291
submitted 11 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/news@lemmy.world
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 59 points 11 months ago

26 year old woman ... I totally didn't see that. I don't think the article mentioned her party affiliation but I think we can all guess.

[-] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

A 26 year old black female, the exact opposite of who i had figured.

[-] MamLaLiq@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"The name of the woman was released early Friday morning. Atlanta Police identified her as 26-year-old Laneisha Shantrice Henderson." (From the article)

I don't know her party affiliation. Sometimes people have reasons the rest of us cannot understand, it's not always political.

I use Boost for Lemmy in Swipe-mode (android). Linked articles are embedded so you don't have to open and accept cookies and whatnot to read what the post is about.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Dude I didn't know Boost existed for lemmy! Boost getting canned is the reason I quit reddit. Thanks for the plug!

[-] FrostKing@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That's very cool! Do you (or anyone else that wants to answer) know if Sync has a similar feature?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

"Democrats are the party of slavery and Jim Crow! Anyway I'm gonna go burn down MLKs childhood home."

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Why? Just because they're young and have a vagina doesn't mean they're immune from bigotry

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago

It doesn't, I'm just pointing out my own bias.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

Eh, statistics aren't infallible

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 11 months ago

It's a woman, guys. Jesus. I see the reddit transplants still won't read or watch a 30 sec news clip.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh yeah, tell me about it. I post a lot of articles in various communities, so I probably see more comments that the average user. I cannot overstate how annoying it is to open my inbox to find a deluge of comments from people asking things that are explained within the first sentence or two of an article. Or as in this case, getting the basic facts incorrect because they only read the headline. Lemmy isn't any different than reddit in that regard.

[-] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Being a "reddit transplant" who took the time to understand what was going on, I think your joke is overplayed and weirdly elitist. Imagine being prideful of not having found Lemmy through Reddit, or whatever it is you're trying to imply?? lol

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Let's not pretend that Lemmy is a bastion of intellectuals, and that it's just former Redditors that are the problem...

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 11 months ago

Imagine being on a Reddit clone and shit talking former Redditors at all lol

Talk about self owns

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The place where people read the headline and make a bunch of assumptions is called "the whole ass universe", not reddit. Besides, people who clicked on the article before posting only wanted to fact-check their suspicions because they're insecure about looking stupid.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 14 points 11 months ago

Fortunately gasoline is harder to light than movies suggest it is.

[-] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Speaking from first hand experience, I want to point this out so people understand the danger involved. Gasoline is very easy to ignite with an open flame (lighter or match) but hard to light with a smoldering ember (like a lit cigarette). if you pour it on something porous like a pile of brush or gravel, then the vapors that get retained in the pile add an explosive element. But even a puddle of gasoline in a metal can outside on a windy day is extremely easy to ignite. You can pour it over wet soil and it will ignite immediately if you throw a match at it. If its wet with straight gas, it will light, and possibly explode with a big whoomph if vapors are retained. Take it seriously and respect it.

Kerosene, diesel fuel, and oil mixed gasoline are surprisingly hard to ignite unless they are poured over a wicking element like cardboard, fabric, or a fiberglass wick. Lighting a puddle of it requires a blow torch for a period of time to get the fluid up to the flash point.

If you are trying to start a bonfire with boyscout juice, never use straight gasoline. Mix it atleast 10:1 with oil or 5:1 with diesel to take the bite out of it, then it will light much more safely.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The fluid itself doesn't ignite, the vapors ignite.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago

Exactly, dousing something and then tossing your zippo at it when waking away doesn't work

[-] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

With gasoline it would definitely work, as long as the flame on the zippo didn’t get blown out by throwing it. Gasoline is very volatile and it doesn’t take much time for the vapors to exist.

With the other fuels and mixtures like in that previous reply, yeah results will vary.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

True, an open flame or an electrical spark will ignite the vapors.

[-] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe she doesnt smoke. Chicks who never smoked seen to struggle with lighters a lot.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Glad the burning stopped.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago
[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Doesn't fox news support racists and promote racism

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fox News Channel ≠ local Fox affiliates.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

What's the difference? Brit here so no idea.

[-] wwaxen@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

They're local news stations that carry the Fox brand and play Fox TV (Sitcoms, dramas, etc) the rest of the time on the channel. They don't have to show outwardly reactionary opinions of Fox news or show Tucker Carlson, for example.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately a lot of them are owned by Sinclair, so you still get the reactionary opinions, just in smaller doses from a different company.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Tucker Carlson isn't on Fox News anymore. But yes, local Fox stations do not have to show Fox News programming, but Fox News does offer local stations news packages that are generally opinion-free to use in their programming (I used to shoot and edit news for a local Fox station). They're also not owned by Fox. The one I worked for was owned by NexStar and the same company also owned the local ABC station. They had the same newscasters and shared the same building, but the ABC station used ABC News packages instead.

[-] Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It was a black woman so..... maybe?

[-] Im14abeer@midwest.social -4 points 11 months ago

This man has an incurable case of malignant stupidity. The dealership where Malcolm X bought his first car was next on his arson targets list.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago
[-] Im14abeer@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago

You know, I almost looked first before making my throwaway comment. I thought to myself no way this isn't a fool of a white boy. It's not only a woman, it's a black woman. I did not see that coming. I solemnly swear to be better in the future, because the world is unpredictable.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

Good on you man. It’s not seen often that someone so graciously changes their perspective like you did. Well done man.

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
291 points (98.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS