this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
359 points (99.7% liked)

News

32302 readers
5893 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

It's almost like it was frivolous.

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 35 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Probably AI generated

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Always good to see the Orange Nazi lose.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

Not a loss. The judge just kicked it back as it was a load of whining and shit. If he can make a real grown-up suit out of it, it'll be back on.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Headline tomorrow: "Trump appeals decision against New York Times, suit remains."

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 80 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

It is scary that the last line of defense against authoritarianism is the judicial system.

Yep, because the Tribunal of Six is the final (legal) court of appeal in the country.

The checks are fraudulent and the balances have been tampered with.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

No the last line is the citizens but they seem content to sit back and watch their democracy collapse.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

People aren't just sitting back though. The world literally just watched someone intentionally kill Charlie Kirk in a public setting, in front of thousands of people.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

literally just watched

What other way to watch is there?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Telepathically?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

He wasn't defending democracy. He shot him because he wasn't fascist enough

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That's speculation at best. The kid they apprehended hasn't confessed to anything.

Dont listen to the pundits. For anything. As someone recently suggested, pundits are just the court jesters keeping us divided.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

I’ll take the win, regardless

[–] Hector@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago

The shooter shot him because he was spreading hate.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

If it comes to the citizens, we're all gonna have a bad time.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

There are some people doing some stuff. But definitely not at the scale nor intensity required.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 6 points 10 hours ago

There's another line after that, but people don't like talking about it.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

More scary that it's down to lawyers. Not the judges.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I get what you are saying and totally empathize with the sentiment given a modern context, but that is the purpose of judiciaries and why the US federal goverment structure was designed the way it was.

What's surprising is not that it's the last line of defense, it's that we've been pushed to the fucking brink.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

USA fell off the brink last November. Everything going on now is the falling down bit while people hope someone else is stacking pillows at the bottom. But pillows got real expensive lately and a new Trump headline just dropped.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 32 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

"As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective -- not a protected platform to rage against an adversary."

You have to be a really shit lawyer to work for Trump.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It would be great if the lawyers actually faced consequences for such blatant abuses of their profession. Lawyers are supposed to have standards they adhere to which are obviously not being followed. These lawyers know what they are doing is wrong and are doing it intentionally, their Bar association really should not tolerate this behavior.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They can, and many of Trump's lawyers have. It's a process though.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

They should be figuring out ways to expedite that process because any semblance of respect for our legal system is vaporizing by the hour.

Sure the average person always had mistrust of it, but when you have the important people in the industry say it, you know it's fucked because part of their job is to try to retain respect for the institution.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They should be figuring out ways to expedite that process because any semblance of respect for our legal system is vaporizing by the hour.

That cuts both ways - you want a process that is diligent and non-reactionary. Trump will always find more stupid lawyers willing to fall on their sword for him anyway.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah but the bar will drop low. He will have lawyers so stupid they are completely ineffectual.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

I loved that quote! 😄

And this was a court they cherrypicked for presumed favorability.

I love that we still get some moments like this.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

The judge gave them a page limit, too.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Stormy Daniels: "I've seen faster."

[–] apenstaartje@lemmy.cafe 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hey if we never do anything about it they know they can keep doing it.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Well the judge threw it out at lightspeed, that's something

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago