306

Sweden moves one step closer to NATO membership after a Turkish parliamentary committee gives approval (apnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] 332@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

We've caught on to how this works now. I anticipate about two more iterations of tedious, drawn out flip-flopping and misinformation during the remaining steps before we are either finally let in or the whole thing fizzles out.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

There is already very heavy pressure on Turkey to let Sweden in, so I don't see this having any chance to fizzle out, Turkey may be a valuable member, but there are limits to their value.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Zero chance NATO lets the Black Sea and Bosporus + Dardanelles fall into russia’s sphere.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago

Black Sea or Baltic Sea.

Get both and you've cut off 2/3 of Russia's major ports. (facing west)

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think getting out of Mediterranean at Gibraltar is worth more than getting into the black sea. If Turkey wants to play hardball with EU USA and NATO, they will quickly realize how much they are the underdog, and no idiot dictator shouting his stupidities can prevent that.
Turkey is not playing by the rules, but is exploiting a situation, despite the it would benefit Turkey too to have Sweden in NATO.
If Turkey can't respect the mutual interests of an international institution they themselves benefit from, they can go fuck themselves.
Some things can be bought at too high a price.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

It’s very different. Turkey completely controls access to the Black Sea, which ties into several MAJOR river networks across Europe. The strait of Gibraltar is much wider, and also not controlled by a single nation, so it’s far less feasible to block, for a lot of reasons.

[-] nekandro@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

There is no limit to the geographic value of Turkey against Russia

[-] Valthorn@feddit.nu 1 points 10 months ago

And after Turkey is done we get to live it all over again with Hungary

[-] ashar@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

Time for the Sverige Democrats to say something stupid, bigoted and offensive to Türkiye

[-] autotldr 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — The Turkish Parliament’s foreign affairs committee gave its consent to Sweden’s bid to join NATO on Tuesday, drawing the previously non-aligned Nordic country closer to membership in the Western military alliance.

The Turkish parliament’s foreign affairs committee had begun discussing Sweden’s membership in NATO last month.

The meeting however, was adjourned after legislators from Erdogan’s ruling party submitted a motion for a postponement on grounds that some issues needed more clarification and that negotiations with Sweden had not “matured” enough.

Sweden and Finland abandoned their traditional positions of military nonalignment to seek protection under NATO’s security umbrella, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Finland joined the alliance in April, becoming NATO’s 31st member, after Turkey’s parliament ratified the Nordic country’s bid.

NATO requires the unanimous approval of all existing members to expand, and Turkey and Hungary are the only countries that have been holding out.

The original article contains 362 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] flussgeistbusiness@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Top!

[-] dojan@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Oh we're still on about this NATO stuff? We're halfway to another election and they've still not sorted it out.

Like I don't blame the current government for Erdogan and whatshisface in that shithole being obstinate, but at this point I'm sure we could've put all that money and energy on more useful things than trying to appease a fickle dictator.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

If this hasn't been a wakeup call to NATO that their membership process is broken then I doubt we'll ever see a new member. The time, energy, unpredictability, and susceptibility to influences from bad actors is a huge deterrent already, and it'll only get worse over time.

If they can't do away with the veto system there should at least be a mechanism in place for ejecting bad actors. Maybe Turkey is too strategic to face such a risk, but backsliding countries like Hungary would at least need to stop exploiting/blocking the system without legitimate cause. Far too easy for Russia/China/etc to buy off a handful of politicians to block any future expansion.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Common to many of our institutions, international and national, are that they were designed based on an expectation of some sort of correctness and decency and respect towards the institution by members and associates.
But way to many players have thrown away the rule book, and are working the system on the borderline insane. This goes to the extreme for instance for these notable examples: Putin, Xi, Erdogan, Trump, Orbán. (Russia, China, Turkey, USA, Hungary) Draging their entire country with them. Making this insanity ancompass at least a third of the globe! We need to guard our democracies and institutions against the outrageous even borderline insane populists, even in well established democracies and international organisations that are a huge benefit to all member states. There are examples of people who threaten to tear it apart.
We will see if Netherlands and Gert Wilders will be added to the list of declining societies, in many ways he is not unlike Orbán, and could create huge problems for EU too.

[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Orban is a cunt, but Hungary is far from being a shithole.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Right. I'm not talking about it geographically. I know that it's not a literal hole of shit.

[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, I get that. I just wanted to point out that the standard by which you throw around that label would apply to any country in the world. Cunty politicians are not a Hungarian speciality.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You don't actually know my standard. But here goes; a country where people like me are treated like lessers just because we happen to not fall into the cis-het normative. Countries where women are treated lesser than men. Countries whose policies are heavily influenced by religious bullshittery.

Shithole countries.

Sure I'd rather be in Hungary than the UAE, but they're both shitholes.

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023

306 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39011 readers

2797 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.