what's best for everyone, even if it hurts their party.

The DNC and RNC, though, are basically the same right-leaning party and don't give a shit about their constituents. Which is why we're in this mess in America in the first place. The DNC won't stand up for what's right when the RNC pulls a BS move because it hurts their own political gains too. We don't actually have a left party in America, so most American ideals are completely unrepresented.

That's why the DNC is fighting against Zohran Mamdani in the New York mayoral election. He's an actual left candidate, not the centrist-right figurehead they wanted on the Democrat ticket (Andrew Cuomo). So when Cuomo lost the primary for that Democrat ticket, he chose to continue running as an independent, to split the vote and ruin Mamdani's chance of winning. Because the DNC would rather have a Republican in office than an actual left candidate.

Which is why we say, "RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!" There are going to be Democrats AND Republicans on the list. We don't care. Punish them all. Actually drain the swamp. We have no party loyalty because we don't have an honorable party to represent us.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

The funny thing is that Cuomo and Adams are probably siphoning more votes from Sliwa than from Mamdani. Hell, almost 1/4 of Fox News watchers are planning on voting for Mamdani. Decent chance he gets an outright majority.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Fuck it. I'm just voting for you in 2028.

[–] Jela@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago

I just KNOW Beyonce and Jay-Z are on that list right next to Diddy.. Illuminati=Epstein list

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The right will circle the wagons when one of them violates both rule and moral. The left demands justice regardless.

There is no both sides.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Therefore you should vote left if you can find a candidate or party that is left of center, needn't be an extreme leftist.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

What if you’re on it though?

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 32 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Then I should get what's coming to me

[–] Klear@quokk.au 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Hell yeah! I'd vote for you, unless you're in the Epstein files, in which case fuck off!

That's so nice of you... thinking a lemmy user has enough money to even be elegible to appear on it..

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Get the fuck away from me, Rod Serling! You already turned me into Hitler and took my sight!

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

If Jesus were on the list, who do you think introduced him to Epstein? The pope or a cardinal? Some mega church pastor? Some errant thought in the middle of a prayer?

As an aside, if prayers work like Bruce almighty, god could be advertised to 24/7.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

YOU'RE STANDING ON MY NECK! 🎶

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, Artie's definitely on the list.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

If Jesus is on the list, we'll CRUCIFY HIM AGAIN

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What if the "list" is a right-wing myth as the press reported ages ago?

I don't disclaim it's a useful myth: I like agitating MAGA into a self-destructive frenzy as much as anyone.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Did Epstein keep one specific, comprehensive list of his clients? Unclear.

Is there enough information recovered from Epstein's computers to compile a pretty long list of people who provably raped children? Absolutely.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

What if Dolly was on the list?