99
Why Legal Immigration Is Impossible for Nearly Everyone
(www.cato.org)
short answer: by design
This doesn't appear to even touch on the topic of cost for the process. The fees on paper may only be a couple hundred dollars, but if you want any chance of actually getting through the process correctly without missing paperwork or deadlines resulting in a denial from the bureaucratic machine, you'll essentially need an immigration attorney, and they are not cheap.
When my dad married a woman from the Phillipines about 9 years ago, it ended up costing around $20k for her and one child. That process took almost 5 years to complete... and this was after they'd already been in the US via a Visa and decided to get married here. So ostensibly a bunch of relevant requirements had to have been already verified with the previously approved Visa.
That's worse than my story, sorry they had to go through that.
I married my wife while I was living in her country, Georgia. Then I came back to the U.S. and started the process for her to come. It took 17 months. I didn't need a lawyer for it. We did later try to get a visitor visa for my mother-in-law and it got denied. I always say that if I had it to do over again, it would have probably been cheaper and quicker to fly them both to Mexico and then cross the border.
See also, "why does the tax system work for wealthy businesses but not for people with $1000 in Etsy sales or people who wanted their child tax credits"
Businesses can somehow always find all the immigrants labor they need, but the tired poor yearning suckers have to wait outside and hope the cartels find someone else to pick on
Obligatory fuck Cato.
The take-home is that the US immigration procedure is so inhumane that even the fucking Cato institute thinks it's a bit much.
That's what I was thinking. Cato is awful, and as the other person replying to you was saying how fucked is our immigration system that Cato, of all places, wrote an intelligent article that I mostly agree with.
I got a headache at the flow chart.
I've worked with a lot of IT contractors who were based in India, as well as other Asian and eastern European countries. You'd think the government would want the people doing those jobs to be here, where they would be paying US taxes, and recirculating their pay into our economy. If anything, you'd expect them to make it harder to outsource and easier to immigrate.
It depends who you think the govt is working for. It is not you or me. It is Money. And Money loves immigrant labour as long as the immigrants don't have any rights. Because the reason it loves immigrant labour is that it is much easier to exploit. This article does a good job of illustrating that: The fishermen
On November 22, Joanne circulated a letter among the migrant crew. “I have been made aware the crew members are contacting an outside representative,” it read, possibly referencing a call Quezon made to Stella Maris seeking help for Susada. “I am also aware that crew members have been leaving their port without permission or making our office aware. Sadly the actions by these crew members are beginning to ruin the trust and faith we have placed in our Filipino crew.” It concluded by noting they would make reports to local police and UK immigration authorities “if necessary”.
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
99 points (93.0% liked)
politics
19144 readers
5272 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS