this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
98 points (93.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43336 readers
608 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously, Reddit has banned me several times for "breaking rules" but never tells me exactly what I did to deserve the ban, whereas I see that Lemmy will tell you in the modlog what you did.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Well, they'll sometimes tell you a reason you got a ban, but not the reason you got a ban.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 8 hours ago

Smaller community size. It is a lot easier to moderate a small community instead of a large one.

It is also the reason why Reddit moderators fought the API ban. Reddit moderators had developed their own tech stack to help them moderate the very large subs. Lemmy isn't at the size where those tools are needed.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah ₙₒ. The few times I’ve been banned or had my comment removed on reddit, I was told that it happened. On Lemmy, the reason listed is just as obscure and esoteric, but you have to seek it out yourself to even find out it happened

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yup. Rule 1, rule 3, troll, etc. I get that people would rather just write the rule or a simple explanation, but even some of the developers/mods use it to hide behind. Sometimes it seems like they stretch the rule as far as it'll go to fit the need.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

Reddit banned me for a comment that they interpreted as pro Hamas, but never came out and said it, despite the “check your inbox” banner.

fewer ppl, more time

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Give it time. Lemmy will become like Reddit given enough use base and time. It’s inevitable.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Especially as reddit keeps banning hundreds of people everyday and those people will get tired of evading bans and come here.

Just hope it takes years for the bots to arrive here since there is no money to be made.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Pretty sure they are already among us

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It's not - it's always up to the mod/admin's discretion to tell you the reason why you were banned, and just like on reddit it's usually bullshit that they won't elaborate on.

I have been banned from multiple communities that I've never even so much as visited, let alone commented in or posted a topic on, with zero reason given. I've messaged the mod who did it (after they tried to hide it by having the log just say "mod" instead of their username, but there is a way to find out the actual mods name), and they just ignore the messages.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lemmy sucks at this, what are you on about?

It doesn't tell you. You have to check manually, and the mod/admin can literally hide entries on the log if they wanted to (as well as not bother with typing out a reason or give a bs one).

I like Lemmy a lot, but the way you are informed of mod actions against you is absolute dogshit.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The public modlog is one of the best features of Lemmy, IMO. When a Lemmy user appeals to the public of stuff mods/admins have done, we can call BS on them since we can read through stuff if they've been toxic, or if it's the mods on a power-trip, or if it's controversially borderline but reasonable discretion given the circumstances.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 day ago

It also got rid of some toxic mods since their actions are also public.

I remember a Reddit powermod complaining about it after the big migration.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

The mod log certainly helps, because it leaves a public trail of evidence for each ban, but it ultimately still depends on the server admin, because they are in charge of choosing their mods. But at least no one can ban you from the platform entirely, at worst you can get banned from an entire instance.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

You can call BS, sure, but nothing happens other than the mods/admins just banning you as well and/or covering their tracks better. It's no better than reddit in actually preventing bullshit mod actions.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I grant you that it's not perfect and it doesn't prevent the abuse in the first place, but calling it out is important. There are still plenty of dramata about people DMing each other, but there's less hearsay involved with the ban actions themselves. Appropriate suspicion is cast upon any mod that's too vague with their ban comments or any user that doesn't want to reveal their old banned username.

In terms of what users can do about mod abuse: There have been coordinated community shifts in response. A couple examples:

!onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone was created because the !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone mods wanted to forcibly move the community to !196@lemmy.world, but most users didn't like that because BZ has more LBGTQ+ friendly policy. So the new community got set up with new mods.

!risa@startrek.website more or less moved or splintered to !tenforward@lemmy.world after some mod beefing and people getting banned for some rules even though it was a "no real rules" community.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 19 hours ago

Appropriate suspicion is cast upon any mod that’s too vague with their ban comments

One of the biggest issues here is, like reddit, most of the ban actions are shown as just being done by "mod", not giving the specific mod account that did it.

I didn't know that. I think on reddit that would have creeped me out but I might not end up minding as much here.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Because Lemmy is moderated by human beings.

[–] nonBInary@thelemmy.club 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i was just banned for "multiple violations" like 1min ago but they didn't say what i did.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Reddit will tell you why you were banned. It generates a PM with the reason and a link to the offending post.

For example, I was banned for inciting violence towards a protected group of people… in reference to saying child predators should face stiffer legal penalties. Someone took it the wrong (or maybe right) way because their president is in the Epstein files. Honestly I wasn’t even thinking of him but if the prison jumpsuit fits… anyway, it was not a mystery to me.

I did appeal in case AI flagged me but a human upheld it.

But as to why Lemmy is better in that regard… more open platform trying to improve upon the formula of those that came before. Also run by people not corporations. And not operated by the GOP.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course, on Lemmy things also depend on your instance. I got banned fromba group by a mod that is at the same time a lemmy.ml admin for mentioning that China is putting Uyghyrs to concentration camps.

On lemmy.ml you can get banned for things you wouldn't get elsewhere. The solution for that is to join a group for the same theme but hosted on another instance. I'm in three communities hosted on .ml, because their alternatives are not active enough. But, of course I always prefer the non-.ml alternative when available.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Which three?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 23 hours ago

You thinking you got banned from Reddit for criticizing trump or anything "GOP" is hilarious.

[–] obbeel@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking about that yesterday. What if corporations decide that the way the Fediverse does things (especifically Lemmy and Mastodon) is the right way to go? By that I mean chronological order of posts, community-centered and small web). It doesn't have to be big corporations, just people financially interested enough to bring money without really wanting to change things. That would be chaotic to the current state of the Fediverse.

There are several layers to this: maybe the government of Austria thinks it's a good idea to put money into this; or maybe Philips (from the Netherlands) decides to pour money on the current state of the Fediverse or make its own real Fediverse (not faux-Fediverse like Bluesky).

I'm pretty new to this, so I can't really game it out in my mind what the effect would be. My first instinct is to say that they would pour money into one instance, probably the biggest one, and the rest of the federated instances would just go about their merry way.

In fact, there are corporate federated services... I mean Bluesky is kinda federated, so is, I think Threads by Facebook/Instagram? But a lot of services don't federate with it because they don't like the people behind them.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Sometimes. Some servers will "rule 1" you and rule one basically amounts to "don't say things I don't like."

And then sometimes you say the Tiflis bank robbery was bad because they blew up innocent people on the street with grenades, and then a guy responds that "it was pretty cool actually," and then you get banned for saying "well I hope something cool happens to you then" in an attempt to get them to empathize with the victims by putting themselves as the victim instead if the "pretty cool" robbers, despite being the one who in practice is against the murder of innocents, and then you can't tell if you were banned because the mod couldn't process the context of the thread or because they were a tankie who agrees murdering innocents is, in fact, pretty cool. I mean, sure I was being rude becauase I'm not usually nice when people say murdering innocents in the process of a bank robbery is "pretty cool," so, 50/50, but it's still silly.

And then sometimes you get banned because one person on your server has an argument with one mod on another and the second mod decides to ban your whole instance as a result because he's totally not butthurt.

It's a little more transparent, but this place can be just as silly as reddit.

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Think of Reddit as Cyberpunk or Mirror's Edge: a world controlled by corporations instead of governments. A corporation only seeks its own interests and those of its shareholders. In that world, you're nothing. There's no transparency, and you don't have any rights.

Lemmy instances on the other hand are run by the community and funded by donations. As such, the interests of the group as a whole prevail; they are not the interests of shareholders. To maintain cohesion, transparency is necessary, hence the modlog. Without transparency, cohesion and community cannot be maintained.

Reddit and Lemmy are two completely different worlds.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was banned for using a slur. I was quoting a line from a movie (in quotation marks) in a post about that movie. It was so obviously a quote.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was helping a commenter with his gun problem and wondered if there was something he could try "to retard the action". Mods were great in that sub, but still almost caught ban. "We don't use that word here."

[–] vurt_konnegut@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That’s pretty sad. It’s a word with various meanings, you can’t just ban the word outright. In the medical community we might say that a chemical can “retard growth of cells.” Properly used it’s a viable scientific term.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

That's very subjective.

Both platforms have the option for mods to tell you exactly what you did wrong; and on both, sometimes they utilize that option sometimes they don't.

It's entirely up to the individual mods in each specific community.

Lemmy does generally tend to be a bit more open; just because it's a growing platform looking to expand its userbase, so the mods make a bit more of an effort to create peace/understanding vs just ban hammering any problems into oblivion.

Reddits grown big enough that it can throw its weight around a bit carelessly and have less worry of the userbase collapsing.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got banned from jai.lu, reason "reactionary"

🤷🏼‍♀️

[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah I guess so 😂

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

It feels pretty similar

You either get banned with a copy/paste response that doesn't actually apply, or you get nothing

The worst harassment gets banned with the right reason, but there are tons of bans where the person with the power just didn't like you.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago

Sometimes it's a tactic to discourage escalation because it adds confusion.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

There's no central authority forcing things to be one way or the other, so to the extent that there are differences they are cultural in nature.

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd assume the biggest reason, in addition to what others have said, is the difference in user numbers. It's a lot easier to be a good mod at this scale than at the massive scale of Reddit, especially with the rampant AI bots, and without powerful tools like defederation, the clearly visible mod log, etc.

I'd assume most people bothering to moderate, even on Reddit, intend to do a good job with every report, but being overworked forces people's hand.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 23 hours ago

I’d assume most people bothering to moderate, even on Reddit, intend to do a good job with every report, but being overworked forces people’s hand.

Nah, most people who become mods do it because they love the power that it gives them to be important and to silence anyone they disagree with.