this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
644 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25505 readers
3139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The arrest of a US army veteran who protested against the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown has raised alarms among legal experts and fellow veterans familiar with his service in Afghanistan.

Bajun Mavalwalla II – a former army sergeant who survived a roadside bomb blast on a special operations mission in Afghanistan – was charged in July with “conspiracy to impede or injure officers” after joining a demonstration against federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) in Spokane, Washington.

Legal experts say the case marks an escalation in the administration’s attacks on first amendment rights. Afghanistan war veterans who know him say the case against Mavalwalla appears unjust.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] suddenlyme@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Looks like fascism

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Looking forward to the day every single one of these jack-booted thugs from the Nazi leaders at the top all the way down to the ICE Gestapo pigs face Justice at our version of the Nuremberg trials.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I’m thinking more like the terror from the French Revolution

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Do not hold your breath. By all indications these guys are going to consolidate power and make a one-party stay with rigged elections. We have no opposition popular or muscular or ambitious enough to unseat them. After 2028 it is doubtful any opposition could unseat them.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And who is going to do that? The rest of the world is going to sit idly by as the US marches brown and lgbt+ people into the extermination camps. Hell half of them will use it as justification to build their own camps and invade the other half. All while the world slowly cooks itself.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A depressing thought, if Nazi Germany had only done the Holocaust without the invasions, the powers of the time would have completely ignored it. At most they would have shook their heads disapprovingly.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

China genocided the Uhygurs, and the world kind of just watched it happen.

We're still just sitting and watching Isreal exterminate the Palestinians. No country has impeaded Isreal in any meaningful way.

The rest of the world has their own stuff to deal with. America is going to have to resolve its own problems.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

The Nuremberg Trials barely got down to the level that these guys are at. They sorta gave up after a while.

Though Christopher Lee probably took care of a few of them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Wasn't that the Jan 6th hearings? No one got pardoned from Nuremburg. Political pardons aren't even a thing in most countries.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

be the change you want to see

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Alarm"

.. fuck off the place is on fire

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

the place is on fire

Which is typically when you heed an alarm...

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Alarms exist to alert you when the dangers are not immediately obvious, or are somewhere else. The US is on fire both figuratively and literally and people are waiting for the alarms to go off before the even decide to start thinking about maybe doing something.

Emergency alarms famously turn off after five minutes.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Not months later!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

Due process was officially over the line. Before that it was alarm but that was the match and hes just been heaping gasoline on it since.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You know, it sure is weird how much planning for the J6 terrorism was done right out in the open and those in authority at that time did SWEET FUCKALL to stop the J6 terrorists from doing what they did.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

Every time I think about the history of federal involvement in left wing organizing vs right wing organizing in this country, my blood pressure rises about 20%.

I mean, fuck. We inspired and then "rehabilitated" the Nazis. We took a shitton of higher ups and just pardoned them and gave them jobs in gov. Shockingly, the gov has been rather opposed to left wing ideas since.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

That same opposition that we went to all of that trouble to get in power in 2020 despite them sucking and predictably failing is still in control of the party as arrogant as ever, shouting down anyone arguing for popular electable candidates. Sabotaging any popular electable candidates that might get in there as with Mandami in New York City.

Without getting real opposition and otherwise real leadership there is no way we will unseat these guys ever. And unseating them for an establishment candidate just prevents things from getting bad at an accelerated rate. Nothing is fixed, things still get worse. Which is why they lose.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 141 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's going to get thrown right the fuck out of court, not even the fascist judges will bother with that shit.

But he'll be stuck in the jail system until that point, which is the real intent.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but did you read the person's name?

[–] SneakyLeif@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How dare their parents name them that?! Now they have no option but to become a terrorist /s

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

He had so many chances in his life to change his name to Johnny Patriot, too.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

And all his biometric and other data will be part of Palantir for use down the road when they start to claim “biomarkers that signal traitorous citizens” or some shit to round people up

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't count on it. They got the indictment which means enough jurors thought it more likely than not that he did it. Remember the charge is “conspiracy to impede or injure officers.” To prove this all they need is a social media post between protestors before the fact saying that they were going to block the drive way. That would, I suspect, constitute impeding the officers. This is a really stupid arrest, but unless some jurors just flat out refuse to convict, this guy could spend real time in jail.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A reminder that Grand Juries indict 99.99999% of the time. To the point where the multiple grand Juries that refused to indict the guy that threw the sandwich at ICE officers was actually newsworthy.

They aren't there to determine whether it is likely someone did something, just whether the charges are even minimally plausible.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

They also generally only hear what the prosecution wants them to hear. If you only hear one side of the story, then it's easy to err on that side.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Regular juries asses whether the charges are "proven beyond a reasonable doubt." Grand juries have a different standard of, "more likely than not." The prosecutors in this case convinced enough of the grand jury that he 'more likely than not commuted the crime. Not sure how you meant "minimally plausible" but those are the standards the courts use.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

The standard for a grand jury is probable cause, not more likely than not. Civil court is preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not), and criminal is beyond a reasonable doubt.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 80 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good! Protesting is NOT Protected by the Constitution!

-People who Say School Shooters ARE Protected by the Constitution!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

-People who Say School Shooters ARE Protected by the Constitution!

(may not apply if shooter is thought to be trans)

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Or Antifa, or the Leeeeeeffffvt. (Seriously, saying your against Anti Fascism = ? Anyone? Beuler? Anyone? Right, you're pro Fascism. Don't deny it while proving it's what you are by opposition.)

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Excuse me, you mean the trump/Epstein files?

[–] AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Trumpstein files

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that is a direct attack on the first amendment and a show of force to the rest of the population not to get in their way.

Republicans are responsible for this horrible economy, the constitution being burned and ignored, and our country losing all democracy.

I will be sure to remind them at every opportunity what they did to us.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget every single person who voted republican in 24!

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I know several of them and when i talk about this shit going on, they care even less. These people just refuse to vote and the more you try to convince them, the more they don't want to. Really infuriating.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seriously, those that chose not to vote outnumbered the red voters immensely. I feel more anger towards those that chose apathy and lethargy over those that have been conditioned to fear and stupidity.

Voter turnout in the states that mattered most was high.

Trump still won, probably because they hacked the election.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Release the Epstein files!

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Gotta expect that shit from a draft dodging psychopath

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So much for the military being able to stand up for the country as opposed to be an individuals lapdogs.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 15 points 2 days ago

Dissenters will not be tolerated.