327
Property Values > Everything
(lemmy.zip)
We need to stop treating housing like bitcoin
That's exactly the point many people don't seem to get. Yes, zoning more land for construction or lowering building cost might help but the key issue is that housing has become a major asset for the rich and especially institutional investors globally. There's just so much money out there in search of investment opportunities but unlike stocks or Bitcoin housing is a core human need. Coupled with increasing wealth inequality and stagnant wages this is a major problem. When crypto or Nasdaq celebrate new records that's nice for investors but when the property market goes up and up many people can no longer afford rent.
Privat property investors are part of the problem whether they like it or not. Given these circumstances I find it hard to imagine a solution that doesn't include massive state intervention in the housing market.
Re: intervention
I think it's a tough sell because building more housing density upsets current NIMBY citizens at the expense of future citizens. People who want to move to Austin, TX, for example, don't have any say in who is on the city council today.
Housing policy is very much driven by people who want to pull the ladder up behind them and ride land appreciation into retirement.
I understand that the whole NIMBY paradigm is frustrating, but you have to look at it from their point of view. Imagine youve worked and saved for YEARS to buy a house for $250k. A few years later your city wants to build a homeless shelter right next door to you. Your housing value just fucking plummeted into the earth and is now actively burying itself. Your stuck paying off a loan that you'll never recover from as the house is no longer worth what you paid for it. It's the nightmare scenario. Sure...I get that people regard NIMBY's as these entitled, rich pricks, but it couldn't be further from the truth. A crash in your housing value like that would be financially devastating for MOST people.
I find this to be a bit of a straw man. We're not talking about the worst case scenario here. We're talking about a lot of simple changing of density so more people can live in an area. I own a single family home right across the street from apartments. My property values are fine. And a lot of the NIMBY stuff isn't "I don't want my property values going down." It's "I don't want to live next to...you know...those people." If people don't want to live next door to a homeless shelter, that's one thing. If they don't want to live next to a 5-over-1, that's quite another. That's just life. The world doesn't stop just because people want to live somewhere for 30 years and don't want the neighborhood to change.
In a more holistic sense, we need to move away from the concept that your house should appreciate in value. Change the word "house" to "car" and people would think you're crazy. Of course cars go down in value, why not housing? My understanding is that in Japan, homes do not appreciate. The concept that increases in home equity drive a lot of people's wealth is what drives all of this.
Given these circumstances I find it hard to imagine a solution that doesn't include massive state intervention in the housing market.
Oh, the solution is anarcho-communism. No state, no investors. Best of both worlds.
Decommodification is the way to go for any basic human need.
The person who owned the property next to my house built a huge, ugly, $700k single family home.
I didn't have much choice about it. I would have much preferred if it was affordable housing. If it was going to be huge and ugly, I'd rather it have 2-4 apartments.
Of course, all my neighbors probably hate me for how my yard looks. It's not like I have dead cars in my yard, but I probably would if I could afford to have more than the one I drive.
I wish we would just build a shitton of tiny apartments. I currently live in 22m^2, and honestly, it's nice (except for the price..). Give me like 30m^2 or 35m^2 instead and I could probably live there for as long as I live alone. I don't need a big place, what am I gonna use all that space for, anyway?
35m^2 = approximately 377 sqft
There's plenty of small apartments in the United States, just as there's a lot of small (under 1000 sqft) houses. But apparently, the minimum square footage people demand these days for houses is 2,000.
That's a lie. People want smaller houses, but contractor won't build them because it is less profitable.
According to what actually sells the quickest, it's houses between 1500 and 2000 square feet. The median size of homes across the United States is 2,014 square feet.
If there isn't a stock of smaller houses, then there won't be a market for it.
The small houses that remains are the old beat up houses with a ton of work from before WW2 for an absurd price.
If the hot markets only have 2000 sqft houses and bumfuck nowhere have small houses, yeah larger houses will sell faster.
Small 2 bedroom houses under 1000 sqft, even newly renovated, don't sell as well as 3 bedroom houses at least 1500 sqft. This is reality. People have more "stuff" than they used to and that "stuff" requires a larger amount of square footage.
My house is literally across the street from a large community of affordable housing. It’s largely made up of immigrants and BIPOC folks. I love living here.
Granted there was a police involved shooting this summer 50 feet from my back door, but that guy fled to my neighborhood and wasn’t so much a part of it.
It's not necessarily about property values, but rather the types of people low income housing attract. Most of them are perfectly normal people I'd be happy to have in my neighborhood, but there's always a few who ruin it for the rest. I don't want to suddenly worry about getting robbed on my street.
I also hate that I feel this way, and I'd really prefer to just give everyone the benefit of doubt, but I've seen it happen too many times to just ignore it.
It's always an unpopular opinion to say that there are bad people in the world but it's the truth.
Of course there are bad people in the world. That's why I don't want rich people to move into my neighbourhood. I want to live in a neighbourhood full of working class people who are well-off enough not to need drugs or stealing to survive, but who haven't gained their money by stepping on others.
You are literally generalizing people with money as bad people. That's the same as generalizing all poor people as drug users and thieves.
If you look down on the idea of generalising people as bad for their class, why'd you do it?
I didn't.
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
327 points (96.6% liked)
Memes
8309 readers
1595 users here now
Post memes here.
A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.
An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.
- Wait at least 2 months before reposting
- No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca can be better place for that
- Use NSFW marking accordingly
Laittakaa meemejä tänne.
- Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
- Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
- Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS